Jump to content

Jan. 6 committee says probe shows Trump led and directed effort to overturn 2020 election


Recommended Posts

Posted
47 minutes ago, nauseus said:

And what do you think is being done to the USA right now that isn't damaging?

Perhaps you could tell what you believe is being done to the USA right now that is damaging?

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

So what is an insurrection if not an attempt to take over the government?

See, as I explained early in this thread, that's why I prefer not to use the word "insurrection," even though it is correct. It insinuates a next-step that may not be intended or attempted............ a "coup." - - - - - An attempt to overthrow of the government. 

 

But the word "insurrection" means a violent action taken with the goal of changing how the government operates. It doesn't necessarily mean the goal is to replace an existing government. 

 

Technically...... although the word is never used for them.......... the BLM and ANTIFA protests could ALSO correctly be called "insurrections"............. because they both clearly desired to affect a change in how the government operates. 

 

So no, "insurrection" and "overthrow"............ do not necessarily go together! They CAN, but they don't have to. 

 

Cheers! 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Phoenix Rising said:

trump bigly lost the election (by about 7 MILLION votes) so that's one thing that's not damaging; him in the WH.

Popular Vote means nothing. Our president is elected by thoroughly anti-democratic means: The Electoral College. 

 

Popular Vote defines whether a President has a mandate........... but it doesn't determine who becomes President. In roughly 10% of our Presidential Elections, the person who got fewer votes........... became President........... including two of the last three, before Biden. 

 

Fewer than 90,000 votes spread among three States determined the 2016 election...........because of the Electoral College system. Meanwhile, Hillary had "won" by 2.9 million votes.

 

If I recall, if 0.007% of the population had lived some place else.......... Hillary would have won!

 

????????????

 

Cheers! 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

The goal was to replace an elected President. In short, insurrection.

Until the Electoral Count was certified, Biden HADN'T BEEN "elected." The process wasn't complete, yet. Indeed, even though Joe Biden was being CALLED the "President-elect".......... he wasn't yet, actually. 

 

Of course, historically, none of these technical details mattered. You could label and mislabel to your heart's content.......... because what was technically untrue at one point........... invariably BECAME true at another point. 

 

And then came that moment of........... THERE'S A FIRST TIME FOR EVERYTHING! ????????????

 

By the way......... 

 

The President at the time of the "insurrection"........... was Donald Trump. The "insurrection" had no goal of changing that! ????????????

 

Cheers! 

Posted
1 hour ago, KanchanaburiGuy said:

Popular Vote means nothing. Our president is elected by thoroughly anti-democratic means: The Electoral College. 

 

Popular Vote defines whether a President has a mandate........... but it doesn't determine who becomes President. In roughly 10% of our Presidential Elections, the person who got fewer votes........... became President........... including two of the last three, before Biden. 

 

Fewer than 90,000 votes spread among three States determined the 2016 election...........because of the Electoral College system. Meanwhile, Hillary had "won" by 2.9 million votes.

 

If I recall, if 0.007% of the population had lived some place else.......... Hillary would have won!

 

????????????

 

Cheers! 

Best thing posted on this subject so far. Thanks.

Posted

Off-topic post with unapproved source removed along with a conspiracy post.  Stay on topic. 

Posted
8 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

So to be clear, a couple hundred guys "heavily" armed with pepper-spray, baseball-bats, stun-guns and broken flag-poles were going to take over the United States Government.

 

It is interesting that generally the same people that argue this is true, are arguing in other thread that semi-automatic fire-arms would be useless against the United States Government.  

No, they were going to prevent the certification of the results of a legitimate election.

 

They were going to do this by overwhelming the security of the Capitol, capturing Mike Pence and a large number of Senators and Representatives, and use them as hostages to prevent the Capitol from being retaken.

 

They believed Trump's lie about a stolen election and hoped the country and military would rally to their cause.  They were idiots, but that doesn't change the fact that they attacked the US Capitol with the intent of preventing the electoral college certification and preventing the transfer of power.

  • Like 2
Posted
10 hours ago, KanchanaburiGuy said:

See, as I explained early in this thread, that's why I prefer not to use the word "insurrection," even though it is correct. It insinuates a next-step that may not be intended or attempted............ a "coup." - - - - - An attempt to overthrow of the government. 

 

But the word "insurrection" means a violent action taken with the goal of changing how the government operates. It doesn't necessarily mean the goal is to replace an existing government. 

 

Technically...... although the word is never used for them.......... the BLM and ANTIFA protests could ALSO correctly be called "insurrections"............. because they both clearly desired to affect a change in how the government operates. 

 

So no, "insurrection" and "overthrow"............ do not necessarily go together! They CAN, but they don't have to. 

 

Cheers! 

So by your definition voting could also be called insurrection, that's pretty convenient. 

Posted
31 minutes ago, bocaBob said:

At this point it appears that this committee is doing it's level best to attack Trump's character and not present evidence of seditious intent so far however this committee is focused on criminal charges for whatever they can tweak out from AG.

This committee has had sworn testimony providing first hand accounts of Trump's actions following the election.  How is that attacking his character?

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

So by your definition voting could also be called insurrection, that's pretty convenient. 

Please read again. I said "a violent action," so voting wouldn't fit the description. And I would have assumed that "contrary to the normal processes" would have been automatically understood, therefore not need to be explained. Guess I was wrong, Hmmm? 

 

Cheers! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...