Jump to content

Thaksin's daughter could become Thailand's next prime minister as Shinawatra's set for comeback


webfact

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, possum1931 said:

I remember as a young teenager Tony Benn wrote a weekly column in the Scottish Daily Record critising people for taking time of work for having a bad back. In those days people only got a two week paid holiday in a year plus extra days at Christmas and New year, while Benn got 3 months paid holiday a year as an MP. So he cannot be described as a hypocrite??

This is a man who was a Labour MP. The labour party, the party of the working class?? What a joke.

Do you mean the man who was The Right Honourable Anthony Neil Wedgwood Benn, Viscount Stansgate before he renounced his title?  Who went Westminster School and Oxford?  A man of the people indeed, rumour is that he saw a street once.  ???? 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Red Forever said:

Just the mention of Thaksin is like the bell was to Pavlov's dog.

Please people, understand that Thaksin doesn't need more power or more money. 

He was already a multi billionaire before he entered politics. 

Way I see it is that the vast majority of Thai citizens want Thaksinism over Hi So elitism and I think they're right.

""" Please people, understand that Thaksin doesn't need more power or more money. 

He was already a multi billionaire before he entered politics. """

 

You sure about that? The history seems to mention that he became a billionaire when he sold parts of AIS to Temasuk the sovereign investment arm of the singapore gov't.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, worgeordie said:

He provided free healthcare for foreigners'  ,that was a good

thing, I had 6 months free treatment , then when the new government

came in it began to dismantle everything he had done, as new governments

do , even if they were good ,

regards worgeordie

" He provided free healthcare for foreigners'  ,that was a good

thing, ..."

 

Can you expand on that please, been here well over 3 decades and I can't remember that.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Lacessit said:

You've reminded me of a joke that was doing the rounds some years ago.

 

Q: What's the difference between a social worker and a rottweiler?

 

A: The rottweiler sometimes gives the child back.

 

Must remember that one....555

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it seems now that would make future forward to struggle more for a young generation.

But closer to election it would be clear, that PT is cooking an alliance with Prawit, in order to push out Prayut out and bring Thaksin by a back door. Young generation would not support such political shenanigans 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Am I correct? A PM here must get a majority vote from the combined House of Reps (500 seats) plus the Senate (250 seats) = total 750, so a majority would be 376.

 

2. There are only 375 directly elected seats in the House of Reps (plus the 125 party-list seats) - so one cannot be PM even if you win every lower house directly elected seat (if you are not supported by tge Senate/Junta).

 

3. The lady in the OP seems to be a bit of a dreamer - her task is monumental.

Edited by law ling
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unlikely scenario and not much changed since Sarit and Phibul except, that the money in the past was pumped into Thailand in form of nine digit dollar amounts; now it's the Chinese turn. 

It takes more than Shinawatra as a last name to unseat the generalissimo, latter being there while the taking is good (and it still is, see submarines - albeit without engines -, air force and railway grid plans across the country). 

Interesting enough is, that Dr Thaksin has been out of the country for staggering 14 years now and still can call very loud shots from faraway lands. This is not only, because he the strong man of opposing thoughts but also documents the very weakness of all those other parties, operating and led by "leaders" from within Thailand.

Paetongtarn Shinawatra will be a placeholder, as her auntie Yingluck, but most Thais meanwhile could live with this. She just has to be prepared for the mother of all battles against Anutin with his high aspirations and do not forget Thammanat's miraculous conversion from baking flour to illicit substances which booked him an FOC stay at the Sydney Hilton. It will be a very dirty and nasty all-out an episode of Game of Thrones - Thai-style. 

For all the dirty farangs = get popcorn and the Laz-y-boy recliners ready; it is showtime anytime soon again ???? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Isaanlife
8 hours ago, BritManToo said:

They only need to kill the generals ..........

The Thai military has more than 1,700 flag officers (generals and admirals), roughly one general for every 212 troops

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Anyone would be better. Even Porn the Som Tam gal, or Nit the maid would be a better leader than the TRex.

 

Covid exploded due to an extreme lack of experience and skill, coupled with favoritism toward the cronies, tourism was destroyed, the economy was decimated, real estate tanked, exports dropped, suicide skyrocketed and so did homelessness, unemployment and desperation. 

 

Congrats Prayuth. Your mission is nearly complete. 

Could not have said it better. Even Putin is smarter than that what we have now

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:
9 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

That is false, Yingluck was not "ousted by the current government", she was not even PM at the time of the coup.   She had been removed from her position by the Constitutional Court before the coup.

Finish the story, go on, why don't you? 

 

Something along the lines of "she was however Pheu Thai's candidate for Prime Minister, and very, very likely to be returned to power. There was a particular imperative which demanded the Army and the "old gang" be in power, definitely not Pheu Thai and certainly not a Shinawattra, so the election was replaced by a coup, and a military government installed."

 

After all, we all know just what a stickler for the very truth you are in such matters!????

It's interesting that you seem to see something wrong with pointing out a completely false statement.  It's a pity that there aren't a few more posters here who prefer to see the truth published. 

 

Yingluck was not ousted by the coup, there can be no argument about that as she was not PM at the time.   What you see in your crystal ball about what may have happened in the future is irrelevant to the facts of the time.

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, webfact said:

"He's not in charge of Pheu Thai any more but we always consult him of course.

 

"You wouldn't expect anything otherwise in a close family like ours".

Not really.  If you're the Prime Minister I think most people would expect you not to be taking orders from an unelected person.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 4MyEgo said:
9 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

That is false, Yingluck was not "ousted by the current government", she was not even PM at the time of the coup.   She had been removed from her position by the Constitutional Court before the coup.

Have you ever asked yourself who controls who, what, where and when in the LOS ?

 

Ever heard of a witch hunt, she is fortunate they allowed her to exit, could it be because they fearing another bloody uprising, or was it their only choice.

 

After all, it's not as if they want to be seen dipping their fingers into the gravy train, and perhaps be embarrassed by the lose an expensive watch or two at the same time, borrowed from a friend of course.

My comment was a correction to a false statement in the OP, nothing more.  What I have "ever asked myself", or "heard of", is neither here nor there.  She was not ousted by the coup.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

Not really.  If you're the Prime Minister I think most people would expect you not to be taking orders from an unelected person.

100% wrong,

I don't think there would be a single person in Thailand that thought Yingluck wasn't taking orders from Thaksin.

That was why she was elected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Will B Good said:

I thought Rottweilers were quiet, rather shy and very well behaved little doggies.

no, you're thinking about cats, not dogs!

They both have hair and tails, but one is fierce and the other is a pussy.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

100% wrong,

I don't think there would be a single person in Thailand that thought Yingluck wasn't taking orders from Thaksin.

That was why she was elected.

You misunderstand me.  Of course Yingluck was a proxy for Thaksin, as would this girl be.  But it isn't something normal and run of the mill.  "Of course we will take orders from our exiled father, what else would you expect from a close family?" - we know it will happen, but it isn't "expected" in terms of how a democracy is meant to function.  (And yes, I know she would be elected based on the fact that everyone knows that she would be taking orders from her father, but I feel my point still stands.)  But hey, TiT!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...