Popular Post Social Media Posted March 4 Popular Post Share Posted March 4 US Supreme Court Upholds Trump's Eligibility for Presidential Ballot in Colorado In a landmark decision, the US Supreme Court has unanimously ruled against Colorado's attempt to bar former President Donald Trump from running for president in the state's Republican primary. The ruling, while specific to Colorado, sets a precedent that overrides similar challenges brought forth in other states, affirming Trump's eligibility to compete in the upcoming primary scheduled for Tuesday. Colorado's move to disqualify Trump stemmed from his alleged role in inciting the Capitol riot of 2021. However, the Supreme Court asserted that the power to disqualify candidates from federal offices, including the presidency, lies solely with Congress, not individual states. This decision clears the path for Trump to participate in the primary and solidifies his position as the front-runner for the Republican nomination. Trump hailed the ruling as a victory for America, emphasizing that candidates should not be removed from races based on the desires of their opponents. He viewed the decision as a step towards national unity, highlighting the need to respect democratic principles. However, Colorado's Secretary of State, Jena Griswold, expressed disappointment with the ruling, arguing that the state should have the authority to prevent individuals involved in insurrection from appearing on the ballot. Advocacy groups such as Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) also voiced discontent, characterizing Trump as an insurrectionist despite the court's decision. The Supreme Court's ruling centered on the interpretation of the 14th Amendment's Section 3, which prohibits individuals who have engaged in insurrection against the US from holding office. While acknowledging concerns about Trump's actions, the court concluded that only Congress possesses the authority to enforce this provision against federal officials and candidates. Notably, the decision received unanimous support from all nine justices, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett emphasizing the importance of settling politically charged issues during presidential election seasons. However, the court's liberal justices raised concerns about limiting alternative means of enforcement and urged broader considerations. Legal experts suggest that the ruling may have significant implications beyond Trump's candidacy, potentially affecting future electoral processes and constitutional interpretations. While addressing immediate concerns about Trump's eligibility, the decision also raises questions about the balance of power between states and the federal government. As Republican voters in Colorado and other states prepare to cast their ballots on Super Tuesday, Trump remains poised to secure victory and consolidate his position as the party's nominee. Despite the legal challenges and controversies surrounding his candidacy, Trump's return to the political arena appears imminent, setting the stage for a contentious election season. 05.03.24 Source 1 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Jingthing Posted March 4 Popular Post Share Posted March 4 What SCOTUS didn't address was the Colorado ruling that Citizen (not president) Trump is an insurrectionist. So as it stands now, Trump on top of being an adjudicated rapist is also an adjudicated insurrectionist. Of course his maga cult fans won't budge, even as it becomes clearer and clearer that Trump suffers from advanced dementia. 2 3 4 3 3 12 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JonnyF Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 Obviously the correct decision. The voters of America need to decide whether they want Trump or not, nobody else. Just like Brexit, attempts to overturn the Democratic will of the people should be shut down immediately. 5 2 2 3 1 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chomper Higgot Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 26 minutes ago, JonnyF said: Obviously the correct decision. The voters of America need to decide whether they want Trump or not, nobody else. Just like Brexit, attempts to overturn the Democratic will of the people should be shut down immediately. Trump’s insurrection of J6 is a far better example of an attempt to overthrow the democratic will of the people. I do agree a rigged SCOTUS is definitely not the place to decide. 2 2 3 1 1 5 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Skipalongcassidy Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 5 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: Trump’s insurrection of J6 is a far better example of an attempt to overthrow the democratic will of the people. I do agree a rigged SCOTUS is definitely not the place to decide. Stick with what you know... which is nothing... 9-0 is not rigged 4 4 5 2 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chomper Higgot Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 2 minutes ago, Skipalongcassidy said: Stick with what you know... which is nothing... 9-0 is not rigged Negates the fact that the SCOTUS has been rigged how? 2 2 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post thaibeachlovers Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 3 hours ago, Social Media said: the US Supreme Court has unanimously ruled against Colorado's attempt to bar former President Donald Trump from running for president Note the UNANIMOUSLY. I doubt they even wasted time discussing it. Had the SCOTUS let it stand, Biden would probably be banned from every GOP run state. It was always a stupid decision and shame on those involved that sought to void democracy to prevent a man that has not been convicted of the charges laid from running for POTUS. They must be terrified of Trump winning to try such an idiotic scheme. 1 1 1 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post thaibeachlovers Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 3 hours ago, Social Media said: Despite the legal challenges and controversies surrounding his candidacy, Trump's return to the political arena appears imminent, setting the stage for a contentious election season. Get the popcorn ready, it's going to be soooooo entertaining. 2 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JonnyF Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 8 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said: They must be terrified of Trump winning to try such an idiotic scheme. It reeks of pure desperation. They know the writing is on the wall. Expect more of these stupid attempts to subvert the democratic will of the people. 3 1 2 1 1 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Danderman123 Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 21 minutes ago, JonnyF said: It reeks of pure desperation. They know the writing is on the wall. Expect more of these stupid attempts to subvert the democratic will of the people. Some people just didn't like Trump, but the 14th amendment ploy was not a big thing. The plan is to beat Trump in November, that's the way to make him go away. 3 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tug Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said: Note the UNANIMOUSLY. I doubt they even wasted time discussing it. Had the SCOTUS let it stand, Biden would probably be banned from every GOP run state. It was always a stupid decision and shame on those involved that sought to void democracy to prevent a man that has not been convicted of the charges laid from running for POTUS. They must be terrified of Trump winning to try such an idiotic scheme. The reason they ruled so quickly is tomorrow is Super Tuesday 22 states hold primaries otherwise they most likely would have dragged it out like the imunity or should I say the impunity case that’s the big one 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post illisdean Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 (edited) 8 hours ago, Tug said: case that’s the big one Although immunity is controversial for some, the bigger case and one which will derail the loony left legal imbeciles lawfare Jan 6th KKK indictment hoax is Fisher v United States. Fisher v United States Further Reading-Newsweek Edited March 5 by stats trolling flame comment removed 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post candide Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 3 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said: Note the UNANIMOUSLY. I doubt they even wasted time discussing it. Had the SCOTUS let it stand, Biden would probably be banned from every GOP run state. It was always a stupid decision and shame on those involved that sought to void democracy to prevent a man that has not been convicted of the charges laid from running for POTUS. They must be terrified of Trump winning to try such an idiotic scheme. Stupid comment. Biden did not try to overturn a legit election! 😅 1 3 2 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post candide Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 3 hours ago, JonnyF said: Obviously the correct decision. The voters of America need to decide whether they want Trump or not, nobody else. Just like Brexit, attempts to overturn the Democratic will of the people should be shut down immediately. By curiosity: in your country, what would have happened to a PM whonwould not have accepted the results of elections and claimed he had won (despite officially losing), organise a protest and send a mob to assault the parliament, ask someone in charge of elections to find him 11,800 votes, plot to get alternative election results, etc....? 2 1 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Yellowtail Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 (edited) 6 hours ago, Jingthing said: What SCOTUS didn't address was the Colorado ruling that Citizen (not president) Trump is an insurrectionist. So as it stands now, Trump on top of being an adjudicated rapist is also an adjudicated insurrectionist. Of course his maga cult fans won't budge, even as it becomes clearer and clearer that Trump suffers from advanced dementia. So, in the US the left can call someone a rapist and an insurrectionist without ever being charged mush less convicted of either. Given Trump's advanced dementia, I think the left should be demanding Biden debate him weekly. This will show how sharp Biden is and how far-gone Trump is. What do you think? Edited March 5 by Yellowtail 3 3 1 1 4 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Jingthing Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: So, in the US the left can call someone a rapist and an insurrectionist without ever being charged mush less convicted of either. Given Trump's advanced dementia, I think the left should be demanding Biden debate him weekly. This will show how sharp Biden is and how far-gone Trump is. What do you think? It is a fact that Trump is an adjudicated rapist in a court of law. It is a fact that Trump is an adjudicated insurrectionist based on a legal process in Colorado. As far as presidential.debates let's see who the final nominees of both parties are first before blowing a lot of silly noise. If it's Trump v Biden I predict Trump will refuse to debate even once. We shall see. Edited March 5 by Jingthing 2 1 1 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Yellowtail Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 2 minutes ago, Jingthing said: It is a fact that Trump is an adjudicated rapist in a court of law. It is a fact that Trump has never been charged mush less convicted of rape. 2 minutes ago, Jingthing said: It is a fact that Trump is an adjudicated insurrectionist based on a legal process in Colorado. It is a fact that Trump has never been charged mush less convicted of Insurrection. 2 minutes ago, Jingthing said: As far as presidential.debates let's see who the final nominees of both parties are first before blowing a lot of silly noise. What's silly about it? I've said all along Biden would refuse to debate Trump. 2 minutes ago, Jingthing said: If it's Trump v Biden I predict Trump will refuse to debate even once. We shall see. Bet? I've got B1,000 that says Biden refuses to debate Trump. If one or the other or both do not get the nomination, no bet. 1 1 2 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Jingthing Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: It is a fact that Trump has never been charged mush less convicted of rape. It is a fact that Trump has never been charged mush less convicted of Insurrection. What's silly about it? I've said all along Biden would refuse to debate Trump. Bet? I've got B1,000 that says Biden refuses to debate Trump. If one or the other or both do not get the nomination, no bet. Waste of time replying to a post full of lies. 1 3 1 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post illisdean Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 11 minutes ago, Jingthing said: adjudicated rapist "Trump is an adjudicated rapist"....as in being a convicted rapist? You are dead wrong AGAIN, spreading false information via your false statements. But, ok, when did this adjudicated rape occur? Have any proof of this ridiculous claim to Trump is an adjudicated rapist"?? No...I didn't think so. Lies and more lies, thats all you can manage in your desperation. Jury verdict EJ Carroll 1 3 3 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Jingthing Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 (edited) 3 minutes ago, illisdean said: "Trump is an adjudicated rapist"....as in being a convicted rapist? You are dead wrong AGAIN, spreading false information via your false statements. But, ok, when did this adjudicated rape occur? Have any proof of this ridiculous claim to Trump is an adjudicated rapist"?? No...I didn't think so. Lies and more lies, thats all you can manage in your desperation. Jury verdict EJ Carroll The judge. https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-rape-e-jean-carroll-sexual-abuse-jury-judge-2023-7?op=1 Donald Trump raped E. Jean Carroll even though he was found liable only for 'sexual abuse,' judge rules Edited March 5 by Jingthing 1 1 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post illisdean Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 8 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: If it's Trump v Biden I predict Trump will refuse to debate even once. We shall see. Hopefully for Biden, there are no stairs leading to the debate stage or he'll get real lost real quick and Jill will need to hold his hand and guide him. LOL 1 2 1 1 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Yellowtail Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 1 minute ago, Jingthing said: The judge. https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-rape-e-jean-carroll-sexual-abuse-jury-judge-2023-7?op=1 Waste of time replying to a post full of lies. 1 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Yellowtail Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 3 minutes ago, illisdean said: "Trump is an adjudicated rapist"....as in being a convicted rapist? You are dead wrong AGAIN, spreading false information via your false statements. But, ok, when did this adjudicated rape occur? Have any proof of this ridiculous claim to Trump is an adjudicated rapist"?? No...I didn't think so. Lies and more lies, thats all you can manage in your desperation. Jury verdict EJ Carroll It's all they have. Truth is not a left-wing value. 1 1 2 1 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellowtail Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 1 minute ago, illisdean said: Hopefully for Biden, there are no stairs leading to the debate stage or he'll get real lost real quick and Jill will need to hold his hand and guide him. LOL She was an Education Major, so it's Dr. Jill! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post illisdean Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 (edited) 5 hours ago, Jingthing said: The judge. https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-rape-e-jean-carroll-sexual-abuse-jury-judge-2023-7?op=1 jury decides, not the judge. Judge can say whay he wants about his "interpretation" of the rape term and standard in NY law but it does not make it so, the Jury decides and it decided there was no evidence to prove rape, by a "preponderance of the evidence", a low standard compared to common criminal law requirement of "beyond a reasonable doubt". Do you understand the difference between civil and criminal evidentiary requirements? https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000188-027d-deac-a39a-4f7d06460000 Edited March 5 by stats flame comments removed 2 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post illisdean Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 22 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: It is a fact that Trump is an adjudicated insurrectionist based on a legal process in Colorado. LOL...what happened to Colorado legal process at SCOTUS yesterday to remove Trump from the ballot. The Democrat lawfare operatives’ seething anger at the 9-0 decision is truly comical. They are really angry at the 3 lib judges for refusing to debase themselves. Because these operatives’ legal arguments were so bad. Like true sociopaths, they have little ability to introspect and now these Colorado legal imbeciles look like the imbeciles they are. 1 1 2 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post connda Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 7 hours ago, Jingthing said: What SCOTUS didn't address was the Colorado ruling that Citizen (not president) Trump is an insurrectionist. So as it stands now, Trump on top of being an adjudicated rapist is also an adjudicated insurrectionist. Of course his maga cult fans won't budge, even as it becomes clearer and clearer that Trump suffers from advanced dementia. Today the progressives want to ban the conservative candidate that they viscerally hate. Tomorrow the useful idiots will become the target of their own derision, enmity, and lawfare. Lawfare is the end of actual democracy. But then again, the western concept of democracy is looking more and more like other -ism and -cracies such as kakistocracies and plutocracies with a bent toward totalitarianism, all framed as "democracies." When the SCOTUS affirmed for Big Money and Big Corporations via Citizens United vs FEC followed by Congress voting to allow the government to shower the American public with state propaganda on July 2nd 2013, democracy died. Now they are just filleting the carcass and hanging the commoners meat out to dry. 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 9 minutes ago, illisdean said: LOL...what happened to Colorado legal process at SCOTUS yesterday to remove Trump from the ballot. The Democrat lawfare operatives’ seething anger at the 9-0 decision is truly comical. They are really angry at the 3 lib judges for refusing to debase themselves. Because these operatives’ legal arguments were so bad. Like true sociopaths, they have little ability to introspect and now these Colorado legal imbeciles look like the imbeciles they are. The Colorado determination stands! SCOTUS didn’t mention it. What SCOTUS did was to void a part of the constitution ruling states can't enforce it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post frank83628 Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 (edited) 12 hours ago, Jingthing said: What SCOTUS didn't address was the Colorado ruling that Citizen (not president) Trump is an insurrectionist. So as it stands now, Trump on top of being an adjudicated rapist is also an adjudicated insurrectionist. Of course his maga cult fans won't budge, even as it becomes clearer and clearer that Trump suffers from advanced dementia. you can say somethings about Trumpo, but how you can possibly say he has dementia when he speaks for hours unhindered and without a teleprompter, lets compare them side by side, pretty sure will see who's got dementia, even cnn and a few changing their tune slightly..... https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=674235703386266 Edited March 5 by stats trolling reference removed 2 1 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Thingamabob Posted March 5 Popular Post Share Posted March 5 44 minutes ago, Jingthing said: Waste of time replying to a post full of lies. You have just replied. 1 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now