1 hour ago, Phulublub said:

But I am asking you.  Why are you so reticent to say?

 

PH

Read my post again 

13 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

 

So trans men aren't real men? It's a pretty straight forward yes or no question.

YES!

Trans "so called men" are self identifying as non men!

9 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Read my post again 

Why?

Are you getting paid for clickbait?

 

 

PS; If so take this post as your 0.005Satang!

PPS;  Just looked at it out of curiosity!  I suggest nobody bothers as it is meaningless!

4 hours ago, Will B Good said:

Good heavens......I've read some stupid statements in my time......but that deserves a rosette....🏵️

You have noticed who it is from haven't you?

Give him one rosette for his one sided consistency!

24 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Read my post again 

In your recent posts you have quoted Fox News.  twice.  And nothing else.  So that is where you get all your information?

 

PH

1 hour ago, heybruce said:

Yes, but Republicans, including Trump, are more likely to increase deficits on their watch.  Democrats are more likely to reverse them.

 

Do you recall the Republican panic early in the George W. Bush Presidency regarding the small budget surplus the Clinton administration left them?  They were actually arguing for more deficit spending, then they delivered big time.

“yes, but Republicans, including Trump, are more likely to increase deficits on their watch”

 

And I’m sure you have the stats on how much was added by Obama phones.

 

How much will be added for student loans forgiveness and reparations for never slaves owned by never masters.

 

I’m sure you have the stats in USD on  how much military weapons, hardware and infrastructure was abandoned in Afghanistan.

 

I can add more but we’ll see what numbers you come up with.  Don’t want to overwork you.

 

 

34 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Why?

Are you getting paid for clickbait?

 

 

PS; If so take this post as your 0.005Satang!

PPS;  Just looked at it out of curiosity!  I suggest nobody bothers as it is meaningless!

 
2 seconds of my life I can never, ever get back!

4 hours ago, Roo Island said:

Post a link or you're trolling. Again. It'd be great if you went away.

Where exactly would or should I go?

 

 I love it here and I love you!

 

More than Bruce,  hopefully he’s not the jealous type.

The prospect of a second Trump presidency has intelligent people on edge.

23 minutes ago, Phulublub said:

In your recent posts you have quoted Fox News.  twice.  And nothing else.  So that is where you get all your information?

 

PH

See, how hard was that!  I’m proud of you!

23 minutes ago, G_Money said:

I’m sure you have the stats in USD on  how much military weapons, hardware and infrastructure was abandoned in Afghanistan.

Was this because trump signed an order/agreement to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan.......

 

In February 2020, the Trump administration and the Taliban signed the United States–Taliban deal in Doha, Qatar,^[7] which stipulated fighting restrictions for both the US and the Taliban, and provided for the withdrawal of all NATO forces from Afghanistan in return for the Taliban's counter-terrorism commitments.

 

trump signed off on the US withdrawal, so sheet it back to him. It did not help that the US military made a hash of it, the same military which served both trump and Biden.

On 2/27/2024 at 8:56 AM, EVENKEEL said:

It's ironic how when one retires his prior employment becomes so much more exciting than what reality really was. I'll bet you're a hero in all your afternoon naps.

I bet you can tell a joke or two, at a party, eh? nudge-nudge wink wink. say no more.

18 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said:

The prospect of a second Trump presidency has intelligent people on edge.

Thankfully his supporters are not intelligent people, especially if we go by the ones posting here!

I do not believe that there are enough idiots/non intelligent voters in the USA who cannot look at what he did last time and what he is doing now and even think of electing it!

15 minutes ago, xylophone said:

Was this because trump signed an order/agreement to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan.......

 

In February 2020, the Trump administration and the Taliban signed the United States–Taliban deal in Doha, Qatar,^[7] which stipulated fighting restrictions for both the US and the Taliban, and provided for the withdrawal of all NATO forces from Afghanistan in return for the Taliban's counter-terrorism commitments.

 

trump signed off on the US withdrawal, so sheet it back to him. It did not help that the US military made a hash of it, the same military which served both trump and Biden.

Nice try !

 

Withdraw and taking what we owned with us vs leaving it all behind like the fool Biden.

 

Still haven’t answered the question of total USD added to the deficit by giving them the gift that never stops giving.

48 minutes ago, G_Money said:

“yes, but Republicans, including Trump, are more likely to increase deficits on their watch”

 

And I’m sure you have the stats on how much was added by Obama phones.

 

How much will be added for student loans forgiveness and reparations for never slaves owned by never masters.

 

I’m sure you have the stats in USD on  how much military weapons, hardware and infrastructure was abandoned in Afghanistan.

 

I can add more but we’ll see what numbers you come up with.  Don’t want to overwork you.

 

 

Poor deflection.

 

We are talking federal deficits.  Not future expenses, not down in the dirt details.  Annual federal deficit history, which shows that both parties are bad, but Republicans are the ones who increase deficits and Democrats the ones who decrease deficits at the end of their time in office.  When Democrats are enter office after Republicans turned the US economy into an economic basket case, as Obama did when he took over from Bush, some initial deficit increases are warranted, but then they come down dramatically.

 

Here's a picture for you if you want proof:  https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFSD

22 minutes ago, xylophone said:

Was this because trump signed an order/agreement to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan.......

 

In February 2020, the Trump administration and the Taliban signed the United States–Taliban deal in Doha, Qatar,^[7] which stipulated fighting restrictions for both the US and the Taliban, and provided for the withdrawal of all NATO forces from Afghanistan in return for the Taliban's counter-terrorism commitments.

 

trump signed off on the US withdrawal, so sheet it back to him. It did not help that the US military made a hash of it, the same military which served both trump and Biden.

Yup, Trump's fault. Next!

12 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Thankfully his supporters are not intelligent people, especially if we go by the ones posting here!

I do not believe that there are enough idiots/non intelligent voters in the USA who cannot look at what he did last time and what he is doing now and even think of electing it!

What did he do last time that you did not like? 

19 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Thankfully his supporters are not intelligent people, especially if we go by the ones posting here!

I do not believe that there are enough idiots/non intelligent voters in the USA who cannot look at what he did last time and what he is doing now and even think of electing it!

I see you survived Trump’s last presidency.  How is your life different today under Biden?

 

 I know you’re paying more for groceries and gasoline today. 
 

I could say you’re portfolio took a dive during Biden’s first few years despite doing better today.

 

I say could but won’t because the markets go up and down for various reasons regardless of who is President.  Cyclical, similar to Global Warming.

7 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Nice try !

 

Withdraw and taking what we owned with us vs leaving it all behind like the fool Biden.

 

Still haven’t answered the question of total USD added to the deficit by giving them the gift that never stops giving.

Sheet it back to humpty trumpty........he was responsible for starting the withdrawal debacle by signing an agreement with the TALIBAN; and how did that turn out??

9 minutes ago, heybruce said:

Poor deflection.

 

We are talking federal deficits.  Not future expenses, not down in the dirt details.  Annual federal deficit history, which shows that both parties are bad, but Republicans are the ones who increase deficits and Democrats the ones who decrease deficits at the end of their time in office.  When Democrats are enter office after Republicans turned the US economy into an economic basket case, as Obama did when he took over from Bush, some initial deficit increases are warranted, but then they come down dramatically.

 

Here's a picture for you if you want proof:  https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFSD

Deflection?  Lol

 

Fancy explanation that doesn’t answer my question.

 

 

43 minutes ago, G_Money said:

See, how hard was that!  I’m proud of you!

So your sole source of unbiased, factual, real information is Fox News.  Enough said

 

PH

2 minutes ago, xylophone said:

Sheet it back to humpty trumpty........he was responsible for starting the withdrawal debacle by signing an agreement with the TALIBAN; and how did that turn out??

You saw the clusterf— on TV under Biden the same way I did.  If he would of followed Trump’s guidelines what we saw would not of happened.

 

Especially the weapons and hardware and more importantly lost American lives.

 

29 minutes ago, xylophone said:

Was this because trump signed an order/agreement to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan.......

 

In February 2020, the Trump administration and the Taliban signed the United States–Taliban deal in Doha, Qatar,^[7] which stipulated fighting restrictions for both the US and the Taliban, and provided for the withdrawal of all NATO forces from Afghanistan in return for the Taliban's counter-terrorism commitments.

 

trump signed off on the US withdrawal, so sheet it back to him. It did not help that the US military made a hash of it, the same military which served both trump and Biden.

To make sure the peace deal would be easy to negotiate, Trump did not include the Afghanistan government in his negotiation of the Afghanistan "peace" deal. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-taliban-peace-deal-agreement-afghanistan-war

 

Can Trump supporters understand why that was a bad idea?

1 minute ago, heybruce said:

To make sure the peace deal would be easy to negotiate, Trump did not include the Afghanistan government in his negotiation of the Afghanistan "peace" deal. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-taliban-peace-deal-agreement-afghanistan-war

 

Can Trump supporters understand why that was a bad idea?

Because Trump

5 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Deflection?  Lol

 

Fancy explanation that doesn’t answer my question.

 

 

Do you mean that even the pretty graph was beyond your comprehension?  Wow!

2 minutes ago, G_Money said:

You saw the clusterf— on TV under Biden the same way I did.  If he would of followed Trump’s guidelines what we saw would not of happened.

 

Especially the weapons and hardware and more importantly lost American lives.

 

What guidelines were these?

On 2/28/2024 at 3:20 PM, Dolf said:

Trump won 10 out of the last 11 polls. Biden is finished. Old puppet put in place by the deep state to keep the money flowing and wars going.

I watched Trump at one of his recent rallies, on Fox (courtesy of Youtube). To quote him: 'the last election was stolen from us and we're not going to let the 2024 election get stolen again'.  This is a con man speaking, a circus ring master. He ADMITTED that he lost the 2020 election ( to a man you call senile). But his personality disorder is so screwed up, he cannot 'man up' as you Americans say, and admit it, in public, to his fans. It is difficult to understand how sane people can consider him a safe pair of hands to look after the future of the USA, in a world where the main players include Putin, Kim, Xi. I love them...they love me. As the frmer intelligence officer described Trump, at CIA headquarters - ''me-me-me-me-me-me-me ''.

 

 

2 minutes ago, heybruce said:

Do you mean that even the pretty graph was beyond your comprehension?  Wow!

You believe everything the government tells you on a graph/stats.  I prefer real people, real stories.

 

 Still haven’t answered my questions.

 

But that ok, I knew you wouldn’t.

9 minutes ago, heybruce said:

What guidelines were these?

Consult with xylophone .  He has all the information.

28 minutes ago, heybruce said:

Poor deflection.

 

We are talking federal deficits.  Not future expenses, not down in the dirt details.  Annual federal deficit history, which shows that both parties are bad, but Republicans are the ones who increase deficits and Democrats the ones who decrease deficits at the end of their time in office.  When Democrats are enter office after Republicans turned the US economy into an economic basket case, as Obama did when he took over from Bush, some initial deficit increases are warranted, but then they come down dramatically.

 

Here's a picture for you if you want proof:  https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFSD

Posted October, 2023 under Biden’s administration.

 

What on earth did you expect it to say other than their biased opinion.