Jump to content

Trump's Vision for 2025: A Sweeping Crackdown on Immigration


Recommended Posts


7 minutes ago, Emdog said:

You simply are ignorant. Do some research outside of Breitbart. Illegals have taxes with held, social security, sales taxes, etc etc. Being illegals, they can't apply for refunds. Duh.

"Undocumented immigrants pay an estimated $11.6 billion a year in taxes.

Immigrants are also less likely to take public benefits than the native-born population for two reasons.

First, to receive most public benefits under the social safety net, immigrants must be lawful permanent residents for at least five years."

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/making-sense/4-myths-about-how-immigrants-affect-the-u-s-economy

 

Jane, you ignorant slut....  (Old time fans of SNL back when it was still funny will get the reference)  Here it is, straight from NYC:

 

New York City has taken urgent action, opening more than 200 emergency shelters for the more than 110,000 migrants who have arrived in the five boroughs seeking shelter. Today, with approximately 10,000 asylum seekers still arriving each month, the city estimates this mounting crisis will cost taxpayers $12 billion over three fiscal years — an amount that will continue to grow without federal and state intervention and support.

 

That's one city, with 110K illegals.  Multiply that by dozens of cities in 50 states and 10 million illegals and it dwarfs the taxes in your story.

 

https://www.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/650-23/amid-deepening-asylum-seeker-crisis-mayor-adams-new-steps-stabilize-city-s-budget-as#:~:text=“Our city continues to receive approximately 10%2C000 asylum,Fiscal Year 2025 if circumstances do not change.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Crossing the border to seek asylum is not illegal.

 

Even if that were true (and it's not), accommodating 110K of them is expected to cost NYC $12 billion over 3 years.  By Adams' own numbers. (linked above) 

 

Extrapolate that to dozens of sanctuary cities, border areas that are involuntarily inundated and other cities in all 50 states, and you're talking real money.  Which dwarfs the $11.6 billion that Emdog's link claims they pay in taxes.


Even Adams knows it's not sustainable.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Stop this fascist before it is too late.

Comprehensive Immigration reform yes.

Not this madness.

 

To add, if Americans think grocery priduce and restaurant meals are too expensive now

....

Unfortunately for a huge number of Americans, the lack of education is so extreme that they literally do not know anything about immigration policy. They know nothing about the quota system, they know nothing about how antiquated the system is, and they know nothing about the need for immigration reform. How do you fix illegal immigration before you fix legal immigration?

 

The US is no longer able to attract the best and the brightest due to an outdated quota system, and this is causing great harm to the nation. However slogans and jingoism seem to be all the rage right now, and it doesn't require an education to simply repeat a slogan. 

  • Sad 2
  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

President Joe Biden just recently referred to himself as the “first black woman to serve with a black president” and the first president that got “elected statewide in Delaware when I was a kid” in his latest baffling interview. Old sleepy Joe now thinks he is a black woman. You cannot make this stuff up folks and if you vote for Biden in the next election you are voting for "the first black woman."

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, thaipo7 said:

For what reason should the US be the ONLY country with open borders??  Why?  What do they bring to the  table other than an underclass that will become Democrat voters.  It seems the blacks and Hispanics are wising up to the Democrats BS of being there for them.  Why aren't the borders open for Cubans?  They have lived under a hard Tyranny and vote Republican, this is why.  This is the reason the border is closed to them.  You are what the Democrats want.  If you live in the US, you would or do vote Democrat.  Don't forget the terrorists that are in the US plus the thousands of Chinese.  They all new to be gotten rid of.  We help build border for other countries.  All of the Marxist Democrat elites have walls around their homes.

What open borders?

That's just rhetoric.

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He promised the same mass deportation plan in 2016 and didn’t deliver just like his plan to replace Affordable Carr Act, reduce cost of medicines, build the wall, raise tax for the rich etc. This another immigration red meat for his low information supporters who are stupid enough to believe Trump’s promises. 

 

 

 

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, thaipo7 said:

What do they bring to the  table other than an underclass that will become Democrat voters. 

 

Asked and answered.

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

This another immigration red meat for his low information supporters who are stupid enough to believe Trump’s promises. 

 

You mean the low information voters who claimed the laptop was real, Biden's kid was taking money from Ukraine, Joe is "the big guy", and the Hur report was actually being kind in its description of someone incompetent to stand trial?

 

Edited by impulse
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, simple1 said:

Stephen Miller,  is a known White Supremist.

Define White Supremacist and then show how he is one. Likewise Trump.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Crossing the border to seek asylum is not illegal.

Are people from countries not part of contiguous North/Central/South America, e.g Africa, China, Sweden, Norway crossing the border seeking asylum?

Edited by mokwit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just imagine what Thailand would be like without immigration laws. Sure there are many illegal workers but they do catch them and at least fine them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Asylum seekers are not ‘illegals’.

What about people with false stories and fake documents? Back in 2016(?) Austria turned away 2000 "Syrians" at the border in one day who had false Syrian documents.

 

Is lying about your refugee/asylum seeker/persecution to obtain a benefit (and "benefits") acceptable?

Edited by mokwit
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Crossing the border to seek asylum is not illegal.

 

Under international law, but some countries e.g. Australia have made it illegal under domestic law. Interestingly they have not made it official by resigning from the UN Convention of Refugees in order they can still claim to be "good guys"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, mokwit said:

Are people from countries not part of contiguous North/Central/South America, e.g Africa, China, Sweden, Norway crossing the border seeking asylum?

 

As examples read URLs below, though I'm sure you will deny and rant about left wing this and that...

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/nov/24/stephen-miller-white-nationalist-trump-immigration-guru

 

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/white-supremacy-returned-mainstream-politics/

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/18/us/politics/stephen-miller-white-nationalism.html

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/nov/14/stephen-miller-leaked-emails-white-nationalism-trump

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, simple1 said:

It's always links to biased sources.NYT and Guardian are biased [false] narrative platforms that you seem to think are unimpeachable (you thought the same of the discredited Southern Poverty Law Center). Do you really believe they are not?

 

Tell me what YOU think is a White Supremacist as you are bandying the term about. Also what is a White Nationalist?

Edited by mokwit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Hawaiian said:

Are you justifying unchecked immigration as a means of keeping food prices in check. Isn't that similar to Biden raiding the strategic oil reserve to keep gasoline prices  down?

Comprehensive immigration reform?  Why not first enforce the existing laws?

Thing is the existing laws are not addressing the new reality since those laws were passed. New immigration legislation is needed and both Republicans and Democrats hammered out a bipartisan bill to address this (after both parties have kicked the can down the roads for decades). OK, bipartisan attempt that the President had agreed to sign and … don’t do it says a Donald J Trump. Bill dead …

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Hawaiian said:

Are you justifying unchecked immigration as a means of keeping food prices in check. Isn't that similar to Biden raiding the strategic oil reserve to keep gasoline prices  down?

Comprehensive immigration reform?  Why not first enforce the existing laws?

Well some weeks ago, the US Congress had a bi-lateral border control bill - but once they tried to floor it, the Republicans backed off and it died there.  There is no way to do anything right now that might fix any problems in the US because neither side will join the other to get things moving forward.  Maybe if both Trump and Biden were to withdraw from the November elections, then possibly something positive would occur...oh yeah if they both dropped out that would be super positive for a start...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

 

They seem to think using slave labor as a justification to keep the price of cado toast down is normal. Back in the day it was the argument for cotton prices. 

See, a bit of critical thinking. Stating fact is not the same as promoting. Was also true with the cotton debate in their time. Focus on the issue … is there an agricultural labor shortage? If there is how to address the shortage. We’ve been here before. Might want to visit the history of the Eisenhower Administration and immigrant labor just as one snapshot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""