Jump to content

The Impeachment's Russia Connection: Unraveling a Fabricated Tale


Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Some posters here still don't seem to understand or believe this news.

That's because there are lingering doubts that Smirnov's allegations are false. There is also the issue regarding the nature of the Bidens' Ukrainian and Chinese connections. All of which may be of no substance, but should be more thoroughly investigated if only to clear the Bidens of any wrongdoing.

  • Confused 3
  • Sad 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Foxx said:


Surely not "informant" since the information he provided was a pack of lies.  Maybe "misinformant"?

I have a weakness for alliteration... I'll call Smirnov an FBI fabulist.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

 

Unfortunately these cowards are speaking from a protected position, safe from defamation lawsuits.


This is not about defamation. This is (potentially) about conspiracy to interfere in an election. Not sure they are protected if those charges were brought against them. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Some posters here still don't seem to understand or believe this news.

Some posters here still don't seem to understand or believe this news these lies!

  • Like 2
  • Confused 2
Posted
1 hour ago, rudi49jr said:


This is not about defamation. This is (potentially) about conspiracy to interfere in an election. Not sure they are protected if those charges were brought against them. 

The Speech and Debate clause protects Comer and Jordan against anything they say in Congress.

Posted
5 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

 

In the hypothetical scenario mentioned here, if there were credible evidence that Representatives Comer and Jordan conspired to help a foreign power intervene in an election, I would suggest this would likely fall outside the scope of their legislative activities and could potentially be subject to investigation and criminal prosecution.

This is similar to the reason why Trump already lost his immunity appeal in the 2020 Election Interference case.

 I would also suggest that the clause does not protect members of Congress from impeachment proceedings.
 

Nothing protects members of Congress from impeachment proceedings.

 

As for indictment, it would require overcoming a very high evidentiary bar.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

When the person who made the allegations has confessed to making them up, now you are verging on being delusional.

IMO; When the person who made the allegations has confessed to making them up, now you are verging on being extremely delusional.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

should be more thoroughly investigated if only to clear the Bidens of any wrongdoing.

IF so how about a through investigation of the Trump crime family et al benefiting from foreign powers during Trump's administration? When dies the rule of law supply yo them?

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

As for indictment, it would require overcoming a very high evidentiary bar.

Which might not be that high going by some of the "unattributed" info being published!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...