Jump to content

Rudy Giuliani Ordered to Surrender within 7 days $6 Million Manhattan Apartment


Social Media

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

No.

 

It’s a civil ruling.

 

But your interest in Trump interfering in justice is noted.

 

   I have heard on good authority that Trump will become a fascist dictator when he gets elected , would Trump fascist dictator be able to over turn the rules .

   (Thingymajing told me about Don becoming a Fascist Dictator when he wins)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Social Media said:

Furthermore, the ruling also makes Freeman and Moss beneficiaries of $2 million that Giuliani claims is still owed to him by Donald Trump's 2020 presidential campaign.

There's at least a consolation for Giuliani! The election workers will never get them! 🤣

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, neeray said:

Rudy must be so regretting that he made such a foolish decision and rode the wrong horse. 

I doubt it.  He's too invested in the cult and still grifting them.  If he were to let that go he's got nothing.

Edited by shdmn
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He can always share a small apartment with the pillow guy they could keep themselves occupied with conspiracy theories night after night just wait I will prove it .....tomorrow 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/23/2024 at 12:44 AM, HappyExpat57 said:

Sum num na! This idiot should have quit while he was on top of his game.

 

I can't think of a single person who hasn't been ruined in one form or another, from reputation through impoverishment or even imprisonment, by their association with Trump.

 

I also can't think of a single person who made good because of that association.

 

Except perhaps the Capitol Shaman who at least got 15 minutes of fame (before he was jailed).

Edited by BusyB
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/23/2024 at 5:46 AM, Tug said:

Good 👍 a person just can’t make stuff up at others expense and determent exposing them to danger/threats/harm.are you listening Donald?we really do need to figure out a better way to handle the willful expression of known disinformation and lies in the guise of free speech.it need.s to stop.

 

True, in some countries telling obvious lies which encourage others to make inappropriate decisions would be chargeable and incur sizeable punishments. 

Edited by scorecard
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/24/2024 at 12:47 AM, BritManToo said:

Another political court ruling with a nonsense fine.

How can you defame 2 nobodies $140M?

 

Sometimes wonder if these stories are fake - a way to get normal people to self-censor their speech.

 

Also the story of the man in the UK who was allegedly sent to prison for putting up stickers the questioning NON stop gimmiegration.

 

Are these dtories even true?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/23/2024 at 5:46 AM, Tug said:

Good 👍 a person just can’t make stuff up at others expense and determent exposing them to danger/threats/harm.are you listening Donald?we really do need to figure out a better way to handle the willful expression of known disinformation and lies in the guise of free speech.it needs to stop.

Defamation laws are to replace lost income from people telling lies.

 

2 nobodies counting votes as a second job aren't likely to be large earners, so even if you defamed them in a way that stopped them ever working again ..... Maybe $1M each. But they'd need to prove they lost that potential amount.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...