Jump to content

Trump the convicted felon gets off so why not Bidens son?


Recommended Posts

Posted
26 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

my interest in educating Trumpers is waning quickly

Our interest in your pompous trying, and failing because there is no educating that needs to be done, waned a long time ago.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Did you read that quote that refers to "an accusatory instrument other than a felony"?

Did you purposefully drop the word "complaint" from your quote?

It's essential to include it because the reference is not to a 'felony' but to a 'felony complaint' which is a simplified document that charges a person with a felony crime.  As you will see in a longer and earlier post by me, a more complete and accurate explanation about 'felony complaint' is given.... 

 

You need to make sure you don't make errors like your truncated quote to be taken seriously.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Our interest in your pompous trying, and failing because there is no educating that needs to be done, waned a long time ago.

Are you a relative of Trump's.... you have the same characteristic of never admitting an error that he exhibits.

Posted
Quote

Trump the convicted felon gets off so why not Bidens son?

 

I think you got it the wrong way round.

 

The looney-left has been going on about Trump being "a convicted felon", of course he can now point out the hypocrisy.

 

Even you yourself choose to label Trump as "the convicted felon".  🤦‍♂️

  • Love It 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BangkokReady said:

 

I think you got it the wrong way round.

 

The looney-left has been going on about Trump being "a convicted felon", of course he can now point out the hypocrisy.

 

Even you yourself choose to label Trump as "the convicted felon".  🤦‍♂️

Hunter Biden was not put forth to run for president so a felony conviction for him is not much of a stain on the reputation of the US government.

 

It was the jury in the NY felony case that established Trump is a convicted felon with a unanimous verdict on all 34 counts.  After sentencing, Trump will be able to submit an appeal.  

  • Confused 1
Posted

I guess the only part of Biden pardoning his son that concerns me is it is precedent for an outgoing POTUS pardoning a family member involved in influence peddling and accepting money from foreign countries.  Some of whom are truly not friends of the USA.  By doing this he closes the door on legitimate investigation into how the Biden family accumulated money during his political career.

 

Feels like he is covering his own ass as well as Hunter.  Whatever.  Corruption is rampant and I as a lowly citizen have no power to change anything. 

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, jimmybcool said:

I guess the only part of Biden pardoning his son that concerns me is it is precedent for an outgoing POTUS pardoning a family member involved in influence peddling and accepting money from foreign countries.  Some of whom are truly not friends of the USA.  By doing this he closes the door on legitimate investigation into how the Biden family accumulated money during his political career.

 

Feels like he is covering his own ass as well as Hunter.  Whatever.  Corruption is rampant and I as a lowly citizen have no power to change anything. 

 

Others did have the power to enact change. They voted for Trump. And boy are those that perceive benefit from the corrupt status quo howling about it.

Posted
On 12/2/2024 at 7:40 PM, BigStar said:

 

It's a simple example of the Complex Question fallacy. I.e., nonsensical. Trump isn't a convicted felon or even convicted of anything, as a judgement of guilt hasn't been entered. The judge can, and may, dismiss the entire case. You don't dismiss a conviction; you overturn it. And if Trump were convicted, he'd immediately appeal. He can't. NY evidently will call a mere verdict a "conviction," but it's rather nonsensical. Note that our leftists don't accept NY law when it comes to the supposed assault and insist that it's "rape."

 

Hunter is now immune from prosecution for any and all crimes from the last 10 years! What corruption.

Typical BS about Trumps NY case made up by someone unwilling to invest any time/effort to uncover the details of the situation.  You'd rather just accept crazy assumptions by other Trumpers who hope will convince the suckers.  Here's the options open to the justice system to deal with Trump's convictions:

 

https://apnews.com/article/trump-hush-money-conviction-what-happens-3cd52218c39ebc70a8514688ce33fcef

 

 

Posted
14 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

I provide truth and clarity to debunk one of the fabrications used by Trump supporters to attempt to wash away his stench.

 

14 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

You should take up comedy. Sure to be successful as a comedian given that post.

Since my original comment was in regard to the correct categorization of Trump as a convicted felon, do you have any evidence that Trump has not been convicted?  When we all see your dead silence on the issue you'll clearly be shown to be the clown.  If you do choose to respond it will then be evident your comprehension of the relevant facts is severely lacking.

Posted
3 hours ago, BigStar said:

 

Relevant, as it addresses the credibility of your whataboutism that you pretend you don't believe in: the meaningless repetition of hearsay, rumor, and usual leftist attacks that you've sucked up and repeated here as if it's relevant to the fact that Trump graduated from Wharton.

 

It doesn't matter what you consider; whatever it is, is likely to be wrong anyway.

I’m bored now, so leave you with Mark  Twains quote. “ never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience”.

Posted
On 12/2/2024 at 7:40 PM, BigStar said:

 

It's a simple example of the Complex Question fallacy. I.e., nonsensical. Trump isn't a convicted felon or even convicted of anything, as a judgement of guilt hasn't been entered. The judge can, and may, dismiss the entire case. You don't dismiss a conviction; you overturn it. And if Trump were convicted, he'd immediately appeal. He can't. NY evidently will call a mere verdict a "conviction," but it's rather nonsensical. Note that our leftists don't accept NY law when it comes to the supposed assault and insist that it's "rape."

 

Hunter is now immune from prosecution for any and all crimes from the last 10 years! What corruption.

Trump and his family are vastly more corrupt than anyone else in government.

They all personally benefited from his time in the WH and they'll do the same again.

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
13 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

What does the pacifist Trump who had multiple Vietnam war deferments for bonespurs, and lifeguard Biden who had multiple deferments for his asthma(seriously!) got to do with this sudden revelation to the left that the Bidens WERE selling out America to enemy states for cash?

Seems both off topic and desperate.

Just a reminder........😉

Posted
5 hours ago, Andycoops said:

Trump and his family are vastly more corrupt than anyone else in government.

 

Good timing, as, after lying like a dog, Biden pardoned, and even pre-pardoned for the past decade, Hunter for any and all crimes--by executive order, not going through the pardons office--to cover up the extended crimes of the Biden crime family. More such are expected. Hunter may have blackmailed him with threats of exposure about that 10% for "the big guy," among other things.

 

But it appears that Hunter can't invoke the 5th when called before a congressional committee next year. Hee.

 

As Biden cited the corruption of his own DOJ, Trump's lawyers have immediately filed for dismissal of his hush money case partly owing to corrupt prosecution as well:

 

President Biden asserted that his son was 'selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted,' and 'treated differently,'" Trump's legal team wrote. The Manhattan district attorney, they claimed, had engaged in the type of political theater "that President Biden condemned."

 

https://www.fox4beaumont.com/news/nation-world/donald-trumps-attorneys-wants-hush-money-conviction-tossed-citing-president-joe-bidens-recent-pardon-hunter

 

Which will be ignored.

 

image.png.472839f94164f04b7832f652c4dc2ee2.png

Posted
13 hours ago, georgegeorgia said:

Thankyou for clarifying that Bigstar 

I thought he attended the Alice Springs  school 

 

No, did you go there? Secondary ed was at the New York Military Academy, another respected school for the elites.

 

image.png.b9f569815f9c52140965229e2cdbdfe3.png

 

So you can sweat over that. Our liberal proctologists can dig up the usual rumors, lies, hearsay, leftist slurs about that as well. All irrelevant. He won; he's in.

 

Reminds me of idiot Dems trawling through Kavanaugh's high school yearbook

 

Posted
On 12/2/2024 at 7:47 PM, BigStar said:

 

Why not? He already has. Trump graduated from Wharton, top school. Obviously, you're just projecting.

 

Why would trump stop the Uni from releasing his record whilst at Wharton?

 

It’s rare for a professor to disparage the intelligence of a student, but according to attorney Frank DiPrima, who was close friends with professor William T. Kelley for 47 years, the prof made an exception for Donald Trump, at least in private. “He must have told me that 100 times over the course of 30 years,” says DiPrima, who has been practicing law since 1963 and has served as in-house counsel for entities including the Federal Trade Commission and Playboy Enterprises. “I remember the inflection of his voice when he said it: ‘Donald Trump was the dumbest goddamn student I ever had!’” 

 

https://www.phillymag.com/news/2019/09/14/donald-trump-at-wharton-university-of-pennsylvania/

  • Sad 1
Posted
On 12/3/2024 at 8:23 PM, gamb00ler said:

The felony charges in NY state vs Trump were from a grand jury indictment... not a felony complaint.

 

In New York, felonies typically require a grand jury indictment to move forward with formal charges.

The prosecutor presents evidence to a grand jury, a panel of citizens, and the grand jury decides whether there is enough evidence to formally charge the person with a felony. If the grand jury finds sufficient evidence, it issues an indictment.

The defendant does not have a right to be present at the grand jury proceedings, but they may have a lawyer assist them in preparing for the process.

Alternatively, in some cases, the defendant may waive the grand jury process, and the case can proceed via a felony complaint.

 

Do not pass GO, and do not collect $200.

 

Please up your games.... my interest in educating Trumpers is waning quickly

Ok. I think you are getting confused between the terms 'verdict' and 'conviction'. 

 

Perhaps this will make it easier. If a jury passes a verdict of not guilty, you don't just walk out of court. The court has to formally acquit you. It is part of the procedure. Similarly, a jury can find you guilty. But it is the court that convicts. It is a formal.procedure. My understanding is that this part of the procedure has not happened in this case. Once the conviction is entered, a date for sentencing must be immediately confirmed. A court cannot unreasonably delay sentencing. 

Posted
2 hours ago, japanese said:

Ok. I think you are getting confused between the terms 'verdict' and 'conviction'. 

 

Perhaps this will make it easier. If a jury passes a verdict of not guilty, you don't just walk out of court. The court has to formally acquit you. It is part of the procedure. Similarly, a jury can find you guilty. But it is the court that convicts. It is a formal.procedure. My understanding is that this part of the procedure has not happened in this case. Once the conviction is entered, a date for sentencing must be immediately confirmed. A court cannot unreasonably delay sentencing. 

Your understanding is wrong.  You've made many assumptions that are not true.  The jury convicts and the judge sentences.  The judge cannot sentence a defendant who has not been convicted by a plea of guilty or a guilty verdict.

Posted
On 12/2/2024 at 7:04 AM, advancebooking said:

Its a simple statement/ question. Trump should not make any comments about this in the media. Keep quiet you uneducated man. 

What was Trump convicted of? 

Posted
1 hour ago, TedG said:

What was Trump convicted of? 

Falsifying business records in the furtherance of election interference which upgraded the charges that are normally misdemeanors to felonies.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...