Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 minutes ago, mania said:

She has abstained from interference in the concerns of others, even when conflict has been for principles to which she clings,
as to the last vital drop that visits the heart.


But she goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy.

Yeah, then explain how and why we entered WWI -- with the loss of 100,000 troops. Would have been better if we had minded our own business; then, in all probability, the war would have ended in a near draw. Meaning, no WWII. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, transam said:

How many wars, terrorist organisations worldwide has Iran funded.............?  🤐

Can you actually give an answer to your own question?

Same question of the USA... they funded Isis and al queda and various 'rebel groups' for decades, the latest being the overthrow of Assad in Syria by Al -queda, with funding and assistance of Israel, US & UK, who have now coincidenently removed the group from the terrorism list. 

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 4
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, transam said:

Does your hero Putin have approval to bomb Ukraine civilians daily..............?   🤔

 

Isn't it strange you NEVER put down Putin and his civilian blitzkrieg, eh...........🤥

Yes Putin has the approval.

 

Not strange at all, i have said the war wants to stop, i dont agree with anyone dying. Tell that to your chum Zelensky.

 

For once Try writing a comment about the actual thread topic, you own thoughts and opinions, instead of infantile one line nonsense.

  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Down 4
Posted
1 hour ago, jacey said:

it amaze me how people think war is funny

Yes, the pensioners here that are far far away from any hostilities, all banging the war drums from the safely of their keyboards

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 5
Posted
22 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

A better question would be how many terrorist actions has Iran carried out and funded? This is not a country that should have nukes.

I havent heard of Iran killing people that are collecting aid. How many press have been shot by IDF, there would be outrage if it was any other country, but they get a pass, investigate themselves, and find no wrongndoing

Screenshot_20250618_124033_Facebook.jpg

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, Moonlover said:

US officials have confirmed to the BBC's partner CBS News that MOPs were used in the strikes, with two for each target struck'.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg9r4q99g4o

From CBS News:

 

Experts have believed the best chance at destroying the facility lies with the U.S.-produced "bunker-buster" bomb known as the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP — a bomb so heavy that it could only be dropped by an American B-2 bomber. 

 

A source familiar with the operation and a senior Defense Department official confirmed that the MOP was used in the strikes, with two MOPs used per target. However, a senior Defense Department official later told CBS News that three B-2s were used to strike Fordo, with each of those B-2s armed with 2 MOPs.

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/u-s-launches-strikes-iranian-nuclear-facilities-trump-says/

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 minute ago, jerrymahoney said:

From CBS News:

 

Experts have believed the best chance at destroying the facility lies with the U.S.-produced "bunker-buster" bomb known as the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP — a bomb so heavy that it could only be dropped by an American B-2 bomber. 

 

A source familiar with the operation and a senior Defense Department official confirmed that the MOP was used in the strikes, with two MOPs used per target. However, a senior Defense Department official later told CBS News that three B-2s were used to strike Fordo, with each of those B-2s armed with 2 MOPs.

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/u-s-launches-strikes-iranian-nuclear-facilities-trump-says/

I'm now hearing 12 MOP's were used for Fordow.

Posted
4 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

I'm now hearing 12 MOP's were used for Fordow.

NYTimes:

 

Strike details: A U.S. official said that six B-2 bombers dropped a dozen 30,000-pound bunker buster bombs on the Fordo nuclear site, which lies deep underground, and Navy submarines fired 30 TLAM cruise missiles at the Natanz and Isfahan sites. One B-2 also dropped two bunker busters on Natanz, according to the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss military operations.

 

Still on the QT and hush-hush.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, JimGant said:

Yeah, then explain how and why we entered WWI -- with the loss of 100,000 troops. Would have been better if we had minded our own business; then, in all probability, the war would have ended in a near draw. Meaning, no WWII. 

It is easy to make decisions looking back. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Denying the most dangerous regime on earth the capability of making the most dangerous weapon on earth isn't how I would define war mongering.

 From same JQ Adams Speech

Quote

The fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force....
She might become the dictatress of the world. She would be no longer the ruler of her own spirit....

 

Lastly this claim of most dangerous has been propagated for 30 years yet who drops the bombs?

 

In fact who is the only country to have ever used an Atomic bomb on a civilian population?

 

So now answer again who is the most dangerous?

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, dinsdale said:

I'm now hearing 12 MOP's were used for Fordow.

12 could be the entire inverntory of GBU 57's?  It's not like the USAF has a warehouse full of 30,000 bombs. Could be difficult to execute a follow on strike on Fordow.  I wonder when the bombing footage will be released.  Each GBU 57 has about 5,000 lbs of explosives and the ground probably was shaking after each impact and detonation.  

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
21 minutes ago, JimGant said:

Yeah, then explain how and why we entered WWI -- with the loss of 100,000 troops. Would have been better if we had minded our own business; then, in all probability, the war would have ended in a near draw. Meaning, no WWII. 

He (JQA) was Secretary of State

 

Not president not god...That what he said in that speech was great common sense did not make it a law that the usual suspects followed.

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, mania said:

 From same JQ Adams Speech

 

Lastly this claim of most dangerous has been propagated for 30 years yet who drops the bombs?

 

In fact who is the only country to have ever used an Atomic bomb on a civilian population?

 

So now answer again who is the most dangerous?

Nice to rewrite history, but both Hiroshima and Nagasaki were military targets. 

 

Of course, you're rather another 100,000 American boys would have been killed invading. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, mania said:

 From same JQ Adams Speech

 

Lastly this claim of most dangerous has been propagated for 30 years yet who drops the bombs?

 

In fact who is the only country to have ever used an Atomic bomb on a civilian population?

 

So now answer again who is the most dangerous?

Yeh right. The Iranian regime are the good guys. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

Good to see Trump and Netanyahu teaming up to weaken the evil Iranian regime.

 

Also amusing to see the "progressives" siding with the prehistoric tyrannical Iranian regime as I predicted they would. 😄

It's an easy formula. Progressives hate Jews and America, Iran hates Jews and America, therefore Iran is good

  • Agree 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, sqwakvfr said:

12 could be the entire inverntory of GBU 57's?  It's not like the USAF has a warehouse full of 30,000 bombs.

Makes sense.

Posted
2 hours ago, shdmn said:

Gaslight
Obstruct
Project

 

 

remember-when-he-talked-about-obama-needing-congressional-v0-6gjwk1tlqd8f1.webp

 

42 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Did Obama have approval for vapourising 40 people at a wedding?

See trump's statement on congressional approval.

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Yeh right. The Iranian regime are the good guys. 

No never said so & our unprovoked attacking them does not make us the good guys either

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...