126 pages, but no cigar

Just want to send my condolences, as I know how much you were affected in 2016. I don't keep up with the discussion nowadays but stay calm, 4 years passes quickly. 

On 11/19/2024 at 8:27 PM, Dan747 said:

She is, what, not Vice President any more......?  

A post with an image containing profane language has been removed:

• You will not post vulgarities, obscenities or profanities.

I started this topic.

Obviously VP Harris lost the election to felon Donald Trump.

So she won't be president any more than Matt Gaetz (now available to do CAMEO videos) will be Attorney General. 

I don't see the point for this topic to continue except as a platform for SORE WINNERS.

38 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

I started this topic.

Obviously VP Harris lost the election to felon Donald Trump.

So she won't be president any more than Matt Gaetz (now available to do CAMEO videos) will be Attorney General. 

I don't see the point for this topic to continue except as a platform for SORE WINNERS.

 

🤣

2 minutes ago, jimmybcool said:

 

🤣

If you say so. 

I can say that I haven't shed one tear about the fact that felon Trump won.

I'm comforted by the fact that Americans are going to get the government they deserve. 

But really the original purpose of THIS topic is done and dusted

1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

I started this topic.

Obviously VP Harris lost the election to felon Donald Trump.

So she won't be president any more than Matt Gaetz (now available to do CAMEO videos) will be Attorney General. 

I don't see the point for this topic to continue except as a platform for SORE WINNERS.

That's funny. The purpose of the thread declaring Kamala as the president was originally supposed to be your sore winner thread. The purpose now serves as a reminder of how conceited and arrogant you and your ilk were.

On 11/15/2024 at 7:50 PM, Yellowtail said:

That would be a better with Tulsi...

 

 

The problem with Tulsi is unles she wears very thick make up she has the complexion of Freddy Krueger. 

I'm now going to formally request this OUTDATED topic be CLOSED.

It's become a TROLL MAGNET.

That doesn't mean that it will be closed, but I am making the request.

On 11/24/2024 at 9:16 PM, Jingthing said:

I'm now going to formally request this OUTDATED topic be CLOSED.

It's become a TROLL MAGNET.

That doesn't mean that it will be closed, but I am making the request.

When the game's not going your way, take your ball and go home? 

Kamala says she is staying in the fight so I think the thread is still relevant. Will she run in 2028?

I don't believe ANY of the DEM money sources will back a Kamala run in 2028.  And if some did I don't think she stands a chance of winning the DEM primary.  It was very clear how phony she is.  There isn't a real person behind that facade and the electorate could see that.  She has never won a single state in a DEM primary.  I have to believe the DEM party learned something this year and decides to start running candidates not mired in the far left policies some DEMs endorse.

 

They had some middle of the road members like Sinema and Joe Manchin.  As a conservative I didn't agree with everything they did but they were SANE, had ethics they stuck with in the face of attack from their own party, and not living in an alternate reality.  If one were elevated to winning the presidency I wouldn't be upset. 

6 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

Kamala says she is staying in the fight so I think the thread is still relevant. Will she run in 2028?

No.

2 hours ago, jimmybcool said:

I don't believe ANY of the DEM money sources will back a Kamala run in 2028.  And if some did I don't think she stands a chance of winning the DEM primary.  It was very clear how phony she is.  There isn't a real person behind that facade and the electorate could see that.  She has never won a single state in a DEM primary.  I have to believe the DEM party learned something this year and decides to start running candidates not mired in the far left policies some DEMs endorse.

 

They had some middle of the road members like Sinema and Joe Manchin.  As a conservative I didn't agree with everything they did but they were SANE, had ethics they stuck with in the face of attack from their own party, and not living in an alternate reality.  If one were elevated to winning the presidency I wouldn't be upset. 

Manchin and Sinema have very little support among democrats so pushing them is silly. I agree Harris is over as a presidential option.

Let's focus on the midtrrms first and see if congress can be flipped.

 

8 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

Kamala says she is staying in the fight so I think the thread is still relevant. Will she run in 2028?

All the time she is earning, why not..............

On 7/26/2024 at 6:20 PM, Jingthing said:

Very mature.

 

On 7/27/2024 at 9:25 PM, Jingthing said:

Harris has the joyful energy and communication skills to both communicate a positive Fresh freedom vision of democratic leadership and painting the dark dystopia truth of a second term for the felonious dotard.

 

 

Unfortunately that joyful energy only excited people who would never vote for a Republican anyway.

On 11/24/2024 at 9:16 PM, Jingthing said:

I'm now going to formally request this OUTDATED topic be CLOSED.

It's become a TROLL MAGNET.

That doesn't mean that it will be closed, but I am making the request.

You are the one perpetuating this thread, as you keep posting over and over. 

If you have reasons to want it closed, contact the admin directly.

Surely there must be enough forums back in the US, to discuss things largely

unrelated to Asean.

On 11/16/2024 at 3:13 AM, blaze master said:

 

And not running a other woman will be their continued downfall. Kamala was the wrong one it was clear as day.

 

Besides. What is a woman ?

The politically incorrect answer is someone that can have a child.

 

Harris wasn't their only mistake. HRC was wrong too. Had she not been the candidate it's likely the Dems would have won and we'd be spared zillions of posts whining about Trump ever since.

1 hour ago, suzannegoh said:

Unfortunately that joyful energy only excited people who would never vote for a Republican anyway.

Not unfortunately at all. Had she won we'd have 4 more years of disastrous Biden policies.

7 minutes ago, arithai12 said:

You are the one perpetuating this thread, as you keep posting over and over. 

If you have reasons to want it closed, contact the admin directly.

Surely there must be enough forums back in the US, to discuss things largely

unrelated to Asean.

Surely there are.

On 11/25/2024 at 3:09 AM, Cryingdick said:

 

The problem with Tulsi is unles she wears very thick make up she has the complexion of Freddy Krueger. 

That's sexist. No one would expect a male candidate to wear makeup.

I'm no feminist supporter, but when it comes to politics we should not get bogged down in such trivialities as their complexion.

1 hour ago, arithai12 said:

You are the one perpetuating this thread, as you keep posting over and over. 

If you have reasons to want it closed, contact the admin directly.

Surely there must be enough forums back in the US, to discuss things largely

unrelated to Asean.

 

He wants to be able to post his responses then have the thread closed so that he can have the last word...  🙄

2 hours ago, suzannegoh said:

On 7/27/2024 at 9:25 PM, Jingthing said:

Harris has the joyful energy and communication skills to both communicate a positive Fresh freedom vision of democratic leadership and painting the dark dystopia truth of a second term for the felonious dotard.

Unfortunately that joyful energy only excited people who would never vote for a Republican anyway.

 

It's honestly surreal to imagine that anyone can have the impression of Harris that Jingthing outlines above.  Any sensible person finds her completely fake and creepy.  It can only be that they hate Donald Trump, or want their side to win, so much, that they convince themselves of the unbelievable.