Jump to content

Court rules Move Forward attempted to topple constitutional monarchy


Recommended Posts

Posted

Screenshot-2024-01-31-152009.png

Β 

The Constitutional Court today unanimously ruled that the Β Move Forward Party and its former leader Pita Limjaroenrat have attempted to overthrow the constitutional monarchy by campaigning to amend the lese majeste law or Article 112 and ordered them to cease all activities related to it.

Β 

While the court did not decide whether the reformist party should be disbanded, the ruling is likely to pave the way for subsequent legal efforts to have the party dissolved.

Β 

The case stemmed from a petition by lawyer Theerayut Suwankesorn in July last year, accusing the party and its then-leader Pita of seeking to overthrow Thailand’s constitutional monarchy.

Β 

Full story:Β Thai PBSΒ 2024-01-31

Β 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plansΒ click here.

Β 

Get our Daily Newsletter - ClickΒ HEREΒ to subscribe

Β 

Join us now!

  • Heart-broken 22
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

That's the way it is. That's the way it'll stay. Forever. MFP did not have the talent maneuver politically. They put themselves in a trap. Election Commission will follow up and ban the party and Pita.Β 

  • Heart-broken 5
  • Love It 1
Posted

Very sad day for Thailand, and their so called democracy... Laws should have the possibility to be amended.. Updates are needed to keep on in recent times.. Law for death penalty is also out of date and new laws as samesex marriage are being brought in... I am sure Thailand will pay a price for this verdict No TAT can prevent thatΒ 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Heart-broken 1
Posted

Another dad day for Thailand.Β  They just trickle out the bad things in small bites like a python in its final act.Β 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

The "permanently offended " communityΒ  seem to have taken aΒ  dislike to some valid words in the english language.Β  Β Note how they typicallyΒ  issue instructionsΒ  as to what words they personallyΒ  think should be used.Β  Β The use of a word like "disgusting" is nothing more than a predictable tacticΒ  toΒ  take the moral high ground,and indulge in a bit of virtue signalling,Β  Whilst at the same time vilifying another poster for making a perfectly appropriate comment.Β  A relativelyΒ  new divisionΒ  of theΒ  grammar policeΒ Β 

Β 

I think there's an age aspect to that too: People under about 50 or maybe 60 and not much education use the word 'peasant' as a term of abuse ...

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...