Jump to content

US English teacher arrested for sexual relation with 16 y/o student


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Spock said:

America can take action against any citizen having underage sex overseas as can Australia. 

But she is not underage in Thailand.............????

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted

As I posted here months ago...the GFs older brother up in Isaan was dating a 16 year old and recently married her.  Open relationship everyone knew about it including the parents.  Whole village showed up for the wedding. 

 

He is in his fifties.  Why have a busload of senior ranking police not showed up to arrest him?

 

Everything is about money here in Thailand.  Everything.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 hours ago, webfact said:

"taking a minor who is over 15 years old but not exceeding 18 years old away from their parents, guardian, or caretaker without reasonable cause, willingly and intentionally."

So as I understand it, he is not charged for having consensual sex, but for keeping her away from her family?

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Hummin said:

Conclusion, it is not the money or the desire to teach subjects to the students for Male teachers, it is the sex.

Strange mind set! Teaching in the uk is quite well paid with both excellent working conditions and pension so a very strange statement. Like a lot of career choices it is a vocation which can give great satisfaction seeing your students excel under your guidance. Please don't tar them with gutter mentality!

  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted (edited)

I searched this guy from google and he has linkedin page where it says he has MBA etc. I guess this level of education can still bring huge amount of stupidity. I cannot understand how someone can be this stupid. Also filming this... What he was thinking? He lost his public image and that is way worse than fine or some jail time. He will always be that dirty pedophile even the girl was already 16.

Edited by Topah
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, BritScot said:

Strange mind set! Teaching in the uk is quite well paid with both excellent working conditions and pension so a very strange statement. Like a lot of career choices it is a vocation which can give great satisfaction seeing your students excel under your guidance. Please don't tar them with gutter mentality!

Again, it was a reply to britmans post

 

6 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Former Brit wife worked in a 6th form college back in the UK.

She said nearly all the single male teachers were dating students.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, impulse said:

According to the article, the charge was:  "taking a minor who is over 15 years old but not exceeding 18 years old away from their parents, guardian, or caretaker without reasonable cause, willingly and intentionally." 

 

Sounds to me like sex wasn't even required to hit him with that charge.

 

Details matter...

He had filmed a previous encounter with her, and was found filming this one

Possibly selling on "dark web" , there is very large market for under age sex videos, several thousand consumers of online under vidoes arrest over past few years, material made and sold across the globe.

 

  • Sad 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
10 hours ago, retarius said:

Well I suppose money and fame are not enough for some people. The desire to act out paedophilic fantasy is strong in some folk. I wish him all the best in Thai prison, maybe he can get a GoFundMe page?

It's not a pedophilic fantasy, I don't wish to defend the teachers actions; due to the fact that he was in a position of responsibility which he abused. My father married mother at the age of 16. 

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
10 hours ago, ikke1959 said:

The question is how old is the teacher.. On the picture he doesn't seems so old, so it could be a normal situation, although it is not good to have a relation with a student. But look at president Macron of France .. he married his teacher

I'm not sure I would hold up Macron, or France for that matter, as the beacon we should aspire to. (No insult to our French brethren intended)

Posted

The article says, "on charges of "taking a minor who is over 15 years old but not exceeding 18 years old away from their parents, guardian, or caretaker without reasonable cause, willingly and intentionally." 

 

I think his charges are a bit more than the act of intercourse with his student.

  • Sad 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, transam said:

But she is not underage in Thailand.............????

He is being charged with "on charges of "taking a minor who is over 15 years old but not exceeding 18 years old away from their parents, guardian, or caretaker without reasonable cause, willingly and intentionally." ... I do not know, but is sound different than sex with a minor??

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Iamloki said:

The article says, "on charges of "taking a minor who is over 15 years old but not exceeding 18 years old away from their parents, guardian, or caretaker without reasonable cause, willingly and intentionally." 

 

I think his charges are a bit more than the act of intercourse with his student.

They are actually a bit less ..........

Around the same fine as failing to stop at an accident, 5kbht.

 

He didn't have sex with a minor.

Age of consent is 15 for unmarried girls, and 13 for married girls.

Edited by BritManToo
  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

Macron was adult when their relationship began, the student is 16 years age, student being the operative word. Teachers have a professional responsibility towards students

The teacher is in a position of power over the student, so the age difference is immaterial

 

I know... trainers /teachers/bosses/ etc and pupils have ethics and are not allowed with their pupils... But on the other hand it happens... falling in love with a teacher/trainer or someone who has authority over you..... 

Posted
9 hours ago, retarius said:

I am well aware of what paedophila is. It is a psychiatric term that came in to popular usage. It is defined differently by psychiatrists and in the law and popular usage.

 

Psychiatry defines it as a mental illness where there is sole sexual interest in pre-pubertal children. It is not a crime, unless the fantasies are acted upon.

 

Common popular usage in the MSM and elsewhere, defines it as sex with minors below the age of majority. Age of majority varies from country to country. In the UK it is 16, in the US it is 18 and in Thailand I believe it is 20.

 

The guy is American, it is a crime in the US for a US citizen to have sex with a minor. The crime is statutory rape and carries a seven years sentence. They are aka sex pests and have to report to the police where they are living or sign the sex offenders register. The crime is often popularly referred to as pedophilia and the convicts are referred to as pedos or pedophiles, and this includes anyone having sex with minors irrespective of whether the minor was pre-pubertal.

 

 

Total BS. I met my Thai wife when she was 19 now 31, there was no suggestion that this was illegal.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

They are actually a bit less ..........

Around the same fine as failing to stop at an accident, 5kbht.

 

He didn't have sex with a minor.

Age of consent is 15 for unmarried girls, and 13 for married girls.

Read the case of Big Ass...

 

Ekarat Wongcharat, the leading vocal of Big Ass, made the headlines when a 17 year old men's magazine model nicknamed "Fai" appeared with her baby "Justin" and claimed that Wongcharat was the baby's father in February 2006. Allegedly they had sex when Fai was 16 years old, meaning that Wongcharat would be a child sex offender if the accusation was true. Wongcharat was subsequently arrested and released on bail on 27 February. While Wongcharat gave his blood sample for DNA testing in March, Fai and Justin did not give theirs until early May. On 10 May 2006 police announced that the result was negative. A retest performed by Khunying Pornthip Rojanasunand drew the same conclusion. Even through he is not the child's father, the trial for the underage sex offense remained. The trial began on 13 February 2007 and the court decision was announced on 21 March 2007. He received two years of a suspended sentence and must produce two anti-drug songs as pledged by the singer in exchange for a light sentence.[16][17]

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ass

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

They are actually a bit less ..........

Around the same fine as failing to stop at an accident, 5kbht.

 

He didn't have sex with a minor.

Age of consent is 15 for unmarried girls, and 13 for married girls.

I think you missed some key points. You need to reread the article and the charges he is facing. And if you think it is OK for a mid 20s teacher to film himself having sex with a 16 perhaps 15 year old student and remove her from her home against her parent's wishes, you are clearly deluding yourself regarding the implications of this situation for the ticktocker.

Posted
1 minute ago, Spock said:

I think you missed some key points. You need to reread the article and the charges he is facing. And if you think it is OK for a mid 20s teacher to film himself having sex with a 16 perhaps 15 year old student and remove her from her home against her parent's wishes, you are clearly deluding yourself regarding the implications of this situation for the ticktocker.

As I previously posted, no sleepovers and he would have had no problem.

Letting her move in for 5+ months without the parents permission caused him the problem.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, transam said:

You just want to bury a farangy for having a GF.....................:stoner:

What do you think of King Charles III meeting his wife at 16...?

Charles planned to have sex with a foreign teen under his tutelage casually then maybe dump her and go back to his country? No, just in the royal tradition courtship would be publicly recognized. Did her family have any objection? Of course he then could go on with his social life. Not an apt comparison. 

Edited by Captain Monday
Posted
57 minutes ago, Spock said:

Do your research. It does not matter. Don't know why you are defending this sleaze given the video he made, the age at which he recruited her, the fact he is her teacher and the parents' complaints. Not to mention the complaints and dismissal from a previous school.

I am not as nosey as you, it is a thread, ol' chap.............????

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, Captain Monday said:

Charles planned to have sex with a foreign teen under his tutelage casually then maybe dump her and go back to his country? No, just in the royal tradition courtship would be publicly recognized. Did her family have any objection? Of course he then could go on with his social life. Not an apt comparison. 

I thought it was, 2 blokes, both with todgers, and both had "friendships" with females of the same age..............????

  • Confused 2
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...