Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Andrew Dwyer said:


WLTP seems more realistic, quite a few Atto owners posted on FB they changed from NEDC to WLTP at their respective showrooms for a small fee of course !

 

Never heard of EPA but appears to be for the owners of lead boots !!

 

Dynamic works for me, obviously there are differences in range between fast highway driving and stop start city driving but with around 75% city and 25% highway i am not far away from WLTP

 

Would EPA not be for the US? 

  • Confused 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

So, if you charge at home (without solar) you're at about 0.66 to 0.78 per km and if you have to use a charge station, you would be at 0.93-1.11 per km for fuel. Sound about right? 

 

 

Yea....sounds right per Km based on typical electric fuel efficiency of different EVs. 

 

Thailand residential "standard" rates (I.e., non-TOU) are approx Bt5/KWH total....DC Fast Charger rates are approx Bt7.5KWH (or higher) during Peak Hours or approx 50% higher than the residential standard rates. 

 

Of course how costs would work per Km would vary from EV to EV, whether or not a person has TOU setup, when he charges, driving environment, etc.  Your estimate per Km sounds right to me. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Pib said:

Yea....sounds right per Km based on typical electric fuel efficiency of different EVs. 

 

Thailand residential "standard" rates (I.e., non-TOU) are approx Bt5/KWH total....DC Fast Charger rates are approx Bt7.5KWH (or higher) during Peak Hours or approx 50% higher than the residential standard rates. 

 

Of course how costs would work per Km would vary from EV to EV, whether or not a person has TOU setup, when he charges, driving environment, etc.  Your estimate per Km sounds right to me. 

I used 5 for home and 7.5 for stations and a 10% loss. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Would EPA not be for the US? 


Yes, apparently it’s the Environmental Protection Agency 

and probably refers to miles not kilometres, which would explain the vast difference between the other 3 range “ standards “.

 

 

https://www.recurrentauto.com/research/who-is-the-epa-and-what-is-epa-rating#:~:text=The EPA%2C or Environmental Protection,go on a full charge.

Edited by Andrew Dwyer
Posted
1 hour ago, Andrew Dwyer said:


WLTP seems more realistic, quite a few Atto owners posted on FB they changed from NEDC to WLTP at their respective showrooms for a small fee of course !

 

Never heard of EPA but appears to be for the owners of lead boots !!

 

Dynamic works for me, obviously there are differences in range between fast highway driving and stop start city driving but with around 75% city and 25% highway i am not far away from WLTP

 

 

EPA range fuel efficiency applies to vehicles sold in the U.S...it's a tougher range test standard compared to WLTP, CLTP, NEHC, etc., whether testing an EV or ICEV.  

 

Getting a Thailand BYD dealership to change the vehicles software to readout in WLTP vs NEDC I'm sure would be an  easy firmware/software update especially since BYD sells vehicles in many countries that use the WLTP standard.   

 

But I'm surprised they would do it since BYD vehicles sold in Thailand receive Thai govt approval for import based on NEDC standards.   See below FAQ snapshot from Rever Automotive website who is the official importer/distributor of BYD vehicles into Thailand (they are basically Headquarters BYD in Thailand).   The FAQ says "no-can-do" a NEDC to WLTP change for BYD vehicles sold in Thailand...but actually they could if they wanted to...it's more like a "no-will-do."  But hey, This Is Thailand and money can change black to white, white to black, and maybe NEDC to WLTP.

 

Additionally, I would think BYD Thailand would be very reluctant to change the displayed range from NEDC to WLTP as it may make the "next" owner of that BYD vehicle wonder why he can never get the "advertised" max range reading after charting to 100%....make him think the car has a problem....maybe start bad-mouthing the BYD car on social media, etc.   Now, if/when BYD starts using the WLTP standard on the paperwork it submits to the Thai govt to get import/sale approval then I could see BYD willing to do a firmware update to have the display show WLTP vs NEDC. 

 

Heck, maybe someday an OTA will arrive that will allow a person to change an infotainment system setting to display in NEDC or WLTP.  Kinda like how you can currently change in the Atto from Standard to Dynamic range mode, Standard to High regen braking, ECO-Normal-Sport power mode, etc.  Seems this would still allow BYD to comply with the govt paperwork it got approved and also satisfy those vehicle owners that want to use a WLTP range estimation....but I expect there are probably legal landmines and additional costs that might not make that appealing to BYD.

 

https://www.reverautomotive.com/en/faq

image.png.91d4fbbd3fe05469909aa1eeb2445d20.png

  • Like 2
Posted

The Renault Scenic E-Tech has achieved first place thanks to 329 votes obtained. For 22 Jurors, this SUV has been chosen as the best of the seven finalists.

The BMW 5-Series, second, has been close to Renault Scenic, with a total of 308 votes and 19 best votes, followed by the new Peugeot 3008, third, with 197 and 3 best votes. The rest of the finalist for the award were Kia EV9 (190 points), Volvo EX30 (168), BYD Seal (131) and Toyota C-HR (127).

https://www.caroftheyear.org/index.php

Looks similar to any of the other Compact crossover SUV on the market

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Bandersnatch said:

The BYD Seal was one of the finalists of the car of the year award held at the Geneva Motor Show. 
IMG_3568.thumb.jpeg.25cc83c0a83e838cc237819149c814a0.jpeg

 

I am sure the many Seal owners in this forum believed that the Seal deserved to win.

 

The winner has just been announced…

 

It’s a Renault mini van 🤔

The MG MAXUS 9 (van) is pretty awesome and very plush inside, with nice specs.   Actually  negative for me, as my purpose for a van would be to convert to a RV.   So wasted money to buy plush, to then take out.

 

So no Renault dealers in Th :coffee1:

 

MG MAXUS 9 Specs (drivetrain):

image.png.0dcb8f6e18c29a20272ffb7a151e7a13.png

Edited by KhunLA
Posted
On 2/24/2024 at 8:12 PM, Pib said:

My BYD Atto 3 has a NEDC range rating of 480Km and a WLTP rating of 420Km.

Pib,

What kind of range do you think your Atto 3 will have if you hit the highway to Hua Hin an early morning and kept the speed at a constant 120 km/h?

Looks like the comfort zone for EVs are urban city speed of 20-60 km/h.

The Fortuner will of course be right at home at 120 km/h.

Screenshot_20240229_091852_Word.jpg

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, ExpatOilWorker said:

Pib,

What kind of range do you think your Atto 3 will have if you hit the highway to Hua Hin an early morning and kept the speed at a constant 120 km/h?

Looks like the comfort zone for EVs are urban city speed of 20-60 km/h.

The Fortuner will of course be right at home at 120 km/h.

Screenshot_20240229_091852_Word.jpg

 

Don't really know...somewhere south of 400km I'm sure.

 

Couldn't maintain 120kmh from Bangkok to HuaHin due to road conditions, speed limits, etc., at any time during the day or night.   Plus I wouldn't enjoy the speeding tickets via mail about a month later.

 

The Atto cruises at 120km smoother and quieter than the Fortuner.

 

The chart is skimpy on background info...got a web link that provide such?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, ExpatOilWorker said:

Pib,

What kind of range do you think your Atto 3 will have if you hit the highway to Hua Hin an early morning and kept the speed at a constant 120 km/h?

Looks like the comfort zone for EVs are urban city speed of 20-60 km/h.

The Fortuner will of course be right at home at 120 km/h.

Screenshot_20240229_091852_Word.jpg

silly post, again, as pointed out, congestion, construction & speed limits wouldn't allow 120 kph, along with traffic signals & intersection.

 

I do wonder sometimes if you've ever been to TH.

 

I can tell you I drive from PKK, 100 kms south of HH, to Bangkok with no problems, with our 50kWh (46.3 usable) battery pack.   I do stop & top up, unnecessarily before getting to my destination, as prefer to not need to top up again, until out of the metro area, whether further beyond, or returning home.

 

Also makes it easier to calculate, if returning home, to arrive @ 20%, and recharge at home with solar.  Which has worked consistently of late.

 

So the first 250-275 kms to BKK is on solar, and the last top up, back to 100% is also done with solar.   So 500-550 of those kms are on solar, for additional savings.

  • Sad 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
6 hours ago, KhunLA said:

The MG MAXUS 9 (van) is pretty awesome and very plush inside, with nice specs. 

 

The MG Maxus 9 stand was swamped at the motor show. Nobody at Kia ICE Mini Van display, so I couldn't resist asking "Rot Fai Far Mai Kap?" (Electric?) Then looking disappointed and walking away.

 

20230330_070709147_iOS.thumb.jpg.73b2cdce3ec5797007d924efe0a8108a.jpg20230330_070825426_iOS.thumb.jpg.0599746f738665d2b888f84122c46633.jpg20230330_070855678_iOS.thumb.jpg.c6e5ba3a086fd51f7a0adc393581527b.jpg20230330_070901269_iOS.thumb.jpg.3b9ac1dccc1d9eb073f135699ca9de50.jpg20230330_071024626_iOS.thumb.jpg.2eeeb4d9a9c3ba680cad77388fdec99f.jpg20230330_071125519_iOS.thumb.jpg.39947f254e69f6f190f5dc2ff731d3bc.jpg

20230330_071218701_iOS.thumb.jpg.2c20dc088c1af92e8f5365776e9f6f3d.jpg

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Pib said:

 

Don't really know...somewhere south of 400km I'm sure.

 

Couldn't maintain 120kmh from Bangkok to HuaHin due to road conditions, speed limits, etc., at any time during the day or night.   Plus I wouldn't enjoy the speeding tickets via mail about a month later.

 

The Atto cruises at 120km smoother and quieter than the Fortuner.

 

The chart is skimpy on background info...got a web link that provide such?

The full report, just for you.

 

matecconf_bultrans2017_06002.pdf

Posted
4 hours ago, Klonko said:

For comparison

Our OraGoodCat Ultra 500 has 500 km NDEC.

Real range A/C 26° @ ≤ 90 km/h on main roads 400 km.

Real range A/C 26° @ 120 km/h on motorway 280 km.

Real range A/C 26° @ ≈40 km/h in the mountains 500 km

The aerodynamics of the Ora GoodCat are not very good.

Very good and honest answer. Speed really is a range killer for EVs.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
6 hours ago, ExpatOilWorker said:

Pib,

What kind of range do you think your Atto 3 will have if you hit the highway to Hua Hin an early morning and kept the speed at a constant 120 km/h?

Looks like the comfort zone for EVs are urban city speed of 20-60 km/h.

The Fortuner will of course be right at home at 120 km/h.

Screenshot_20240229_091852_Word.jpg

lol.

The fortuna will be drinking like a camel @120kmh.

  • Agree 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:


EV’s are no different to ICE vehicles, wind resistance and aerodynamically take their toll.

 

The major difference is at very low speed or stationary, the IVE vehicle is burning a lot of fuel at (typically) 25% efficiency to keep the air conditioning, power steering and brakes operating,

 

Wind the speed up and they both use incremental energy identically.

The big difference is that the optimum speed is way higher for an ICE.

 

ehicle-energy-economy-at-different-speeds.png

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, HighPriority said:

lol.

The fortuna will be drinking like a camel @120kmh.

Have you ever owned a Fortuner or are you just making fact up as we go along?

 

13.6 km/l is pretty Impressive. 

 

Driving at an indicated 120 - 130 km/h and not using cruise control we achieved 7.3l/100km measured at the pumps on the down trip....trip computer also indicated the same.

 

https://www.4x4community.co.za/forum/showthread.php/328637-Fortuner-with-very-impressive-fuel-consumption

 

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, ExpatOilWorker said:

Have you ever owned a Fortuner or are you just making fact up as we go along?

 

13.6 km/l is pretty Impressive. 

 

Driving at an indicated 120 - 130 km/h and not using cruise control we achieved 7.3l/100km measured at the pumps on the down trip....trip computer also indicated the same.

 

https://www.4x4community.co.za/forum/showthread.php/328637-Fortuner-with-very-impressive-fuel-consumption

 

Do you own a fortuna or are you just cherry picking to suit your agenda ?

 

I drive a 2021 Toyota HiAce.

Diesel auto.

With a mix of 80/100kmh driving I get 9-9.5l/100km.

Stop start sends it up over 10, sitting on 130kmh sends it towards 12l/100km.

Towing any type of trailer sends it towards 12.

 

Edit: And towing 150kmh gets it up around 15-16l/100km

 

7.3l/100km @ 120+ is laughable.

Edited by HighPriority
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, HighPriority said:

lol.

The fortuna will be drinking like a camel @120kmh.

You mean it goes a long time without a drink? I regularly go 725-750km between fill-ups with mine. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Of course you do.

Last ten fill-ups:

Tuna.thumb.png.76216ded642bdd4ffd76dc9ea3e1c257.png

 

4 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

And you drive 700+ kms without a break.

Not so far in Thailand.

4 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

You are my hero.

Thanks, that means a lot coming from you. 

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...