Jump to content

Takeaways from the ruling granting Trump's request for a special master in Mar-a-Lago probe


Recommended Posts

Posted

An interesting question that is surely being addressed is, who has the security clearance to view the documents as a ‘Special Master’?

 

Clearly it’s not going to be some attorney appointed by the Judge.

 

The nature of the documents suggests it can only be some working for the Government, I would be very surprised if even the FBI has agents with the necessary clearances.

 

So most likely someone working for Government National Security.

 

Are these then the seeds of the next whacked out conspiracy theory?

 

My guess is it won’t get that far, the DOJ will appeal the Judges order.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Even Bill Barr who has obviously taken the antidote for the Trump Kool-Aid has said that it is totally wrong, and the FBI should appeal.

 

Bill Barr says a special master won't fundamentally change much for Trump and represents a 'rain delay for a couple of innings' | Business Insider Africa

 

Perhaps 11th Circuit Court of Appeal Chief Justice Clarence Thomas will recuse himself and re-habilitate his credibility. 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

IMO that could apply to the present investigation into the documents as well. What happens if they don't find anything to indict him for?

More whataboutery.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, billd766 said:

But it is only your opinion and you are politically biased.

 

What is needed is an independent opinion and application.

 

What ever happens, one side will not accept the results.

"What is needed is an independent opinion and application".

 

A verdict by a jury of Trump's peers at the US Supreme Court trial will ultimately provide that!

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, DezLez said:

I wonder what other "avatars" "it" is using to spread identical cr@p as some others?

They likely all have the same Twitter or Truth B.S. sources

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

An interesting question that is surely being addressed is, who has the security clearance to view the documents as a ‘Special Master’?

 

Clearly it’s not going to be some attorney appointed by the Judge.

 

The nature of the documents suggests it can only be some working for the Government, I would be very surprised if even the FBI has agents with the necessary clearances.

 

So most likely someone working for Government National Security.

 

Are these then the seeds of the next whacked out conspiracy theory?

 

My guess is it won’t get that far, the DOJ will appeal the Judges order.

 

Y'know, I thought about this, and then I realized it may be much simpler than it first appears.

 

First off, there are undoubtedly many attorneys with the proper clearances; if not in Florida, then certainly in and around Washington D.C. 

 

Secondly, the Special Master would not necessarily need to have the top security clearances. Why? Because any document requiring a security clearance............  automatically falls outside the Special Master's area of interest.

 

No documents requiring a security clearance could be part of the "personal" or "privileged" documentation the Special Master is supposed to be on the lookout for. So the Special Master would not have a reason to be looking at them, anyway!

 

So, even if the Special Master himself doesn't possess the proper clearances............. all that's needed is for the Special Master to be working along side a person who does.

 

The Special Master filters out the privileged communications the government shouldn't be looking at............ and their high security-clearanced co-worker........... filters out the sensitive materials the Special Master shouldn't be looking at!

 

Easy!

  • Haha 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, ullman said:

You people here actually expect Trump to be indicted for a doc dispute? If you do, you are clearly deluded.

But, despite the questionable leaks to WAPO, what and where does a state or fed prosecutor take this silly doc dispute?

 

The nuclear codes leak, where's the evidence, somewhere in the 22 pages of redactions in the affidavit? I doubt it. And since the NARA dispute was about Trump having the cited docs in his possession, now that they have been taken during the raid, in possesion of the DOJ, or government whats all the fuss about now?

 

This is nothing more than a stunt to distract Americans from Biden and his disaster admin and the out of control problems plaguing America in hopes of curtailing the blowout elections loses they face in November.

A doc dispute? You think it's just because they were pieces of paper with writing on them that makes for all this fuss? It depends on what was written on them. Apart from the fact that Trump's people apparently lied most likely at his behest, which would be obstruction of justice and that he refused to obey a grand jury subpoena, another crime, the fact is that he left the information highly classified documents exposed to possible enemy acquisition. A resort with guest everywhere is hardly a secure place. The Secret Service is there but to guard the President and his family, not to guard documents. People have been jailed for what he did. Why should he get a break?

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, ullman said:

You people here actually expect Trump to be indicted for a doc dispute? If you do, you are clearly deluded.

But, despite the questionable leaks to WAPO, what and where does a state or fed prosecutor take this silly doc dispute?

 

The nuclear codes leak, where's the evidence, somewhere in the 22 pages of redactions in the affidavit? I doubt it. And since the NARA dispute was about Trump having the cited docs in his possession, now that they have been taken during the raid, in possesion of the DOJ, or government whats all the fuss about now?

 

This is nothing more than a stunt to distract Americans from Biden and his disaster admin and the out of control problems plaguing America in hopes of curtailing the blowout elections loses they face in November.

Trump leaked the raid on Mar-a-Lago. More likely that DOJ would not have released any information about it until Trump was indicted after mid-term elections.

So how is this a stunt to distract America from Biden?

 

Edited by LosLobo
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Trump leaked the raid on Mar-a-Lago

Thats false. Media reported it, and what does it matter?

Edited by ullman
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, ullman said:

Thats false. Media reported it, and what does it matter?

If it is false, please provide the evidence? I suggest that it does matter as it would prove that you have no credibility.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...