-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
-
Latest posts...
-
-
56
US Tourist's Temple Graffiti Sparks Outrage in Chiang Mai
Says the low info poster. -
2
Uneducated, ill-informed, ignorant, or lying doctors at the "best" hospital?
Take her to another hospital for a second opinion. -
1,141
Updates and events in the War in Ukraine 2025
Chinese keyboard warriors taking the mick out of Putin after Ukraine drone attack on bombers Users on platforms like Guancha labelled Russia a “weak empire” and called its military outdated. One commenter jeered, “They only care about food,” while another joked about reclaiming land lost to Russia in the 19th century. Some users invoked the Treaty of Aigun (1858), which saw Russia seize massive territory from China, including Vladivostok. “We’ll be ready to take back what’s ours,” one comment read ominously. China Mocks ‘Weak’ Putin After Ukraine’s Devastating Pearl Harbour-Style Strike -
75
Trump Justice Department Probes Biden’s Use of Autopen in Controversial Family Pardons
Read and learn......if that is possible for a trumpie maga. Sorry that you wet your knickers thinking anything different!! Have a cup of cocoa and go to bed, there's a good boy. Whether the President May Sign a Bill by Directing That His Signature Be Affixed to It The President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he approves and decides to sign in order for the bill to become law. Rather, the President may sign a bill within the meaning of Article I, Section 7 by directing a subordinate to affix the President’s signature to such a bill, for example by autopen. July 7, 2005 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT https://www.justice.gov/file/494411/dl?inline NB The above 2005 opinion was written by Howard C. Nielson Jr., who is now a Federal District Court judge in Utah, nominated to the position by Mr. Trump during his first term. -
46
Health Covid Cases Spike in Thailand: 28,000 New Cases in Just Two Days
I saw a program on Channel News Asia a couple of years back. The presenter went to a lab to test the effectiveness of wearing a mask. It was shown that without a mask, a sneeze or cough would expel droplets around 6 to 8 feet. With a mask on, the droplets were confined to around one foot. It has always been my honest opinion that the main purpose of wearing a mask is to reduce the chance of spreading a virus to someone else as opposed to preventing an individual from catching the virus from someone else. That program was just a general investigation and covid wasnt mentioned at all.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now