Jump to content

Trump lawyer says he paid porn star $130,000 with his own money


webfact

Recommended Posts

Trump lawyer says he paid porn star $130,000 with his own money

 

2018-02-14T231437Z_1_LYNXNPEE1D267_RTROPTP_4_USA-TRUMP-TRADE.JPG

FILE PHOTO - U.S. President Donald Trump holds a meeting on trade with members of Congress at the White House in Washington, U.S., February 13, 2018. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A private lawyer for President Donald Trump says he paid $130,000 (£92,825) of his own money to adult film star Stormy Daniels who once claimed she had an affair with Trump more than a decade ago.

 

The payment to Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, was made during the 2016 presidential election campaign but the lawyer, Michael Cohen, said he was working alone and that it was not a campaign expense.

 

"Neither the Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign was a party to the transaction with Ms. Clifford, and neither reimbursed me for the payment, either directly or indirectly," Cohen said in a statement issued on Tuesday night.

 

Daniels was quoted as saying in a 2011 interview with In Touch Weekly that she had an affair with Trump after they met at a Lake Tahoe golf tournament in 2006.

 

Trump has denied having an affair with Daniels.

 

The Wall Street Journal first reported in January that Trump lawyer Michael Cohen had paid $130,000 to Daniels in 2016, the year Trump won the presidential election.

 

In his most detailed account yet of what happened, Cohen said in his statement that the payment was a "private transaction". He did not explain why he made the payment or say whether Trump was aware of it.

 

The White House referred questions about the payment to Cohen.

 

Cohen's statement was in response to a complaint filed at the Federal Election Commission by the Common Cause watchdog group.

 

Common Cause argued in its complaint that the payment amounts to a campaign contribution well in excess of the $2,700 limit to the amount any individual can give, and it has asked the FEC to enforce campaign finance laws.

 

"The complaint alleges that I somehow violated campaign finance laws by facilitating an excess, in-kind contribution.  The allegations in the complaint are factually unsupported and without legal merit, and my counsel has submitted a response to the FEC," Cohen said.

 

"Just because something isn't true doesn't mean that it can't cause you harm or damage. I will always protect Mr. Trump," Cohen said, adding that he would not comment further.

 

Common Cause said on Wednesday that the timing and circumstances of the payment "make it appear that the hush money was paid to Daniels in an effort to influence the election." It called on the FEC to conduct a full investigation.

 

The FEC confirmed it received Common Cause's complaint and declined to comment on the case.

 

Daniels' manager, Gina Rodriguez, told Reuters that by issuing the statement, Cohen was in violation of a non-disclosure agreement with Daniels about the matter and that Daniels believes she can now talk about it publicly.

 

"Yes, Stormy is going to talk," she said via direct message on Twitter. She did not immediately respond to a question about when and where Daniels would be speaking publicly.

 

(Reporting by Steve Holland and Ginger Gibson in Washington, and Nichola Groom in Los Angeles; editing by Kieran Murray)

 
reuters_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-02-15
Link to comment
Share on other sites


3 hours ago, webfact said:

Daniels' manager, Gina Rodriguez, told Reuters that by issuing the statement, Cohen was in violation of a non-disclosure agreement with Daniels about the matter and that Daniels believes she can now talk about it publicly.

 

"Yes, Stormy is going to talk," she said via direct message on Twitter. She did not immediately respond to a question about when and where Daniels would be speaking publicly.

Stock up your popcorn reserves. This should be fun. Especially when then asked what the religious groups think about Trump. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, oilinki said:

Stock up your popcorn reserves. This should be fun. Especially when then asked what the religious groups think about Trump. 

 

 

Not really. She will talk they had a stormy affair, he will deny, either in person or via his lawyer, slap a law suit on her for violating the agreement, and that will be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not the sharpest tool in the shed.
probably better to say "it is true, tasty bit, and the wife knows about it, but since he was out of town does understand because he is such a strong man !!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevenl said:

Not really. She will talk they had a stormy affair, he will deny, either in person or via his lawyer, slap a law suit on her for violating the agreement, and that will be it.

Maybe not

 

Stormy Daniels 'free to tell her story' after Trump lawyer statement

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-43055995

Edited by Bluespunk
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevenl said:

Not really. She will talk they had a stormy affair, he will deny, either in person or via his lawyer, slap a law suit on her for violating the agreement, and that will be it.

The agreement has already violated and has become void because Trump lawyer talked about it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, stevenl said:

That's what her manager said. Somehow I think Team Trump will not agree with that statement and will slap a law suit on her.

Yeah, maybe...maybe not. 

 

Lets wait and see, but if the trump side has indeed violated the agreement with this revelation, it’s hard to see how they’ll win. 

 

I’m not too interested in the details of what happened, to be honest, but the admission of payments to her, in itself further damages his credibility, it’s all good. 

Edited by Bluespunk
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Yeah, maybe...maybe not. 

 

Lets wait and see, but if the trump side has indeed violated the agreement with this revelation, it’s hard to see how they’ll win. 

 

I’m not too interested in the details of what happened, to be honest, but the admission of payments to her, in itself further damages his credibility, it’s all good. 

They don't have to win, all they have to do is slap so many and expensive law suits on her that it is not attractive for her to continue with it.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stevenl said:

They don't have to win, all they have to do is slap so many and expensive law suits on her that it is not attractive for her to continue with it.

As I said, let’s wait and see. 

 

No matter what happens it’s all going to reflect negatively on trump. 

 

It’s  all good. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Carib said:

Wish I had a lawyer like that.. must be a first, usually lawyers rob you blind, this one pays your bills even if the isn't supposed to be a bill. :whistling:

Yep.

Because he didn't.

Lawyers don't do that.

As "trump" is fond of saying -- everyone knows that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, stevenl said:

They don't have to win, all they have to do is slap so many and expensive law suits on her that it is not attractive for her to continue with it.

There might be the "Melanie" effect.

If it's proven that Clifford had sexual relations with Trump, any prenuptial agreement between Trump and Melanie might be unenforceable assuming it favored Trump. Melanie would then have the financial resources to assure justice is done.

There may be legal flaws in the nondisclosure agreement itself - nondisclosure agreement was not co-signed by Melanie, possibly used to hide a crime and in itself did not use real names. 

"They don't have to win" but the public disclosures and depositions under oath might in themselves destroy the Trump presidency.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that the US has evolved into a country full of people living in glass houses who hoard rocks and dislike everyone around them who don't live in the same style of glass houses as do they.  :tongue:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a little about how the money may have gotten back to Cohen:

 

Trump’s Lawyer Says the Trump Campaign Didn’t Reimburse Him for His $130,000 Payment to Stormy Daniels. But …

There’s one catch, though: While rent is typically paid monthly, the Trump campaign, according to its FEC reports, made 14 rent payments in 2016. The dates of those payments:

 

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/02/michael-cohen-stormy-daniels-usd130-000-rent-payments-does-it-add-up.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""