8 minutes ago, transam said:

Got a link for that, to enlighten us.....?

You can start with 18 U.S. Code § 1591 - Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Allegedly.

 

More likely is she was a well paid escort operating under her own free will and living the life of riley.

 

I know which theory I find most likely. 

 

She was under the age of 18, and therefore not legally competent to give conscientious to engage in paid.

Regardless of which paid sex with someone under the age of 18 is a federal crime.

 

Refer link in previous post above.

11 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You clear do not understand the law, certainly not US Federal (extra territorial) Law as it relates to trafficking US citizens for sex and the age of consent to engage in paid sex (regardless of who is doing the paying).

 

 

 

 

Trafficked? ????

 

The only traffic she was involved in was Belgravia rush hour from the back of a chauffeur driven Limo.

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

She was under the age of 18, and therefore not legally competent to give conscientious to engage in paid.

Regardless of which paid sex with someone under the age of 18 is a federal crime.

 

Refer link in previous post above.

Paid sex?

 

Could you provide a link to the evidence of this please.

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You can start with 18 U.S. Code § 1591 - Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion

Can you provide the link you read to make your post....Please

4 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Trafficked? ????

 

The only traffic she was involved in was Belgravia rush hour from the back of a chauffeur driven Limo.

Making a joke out of of sexual exploitation of a young woman because you don’t have an argument Anglo at the legal facts.

3 minutes ago, transam said:

Can you provide the link you read to make your post....Please

I didn’t read a link to make my post.

 

I’ve provided a link to Federal Law per your request, deal with it.

4 minutes ago, petermik said:

No he cannot all he wants to do is TROL......

By providing links to the relevant law and not engaging in personal attacks.

 

 

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I didn’t read a link to make my post.

 

I’ve provided a link to Federal Law per your request, deal with it.

What does the Federal law say about you making wild assumptions about a British Prince paying for sexual exploitation.....?

3 hours ago, 2baht said:

23 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

What "justice" is there for him to "face" that he is not facing?  Are you suggesting that he's been indicted for something?

Surely, Andy boy agreeing to pay $21 million USD in compensation is an admission of guilt! Why otherwise would he agree?

What's your question got to do with the assertion that "he's not facing justice"?   Are you under the impression that there are criminal charges against him?

1 minute ago, transam said:

What does the Federal law say about you making wild assumptions about a British Prince paying for sexual exploitation.....?

I never made such an allegation.

 

Please provide a link where I did.

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

Making a joke out of of sexual exploitation of a young woman because you don’t have an argument Anglo at the legal facts.

Sexual exploitation? ???? Please provide a link to the evidence of this sexual exploitation.

 

The only evidence I can see of exploitation was when Andrew was exploited for his lack of good judgement to the tune of 12 million quid. Link to said exploitation below.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-60667111

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

By providing links to the relevant law and not engaging in personal attacks.

 

 

You are making personal attacks, personal, unfounded attacks on Prince Andrew...

 

You are a disgrace to the UK......????

Just now, JonnyF said:

Sexual exploitation? ???? Please provide a link to the evidence of this sexual exploitation.

 

The only evidence I can see of exploitation was when Andrew was exploited for his lack of good judgement to the tune of 12 million quid. Link to said exploitation below.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-60667111

 

 

 

The woman in question was under 18 at the time.

 

Refer Federal Law I linked above, it is very clear on the matter.

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

The woman in question was under 18 at the time.

 

Refer Federal Law I linked above, it is very clear on the matter.

Post it, you quote from it, post it.......????

1 minute ago, transam said:

You are making personal attacks, personal, unfounded attacks on Prince Andrew...

 

You are a disgrace to the UK......????

No I am not.

 

I have stated he was credibly accused of sex crimes, I provided a link to the US court filing - matters of fact.

 

I have not engaged in attacks on Prince Andrew other than to state facts recorded in court records.

 

 

A baiting post and a reply have been removed

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

No I am not.

 

I have stated he was credibly accused of sex crimes, I provided a link to the US court filing - matters of fact.

 

I have not engaged in attacks on Prince Andrew other than to state facts recorded in court records.

 

 

So why is he out walking, why are you trying to bury him with USA stuff, after all, you claim to be British....?

4 minutes ago, transam said:

Post it, you quote from it, post it.......????

Enjoy:

 

18 U.S. Code § 1591 - Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1591

1 minute ago, transam said:

So why is he out walking, why are you trying to bury him with USA stuff, after all, you claim to be British....?

I have never claimed to be British.

 

In fact I have never once posted any confirmation of my nationality on this forum.

 

Quit being personal, stop making stuff up.

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

Enjoy:

 

18 U.S. Code § 1591 - Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1591

Thank you, so why is the Prince out walking, and why you a British National, is trying to bury him......?

46 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Give me some examples of were I have labelled peaceful protests as ‘hate speech’?

 

Or do you feel you can just make stuff up?!

You label anything you do not agree with as hate speech

16 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

What's your question got to do with the assertion that "he's not facing justice"?   Are you under the impression that there are criminal charges against him?

No, I am under the impression that he admitted guilt for his actions by paying such an exorbitant price for it to go away, no more, no less! Justice was never mentioned on my part.

1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Good news. I hope he gets the maximum sentence.

Heckling, that's a pretty serious crime, do you think life would be sufficient? ????

24 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The woman in question was under 18 at the time.

 

Refer Federal Law I linked above, it is very clear on the matter.

But what evidence do you have that a crime was committed?

 

Link to all the evidence please.

1 minute ago, 2baht said:

Heckling, that's a pretty serious crime, do you think life would be sufficient? ????

Who you like me to shout, AH, at your mums' funeral.....?

8 minutes ago, 2baht said:

No, I am under the impression that he admitted guilt for his actions by paying such an exorbitant price for it to go away, no more, no less! Justice was never mentioned on my part.

He never admitted guilt.

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

But what evidence do you have that a crime was committed?

 

Link to all the evidence please.

You'll be lucky...................????

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

He never admitted guilt.

Oh, sorry, it was a $21 mill donation for her well being, was'nt it? Nice!

1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Good news. I hope he gets the maximum sentence.

Personally I would've liked the guy that dragged him backwards to have dished out a bit of justice.