Jump to content

Takeaways from the ruling granting Trump's request for a special master in Mar-a-Lago probe


Recommended Posts

Posted

Federal Courthouse built in 1962, Houston, Texas | Library ...

(CNN)  A federal judge threw a wrench Monday in the Justice Department investigation into potential mishandling of documents from former President Donald Trump's White House by granting his request for a special master to review evidence seized from his Florida home last month.

The win for Trump temporarily prevents the Justice Department's investigative team from accessing the thousands of documents -- some of which are marked as classified -- taken from Mar-a-Lago.
 
US District Judge Aileen Cannon cleared the way for a third-party attorney to review all the seized materials, not just for documents covered by attorney-client privilege -- the circumstance in which special masters are usually used -- but also for potential executive privilege concerns, a move the Justice Department has said would be "unprecedented."
 

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/05/politics/takeaways-trump-cannon-mar-a-lago-special-master/index.html

 

CNN-logo-July-4-2020-e1593906141959-300x

Posted
1 minute ago, placeholder said:

The acting head of Nara sought permission from Biden to disallow claims of executive privilege on the part of trump. Button authorized her to do whatever she thought best. That was the extent of his involvement. 

And executive privilege resides with the sitting President.

  • Confused 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

And executive privilege resides with the sitting President.

A former president can exercise privilege over the release of documents. 

 

Before releasing any records of a former President, the Archivist of the United States must notify both the incumbent President and the former President of any records which the Archivist believes may be subject to a claim of Executive privilege. Each President then has 30 days to submit the claim in writing to the Archivist.

Incumbent President
The incumbent President consults with the Attorney General and the Counsel to the President. If the President chooses to submit a claim of Executive privilege, the Archivist will not release the privileged records unless directed to do so by an incumbent President or by a final court order.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_12667
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Scott said:

A former president can exercise privilege over the release of documents. 

 

Before releasing any records of a former President, the Archivist of the United States must notify both the incumbent President and the former President of any records which the Archivist believes may be subject to a claim of Executive privilege. Each President then has 30 days to submit the claim in writing to the Archivist.

Incumbent President
The incumbent President consults with the Attorney General and the Counsel to the President. If the President chooses to submit a claim of Executive privilege, the Archivist will not release the privileged records unless directed to do so by an incumbent President or by a final court order.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_12667

Correct, but a sitting President can override him.

Posted
Just now, thaibeachlovers said:

Excellent news.

Hopefully that will stop any leaks happening.

Well, if you mean by excellent that it will delay the inquiry, then you may have a point.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Well, if you mean by excellent that it will delay the inquiry, then you may have a point.

I suspect that if they delay too long, once the GOP takes the house back in November, the "inquiry" will quietly fade away.

I don't envy whoever has to make the decision, given the potential political implications.

Charge him before the elections and the inevitable accusations of politicking will arise; wait till after the elections and potentially lose the opportunity to disqualify the Donald from running in 2024.

  • Sad 1
Posted
2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I suspect that if they delay too long, once the GOP takes the house back in November, the "inquiry" will quietly fade away.

I don't envy whoever has to make the decision, given the potential political implications.

Charge him before the elections and the inevitable accusations of politicking will arise; wait till after the elections and potentially lose the opportunity to disqualify the Donald from running in 2024.

Oh so that’s the ‘political interference in Justice’ you’ve been banging on about.

 

Its your hope for the future.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, placeholder said:

What you don't seem to understand is that all this began with Trump's refusal to return documents that he had no business having including classified documents. All he had to do was return the documents when asked and this would have been over. Instead, he actually refused to comply with a Grand Jury subpoena. He claimed that he was cooperating with NARA  but this turned out to be false. His attorneys clearly lied about the absence of all classified documents still in Trump's possession. 

If this turns into a criminal investigation, as seems likely, it will be entirely Trump's fault. Unless you believe that an ex-President is above the law.

It’s a bit of a conundrum as to why Trump did not simply return the documents.

 

But then we learn about ‘empty folders’, which raises the question, had he already ‘disposed’ of those documents by the time he was asked to return them?

 

He’s clearly got a lot of explaining to do.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...