Jump to content

Trump under investigation for potential violations of Espionage Act


Scott

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, Tippaporn said:

You folks just don't get it that there are people in this world who actually are after the real truth.  Whether it goes against Trump or not.  Some here believe anything.  Anything at all as long as it confirms their Orange Man Bad bias.  And if one doesn't agree and doesn't hop on the already overcrowded band wagon then that must mean we're all loony conspiracy theory nuts or Trump sycophants.  Much of the world vehemently rejects your false pronunciations.

Riddle me this, Lacessit.  Why did Newsweek come out with an article quoting two anonymous high level DOJ sources who said they were cleared to state that the DOJ had no knowledge of the raid.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/newsweek-blasted-incorrectly-claiming-merrick-garland-didnt-know-about-fbis-trump-raid

And Garland doesn't immediately issue a denial.  And it took him how long to finally make a public statement?  But not answer any questions?  Nothing to see here, right?

But do give some educated thought to your idea that anyone who sticks up for what they believe is right is automatically a Trump sycophant.  Is that the scientific method you've been taught?

Talking about seeking "the real truth" while quoting Fox news.

 

YCMTSU

 

Here's the offer, I won't quote CNN if you don't quote Fox News.

 

Deal?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Nothing to do with the Dems. Why court controversy while they are celebrating their big win.

 

DeSantis approval rating in Florida on top but nationwide Trump still much ahead. That’s the GOP dilemma going into the mid term. 

It seems to me that everything depends upon ratings. They are 'king'.

 

Praise here, discredit there. Nancy went to Taiwan for that very reason.

 

What happened to the Epstein vids? A lot of levering going on.

Edited by owl sees all
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Tippaporn said:

Since you're on the left and I assume you don't touch base with those on the right then justifiably you would have no idea how this blunder by the DOJ and FBI has galvanised those on the right.  I've said it before; I think this is one of the best things that could have happened in a long time.  People are fired up like never before.  Keep waking up that sleeping giant, I say.

You made a claim in your post which I highlighted.  Explain this then:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-fundraising-fbi-raid-b2141864.html

Explain what? This?

 

“Nothing like this has ever happened to a President of the United States before, and it’s important that you know it wasn’t just my home that was violated — it was the home of every patriotic American who I have been fighting for since that iconic moment I came down the Golden Escalators in 2015,”

 

I'll try, but I've just been a little bit sick in my mouth.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, BusyB said:
17 hours ago, NanLaew said:

In the grand scheme of classified document hierarchy, the stuff marked "TS/SCI" is actually a Wendy's Triple Burger with Cheese and Bacon served with Large Fries and a Jumbo Coke (to go).

The really sensitive stuff is so sensitive it's not listed. Because even knowledge of it could be dangerous if someone else has a couple of other pieces of the puzzle.

Hey, steady on.

 

The Freemason's aren't THAT bad.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Trump was President, not King a distinction that might cause confusion to subjects of a crown.

The story of King Donald, and his amazing ability to turn everything he touches into declassified material.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

The case is being built and will be iron clad when he is arrested and then charged. Not guilty as of yet but damning evidence of guilt is being obtained daily. Or do you Trump defenders think it's all politics.....

If the authorities can find enough evidence to charge him with some crime, then the case goes to court, there is a fair trial, the jury decide on guilty or not guilty, then that's all fine. If guilty the Judge decides his fate?

However currently we have the MSM, social media, members on this forum etc deciding his guilt before any of the due process has taken place, which to me seems irrational and disturbing.

Its not a case of defending Trump, but everyone should be the given the chance to due process.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Walker88 said:

It took 5 days for 45's "Brain Trust" (sic) to come up with that ludicrous excuse? That is the best they can do?

 

One would have to have the IQ of a turnip to believe it, though I guess that means around 80% of his cult is on board.

Well actually it was Rudy who came up with it while into his third bottle of red.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, 2baht said:
21 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Can't lock up someone who hasn't been charged with anything!

Did'nt the same clown want to lock Hillary up without charge?

No.  That was a Presidential campaign "chant"; he, obviously, was in no position to lock up anyone.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, heybruce said:

Having worked with classified below the TS/SCI level, I have some grasp of the seriousness of having TS/SCI in a non-secure location.

 

I agree that Trump is entitled to the presumption of innocence.  However the fact that nobody is contesting the fact that Trump took TS/SCI from the White House, did not return it in when other documents were returned, and kept such highly classified documents in a non-secure location is pretty damning.

What you say is fair enough. If that is in fact what happened? If the evidence is so damming then surely the DOJ can charge him? As yet as far as I know he hasn't been charged with anything.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mikeymike100 said:

What you say is fair enough. If that is in fact what happened? If the evidence is so damming then surely the DOJ can charge him? As yet as far as I know he hasn't been charged with anything.

You're in a hurry to have Trump charged?

 

I don't think Trump is a flight risk.  Considering the nature of this case, I have no problem with the FBI and Justice Department working carefully to build their cases before deciding on charges and arrests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, placeholder said:

"Of the 30,000 emails that the FBI examined, eight were found to contain Top Secret information. Seven of them were about CIA drone strikes, which had been reported in the newspapers (but were still technically classified). The other one was an account of a telephone conversation with the president of Malawi."

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/08/what-is-in-trump-mar-a-lago-documents.html

"Of the 30,000 emails that the FBI examined..."

In addition to those emails, the other 31,830 that she deemed "personal" that she deleted so they could not be examined by the authorities should not be forgotten.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, heybruce said:

You're in a hurry to have Trump charged?

 

I don't think Trump is a flight risk.  Considering the nature of this case, I have no problem with the FBI and Justice Department working carefully to build their cases before deciding on charges and arrests.

I am not in a hurry to have Trump charged at all, although I suspect some are?

I am in agreement with you that the FBI and DOJ need to tread carefully

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, heybruce said:

When did Hunter Biden become President?

 

Also, what about this presumption of innocence stuff we keep hearing about?  Do you know what is on that laptop and what laws were broken?

Since you've edited your post since I quoted it . . .

"Is everyone who might run for President exempt from criminal investigations, or only Trump?"

Criminal investigations, not presumptions of guilt was what you stated.  Don't conveniently change the subject.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Tropposurfer said:

This handing over of the self to another in the case of MAGA and the Republican Party to Trump is predicated on a recognition by these folks in Trump of what is in them i.e. xenophobia, racism, anti-semitism, misogyny, fear of never-enough, greed, lust for power, and insatiable need for more and more, sadism, masochism, rage, neurotic needs around control, and a shopping-list of other neuroses, repressions and suppressions.

Well said and IMO so true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, stevenl said:
21 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No.  That was a Presidential campaign "chant"; he, obviously, was in no position to lock up anyone.   

So it's ok for him to say it and sweep up a crowd, but when people on here say the same, in a clear reference to his words, you're calling them out.

Biased much?

No, I'm not "calling them out", I'm just pointing out that he has not been charged with anything.   

 

"Biased much?"

Hypocritical "much"?   By "biased" I suppose you mean that I have an opinion that may not match yours, yes?  I'm an individual and I do not have to be "unbiased", just as you, clearly, are not.  Perhaps you're doing a "Thaivisa" and  suggesting that I shouldn't be biased but it's ok for you to be?

Edited by Liverpool Lou
  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...