There is nothing wrong with short time, long time, or whatever time you want.

Just be fair and clarify what you want (at that time) so that there are no disappointments.

 

Let's say a guy is horny and he just wants to f or he wants a BJ or whatever. Should he go out to meet girls and buy them drinks and maybe dinner? Or should he use some app which purpose is to find a partner?

He can just go to a sexy girl bar, pick one, tell her what he wants, pay the bar, go out, do it, and have it done within an hour. Thanks, by, maybe see you next time. And maybe not.

 

Even if the guy is young and handsome and whatever, sometimes it's just nice to do it withing an hour of your desire without any foreplay. In Thailand that is easy. Just do it! 

 

Some posts with pictures and off topic along with mentioning posters directly have been removed.

Comment on topic. 

Please settle down and stop attacking each other. 

Hey @bob smith you've never gone short-time have you? 

5 hours ago, SoCal1990 said:

First off, why is it anyone's right or business to say something condescending about another person's lifestyle, especially someone else whom they personally know nothing about? 

Then why start a topic about it? It is none of your business either

25 minutes ago, maesariang said:

Then why start a topic about it? It is none of your business either

Hey Susan, why is everything you write always so dreary? You aren't happy. 

37 minutes ago, RSD1 said:

Hey Susan, why is everything you write always so dreary? You aren't happy. 

 

Now there is irony 😊 Look into the mirror and repeat.

2 hours ago, RSD1 said:

Over 30 replies. Barely any on topic. 🙄
 

Short-time is brilliant! So is whoever invented it. 

 

That includes most of your posts.

Others actually read the OP's post and replied to it. Whereas people like yourself just appear to read the topic title and prematurely creamed your pants.

Suzy is back and with a twin?

4 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

The retired brigadier in my condo had a large number of women companions. He was a dashing, fit and impeccably turned out.

 

Good for him.

 

I bet he wasn't getting an exhilarating yet also cleansing experience on a lilo within 5 minutes of meeting them though. 

 

Horses for courses. Sometimes you have time for a 3 course meal in a fine restaurant and sometimes you just want to grab a cheeky McDonalds on the way back from the pub. Just because you enjoy one, doesn't mean you can't enjoy the other. 

1 hour ago, RSD1 said:

Hey Susan, why is everything you write always so dreary? You aren't happy. 

is that the reincarnation of susan? thanks, i missed that

7 hours ago, SoCal1990 said:

Whenever I see a post from somebody (here on AN) talking about going short-time, or taking part in the nightlife in Thailand there will inevitably be some other posters on here who will then comment something to the effect of "sad" or "shallow", but I never understood why. So let's unpack this. 

 

First off, why is it anyone's right or business to say something condescending about another person's lifestyle, especially someone else whom they personally know nothing about? 

 

Next, what is actually sad or shallow about it? Some men simply may not want to share their life with a partner full-time, but they also don't want to be forced to be celibate. So short-time works really well for them. Nothing wrong with that.

 

Then are there any real moral issues? No. Are they helping to put some much needed money into the lower end of the local economy? Yes. 
 

So somebody explain to me how it's sad or shallow. And furthermore, explain to me how it isn't the perfect thing for someone who still has biological needs and/or carnal desires, but feels happier being alone. 

 

I suspect many of the posters making these condescending comments are ones who are in longtime monogamous relationships, and who can't envision or understand how someone else could possibly live a happy life in any other way. 
 

But truth be told, the guy living the short-time lifestyle might be a lot happier than the guy judging him and who feels stuck in a married position. And perhaps it's the guy who is not living the short-time lifestyle who is actually the one who's feeling sad. 
 

 

Yea..  that was me who made a comment.

 

Basically you are a saddo for paying to be touched. But this is not why I made that comment. My comment was because he mentioned being stoned while going short time. Why do you need to be stoned out of your mind to nutz? Yea... maybe because the girl is ugly or because you don't want to deal with consequences of your actions banging a prostitute who was creamed by thousand Indians before you.

 

that makes you a triple saddo.

 

BTW, some of you safdos don't seem to get it. If you are in a relationship and the woman really loves you, she will do anything for you. That is millions of times more exciting than you paying a prostitute. Use your imagination.

 

And yes....  it is my business if you post it on a forum for everyone to see.

7 hours ago, SoCal1990 said:

here who will then comment something to the effect of "sad" or "shallow",

I had remarked that it's "shallow" in another thread.

 

It's ok for a while maybe, but not indefinitely.

 

Unless maybe you can get a pet and at the very least bond with an animal and take care of a pet.

 

You gotta bond and take care of something, if not a woman. 

 

Sex is just greedily getting needs met. You're not expressing love, which human beings are designed for. 

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

I only do short time because I like a bed to myself and ache too much in the morning to see how low I sunk the night before. So I pay them to leave after 15 minutes or so.

 

Don't you have room for two beds in your place?

 

 

16 minutes ago, Celsius said:

 

Yea..  that was me who made a comment.

 

Basically you are a saddo for paying to be touched. But this is not why I made that comment. My comment was because he mentioned being stoned while going short time. Why do you need to be stoned out of your mind to nutz? Yea... maybe because the girl is ugly or because you don't want to deal with consequences of your actions banging a prostitute who was creamed by thousand Indians before you.

 

that makes you a triple saddo.

 

BTW, some of you safdos don't seem to get it. If you are in a relationship and the woman really loves you, she will do anything for you. That is millions of times more exciting than you paying a prostitute. Use your imagination.

 

And yes....  it is my business if you post it on a forum for everyone to see.

 

Some of the are just one step away from being rapists. At least it keeps them off the streets.

Perhaps because of the issue of consent.

The prostitutes are only consenting to let us use their bodies because we are paying them. 

And by sheer luck we were born from countries with higher wealth, in the UK because our ancestors went around colonizing and exploiting other countries resources, in the USA because they used kidnapped black slaves to do all the work for free.

 

So the result is we can defile these beautiful young girls, from poor and often dysfunctional homes with our sickest sexual perversions for the price of a meal.

 

It sure is good being us. But people with empathy will be upset by this situation. It is to be expected. 

36 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Good for him.

 

I bet he wasn't getting an exhilarating yet also cleansing experience on a lilo within 5 minutes of meeting them though. 

 

Horses for courses. Sometimes you have time for a 3 course meal in a fine restaurant and sometimes you just want to grab a cheeky McDonalds on the way back from the pub. Just because you enjoy one, doesn't mean you can't enjoy the other. 

 

I disagree. Most of them have no access to the other, nor the capability. It's junk food or nothing.

33 minutes ago, Celsius said:

Why do you need to be stoned out of your mind to nutz?

Many things are more enjoyable when stoned like eating and having sex. 
More pleasure.

3 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

And by sheer luck we were born from countries with higher wealth, in the UK because our ancestors went around colonizing and exploiting other countries resources, in the USA because they used kidnapped black slaves to do all the work for free.

 

 

You do realize that most P4P in Thailand is between Thais?

 

White guilt is a terrible affliction. 

3 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

Perhaps because of the issue of consent.

The prostitutes are only consenting to let us use their bodies because we are paying them. 
 

That's pretty much the definition of consent in every country of the world.

Some hold out for a house, some will give it up for dinner and a few drinks.

If you have nothing they want, there will be no consent!

I think I speak for quite a few when I say we enjoy ourselves with the variety of females available in Thailand, then settle down with one we think is special. Men are naturally polygamous, until they no longer are capable.

 

As for the wowsers, who cares what they think. I don't.

 

I am always amused when I go back to Australia. The men are envious, the women are seething.

7 hours ago, SoCal1990 said:

Then are there any real moral issues? No. Are they helping to put some much needed money into the lower end of the local economy? 
 

Your intentions are not helping people into the lower end of the local economy, you want to have sex with a prostitute to satisfy your needs. Nothing wrong with that though.

 

Comparing with people who have a relationship is useless as this is something completely different.

4 minutes ago, NowNow said:

 

I disagree. Most of them have no access to the other, nor the capability. It's junk food or nothing.

 

I'd say that's nonsense. Especially in Thailand. In my experience the only foreign males I've met in Thailand that didn't have a gf or a wife were gay. 

 

Some people just don't want steak mignon for every meal. Up to them. 

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

You do realize that most P4P in Thailand is between Thais?

 

White guilt is a terrible affliction. 

Yes, by the richer Thais.

And a large proportion of the girls are Laotian, Cambodian or Burmese. The Thai men are using their advantage the same way we do. 
 

But I think the OP was referring to us white people exploiting the locals in this thread so that is what I was discussing.

 

Nice bit of whataboutism though. good one.

5 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

Whenever I see a post from somebody (here on AN) talking about going short-time.

 

Why not just use the correct term of prostitute? 

 

Shallow is used, because the people who must rely on the sex trade typically have unpleasant unattractive personalities   

Well, that is me and all my colleagues in the Merchant Navy 1977-2015.

Shallow and unattractive that is my bubble burst. 555 555 555

 

Going away for 6-7months+ just leaving the dock we would be dazzled by bright lights, bright, very bright 'red' lights, my claim to fame or guilt were my first $100.00 lady from a bar in Yokohama, 1980 I were aged 25 at that time getting $2.40 to the pound so not that expensive then, have been in bars/brothels and woke up in places that gentle folk would not shine a torch, Tema in Ghana for one.

 

2004 Stena offered a position offshore Matak Island, Indonesia, night before joining short times in Jakarta in night clubs behind bus-station, leave spent in Thailand as a tax exile doing the UK 90 day tax rule so 2004 - 2015 Phuket then Pattaya were my playground of debauchery.

 

If the lady consents and is willing why not.  I never called them prozzies, they were on the 'game' and I enjoyed paying to partake and see the game being played out,  even ladies down the docks whispering from alleyways were in the "Hire or lease" business.  Being able to enjoy the physical delights of an attractive, slim, sweet smelling woman is not shallow, it is normal desire and dived in when on leave.

 

Now retired up country these past 9 years, Covid stopped my 3 monthly visits to meet old friends, some who returned to Europe and Oz, some others sadly went up the chimney. 

 

Will agree if you smile and are pleasant well-mannered the chances of getting a more energetic response increases.

 

Pon song satang

 

 

 

3 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

Yes, by the richer Thais.

And a large proportion of the girls are Laotian, Cambodian or Burmese. The Thai men are using their advantage the same way we do. 
 

But I think the OP was referring to us white people exploiting the locals in this thread so that is what I was discussing.

 

Nice bit of whataboutism though. good one.

 

Nothing to do with race. Or wealth. Plenty of Thai guys where I work on relatively low salaries who partake. 

 

Men like women and if they can get some without spending weeks wining and dining someone then many will take that option. 

 

Nothing to do with being desperate either. You think Hugh Grant was desperate? Charlie Sheen? Tiger Woods? Plenty of good looking, charismatic celebrities partake. 

 

It's just easy. Like grabbing a McDonalds when you can't be bothered to book a table at a fancy restaurant. 

 

 

12 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

That's pretty much the definition of consent in every country of the world.

Some hold out for a house, some will give it up for dinner and a few drinks.

If you have nothing they want, there will be no consent!

 

What you write is totally superficial and possibly explains the state of your relationships.

17 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

I'd say that's nonsense. Especially in Thailand. In my experience the only foreign males I've met in Thailand that didn't have a gf or a wife were gay. 

 

Some people just don't want steak mignon for every meal. Up to them. 

 

It's you who is writing nonsense. What has your statement to do with anything? I have a girlfriend, but a real one 😊 The kind that Celsius describes. Who will do anything for you, without financial incentive.

 

I actually see these specimens every day and read their pathetic writings on forums. They don't have a choice because they are mostly incapable of doing it any other way. 

12 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Nothing to do with race. Or wealth. Plenty of Thai guys where I work on relatively low salaries who partake. 

 

Men like women and if they can get some without spending weeks wining and dining someone then many will take that option. 

 

Nothing to do with being desperate either. You think Hugh Grant was desperate? Charlie Sheen? Tiger Woods? Plenty of good looking, charismatic celebrities partake. 

 

It's just easy. Like grabbing a McDonalds when you can't be bothered to book a table at a fancy restaurant. 

 

 

 

There's a difference in someone being curious to try something and making it a way of life.

Funny that you mention Charlie Sheen as if he is some kind of role model. He's as messed up as they come. Charismatic.....😂

3 minutes ago, NowNow said:

I actually see these specimens every day and read their pathetic writings on forums. They don't have a choice because they are mostly incapable of doing it any other way. 

Very true.

as an overweight, shabbily dressed male in my 50s hot girls in the UK will not do me for free and the prostitutes who are young and fit are too expensive and make you wear condoms.

 

Here in SEA I can have very young women who often look even younger than they are for prices that are so cheap they are almost free and if you work out the hourly rate for a long time it is cheaper than drinking beer per hour.

 

Plus you can get them to do the things to them that most girls in the west will mostly refuse, anal, threesomes, facials, bareback etc etc 

 

And they have nice hair and beautiful skin.