The prospect of a second Trump presidency has the intelligence community on edge

[Tug]

26 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Perhaps those concerned about their own prospects when Trump wins should be investigating alternative countries in which to live. Thailand is a friendly option, though finding work may be a problem.

Sorry to wreck your trumpian fantasy but trump ain’t gonna win not a snowballs chance in hell first off this administration has done a remarkable job especially considering the conditions they received the country from under trumps deadly train wreck of an administration (that’s putting it nicely btw)all that aside just think of what his appointees did to women they ain’t happy believe me and they vote.not to mention trump now has his daughter in law in charge of the rnc they will grift that dry leaving nothing for down ballot candidates……..naa trump ain’t gonna be pres.more like an inmate anyway on topic I’m sure trump will receive watered down intelligence at best because it’s fact he can’t be trusted,it wouldn’t surprise me a bit if there may be markers in his briefs to see if he’s passing it on…..don’t know but it wouldn’t surprise me one bit

[Hawaiian]

4 hours ago, Tug said:

Sorry to wreck your trumpian fantasy but trump ain’t gonna win not a snowballs chance in hell first off this administration has done a remarkable job especially considering the conditions they received the country from under trumps deadly train wreck of an administration (that’s putting it nicely btw)all that aside just think of what his appointees did to women they ain’t happy believe me and they vote.not to mention trump now has his daughter in law in charge of the rnc they will grift that dry leaving nothing for down ballot candidates……..naa trump ain’t gonna be pres.more like an inmate anyway on topic I’m sure trump will receive watered down intelligence at best because it’s fact he can’t be trusted,it wouldn’t surprise me a bit if there may be markers in his briefs to see if he’s passing it on…..don’t know but it wouldn’t surprise me one bit

There was a similar situation in 2015 when many thought Hillary was a shoo-in.

Rather brave of you calling the election with still 8 months to go.

 

[Roo Island]

1 hour ago, Hawaiian said:

There was a similar situation in 2015 when many thought Hillary was a shoo-in.

Rather brave of you calling the election with still 8 months to go.

 

For sure, a long way to go. And many court cases.

[Hawaiian]

1 hour ago, Roo Island said:

For sure, a long way to go. And many court cases.

Many challenges for both sides.

[earlinclaifornia]

4 hours ago, Hawaiian said:

There was a similar situation in 2015 when many thought Hillary was a shoo-in.

Rather brave of you calling the election with still 8 months to go.

 

The results in 2020 though were dead on. The closer we get to November 5th the more we will know about both 

[Roo Island]

5 hours ago, Hawaiian said:

Many challenges for both sides.

What court cases is Biden facing?

[Roo Island]

3 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

The results in 2020 though were dead on. The closer we get to November 5th the more we will know about both 

Trump lost the popular vote. Sadly. Many trumpers won't accept it. Bizarre

[beautifulthailand99]

On 2/27/2024 at 6:16 AM, paul1804 said:

Who do you think arranged and covered up the assassination of JFK and the reasons why are exactly why Trump  would reshape US intelligence agencies. Who do you think was behind the invasion of Iraq knowing the lie that Iraq was producing weapons of mass destruction?

What do you really believe happened in the 9/11 tragedy, 3,000 plus US citizens killed?? 

 

Lets hope Trump gets reelected so the world can be a better place!

These days here I honestly no longer know what is biting satire or batsh&t crazy. Or maybe the latter is the natural order of the world and after a period of rationality is reverting to type. Make Trump Great Again should be his real slogan. If he does win, what does that say about America as a great nation ?

[Hawaiian]

3 hours ago, Roo Island said:

What court cases is Biden facing?

Why does a challenge mean a court case? 

[thaibeachlovers]

14 hours ago, Roo Island said:

For sure, a long way to go. And many court cases.

Good. Every court case apparently makes Trump more popular.

[thaibeachlovers]

8 hours ago, Roo Island said:

What court cases is Biden facing?

A challenge isn't just a court case. The biggest one facing Biden IMO is convincing the voters he is fit enough for another 4 years.

[Jingthing]

4 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Good. Every court case apparently makes Trump more popular.

Good if you want the USA to fall to a fascist dictator.

[Tug]

7 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Good. Every court case apparently makes Trump more popular.

To a small minority of Americans even a large percentage of republicans are concerned and many flat out won’t vote for him.as far as the topic of the thread of course the intelligence community is concerned he’s a known usefull idiot(best case) quite possibly a straight up traitor 

Edited March 10 by Tug

[Hawaiian]

1 hour ago, Tug said:

To a small minority of Americans even a large percentage of republicans are concerned and many flat out won’t vote for him.as far as the topic of the thread of course the intelligence community is concerned he’s a known usefull idiot(best case) quite possibly a straight up traitor 

As if name calling is going to stop Donald Trump. 

"Small minority of Americans even a large percentage of republicans."  You sound very confused, like your main man.

[Skipalongcassidy]

16 hours ago, Roo Island said:

For sure, a long way to go. And many court cases.

And lots of new evidence... this just in... Jan 6 committee allegedly suppressed testimony showing Trump admin pushed for National Guard presence

[ozimoron]

5 minutes ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

And lots of new evidence... this just in... Jan 6 committee allegedly suppressed testimony showing Trump admin pushed for National Guard presence

 

Link to this BS please. Stop spreading disinformation or back it up.

[G_Money]

2 hours ago, ozimoron said:

 

Link to this BS please. Stop spreading disinformation or back it up.

Here you go!  We told you so.  Not disinformation, real information.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jan-6-committee-allegedly-suppressed-testimony-showing-trump-admin-pushed-national-guard-presence-report

Edited March 11 by G_Money

[G_Money]

4 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Good if you want the USA to fall to a fascist dictator.

 Perhaps if you tell everyone that 30 more times in 3 days we might believe you.

 

Please describe the facts that make him a facist according to a credible dictionary 

 

No Wiki.

[Walker88]

13 hours ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

These days here I honestly no longer know what is biting satire or batsh&t crazy. Or maybe the latter is the natural order of the world and after a period of rationality is reverting to type. Make Trump Great Again should be his real slogan. If he does win, what does that say about America as a great nation ?

Damn! The guy you quoted has embraced every last conspiracy known to man!  JFK, a Truther....can chemtrails be far behind?

 

I think it's a pretty good bet he's a QAnon type, also. Perhaps a Lunar-tic? ("Fake Moon Landing")

 

By the way, as a card-carrying member of the "Deep State", with shopping privileges at Titanic Duty Free (yes, THAT deep), can I pick you up a designer vodka or single malt?

 

[Chomper Higgot]

7 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

A challenge isn't just a court case. The biggest one facing Biden IMO is convincing the voters he is fit enough for another 4 years.

You obviously missed the SOTU.

[Chomper Higgot]

5 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

And lots of new evidence... this just in... Jan 6 committee allegedly suppressed testimony showing Trump admin pushed for National Guard presence

That’s not new evidence, it’s not even evidence.

 

It’s an unattributed claim.

 

[Hawaiian]

44 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

That’s not new evidence, it’s not even evidence.

 

It’s an unattributed claim.

 

I would say it is old evidence that has been resurrected because it's validity has been challenged.  Is it true text messages were scrubbed from SS agents' phones?  If so, were any rules or laws broken?

[candide]

4 hours ago, G_Money said:

Here you go!  We told you so.  Not disinformation, real information.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jan-6-committee-allegedly-suppressed-testimony-showing-trump-admin-pushed-national-guard-presence-report

Thank you for posting the article.

There's nothing new and it's already been known.

Since they have been caught by Dominion, Murdoch's media articles have a misleading title, but usually tell the truth somewhere in the article.

Have you read the article? It shows that:

- Trump discussed the use of the National Guard to protect the protest, not the Capitol,

- it was not a formal request,

- Pelosi was not involved. It confirms Trump and his gullible fans have been lying about it,

- the testimony content was integrated in the report (That's why we already knew about it). Thete were also testimonies by other people, such as Milley.

 

Here's an example of what was made public in 2021.

 

Trump wanted troops to protect his supporters at Jan. 6 rally

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/congresswoman-says-trump-administration-botched-capitol-riot-preparations-2021-05-12/

Edited March 11 by candide

[Chomper Higgot]

3 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

I would say it is old evidence that has been resurrected because its validity has been challenged.  Is it true text messages were scrubbed from SS agents' phones?  If so, were any rules or laws broken?

Is it even true?

 

 

[Hawaiian]

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Is it even true?

 

 

Why are you repeating my question if you don't have any evidence?

[Chomper Higgot]

46 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

Why are you repeating my question if you don't have any evidence?

Because the claims I am questioning are not backed by links to verify their veracity.

I don’t need to provide evidence, that’s for the person making the claims to do.

[LosLobo]

3 hours ago, candide said:

Since they have been caught by Dominion, Murdoch's media articles have a misleading title, but usually tell the truth somewhere in the article.

You seem to have a benevolent approach to Murdoch, MagaWorld's Chief of Media Propaganda.

Interesting he will be marrying soon into the family of one a Putin's oligarchs.

Media tycoon Rupert Murdoch gets engaged to Elena Zhukova - BBC News

Secret $40m deal links Abramovich to Putin's 'wallets’ - BBC News
 

[Chomper Higgot]

Here’s an interesting thing.

 

In response to Trump’s claim to presidential immunity, Jack Smith made a number of arguments including the observation that if immune a President could steal the nations most sensitive secrets and sell them.

 

Jack Smith is a very experience prosecutor with the legal education and training that entails.

 
Odd then that he should make that very specific case.

 

 

Edited March 11 by Chomper Higgot

[Hawaiian]

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Because the claims I am questioning are not backed by links to verify their veracity.

I don’t need to provide evidence, that’s for the person making the claims to do.

Try googling "Bernie Thompson letter 2022-12-30."  Look for "Dear Mr. Meyer" letter.

[Chomper Higgot]

38 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

Try googling "Bernie Thompson letter 2022-12-30."  Look for "Dear Mr. Meyer" letter.

Oh, the you make claims and others have to go searching on Google to prove them idiocy rises again.