A flame has been removed

36 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

Trump is and was an absolute disaster. The no war story is debunked.

This is general knowledge across the world (perhaps not in Ohio) so don't bother asking for a link. 

No wars. whatsoever. were started during Trump's presidency.

TRUMP

42 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

That is so unfair.....no fact checking allowed.

Trump throwing a hissy fit because his lies were fact checked: Trump calls for 'dishonest' ABC to lose license following debate fact-check (msn.com)

Just now, FritsSikkink said:

Trump throwing a hissy fit because his lies were fact checked: Trump calls for 'dishonest' ABC to lose license following debate fact-check (msn.com)

 

 

Crazy isn't it?......WHY CAN'T I LIE.....SO UNFAIR.

Harris for the win.... Trump did not look up to it... He is scheduled for court right?

 

1 hour ago, maesariang said:

Left wing

 

And you are...?

2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Maybe they will not have moderators that jump in to attack Trump. That was a disgrace. The moderators are not there to take sides.

Harris has apparently asked Trump for another in October. He should only agree if it's not on any MSM media, and certainly not with a biased moderator.

You should read this: Donald Trump no longer knows how to talk to anyone outside his base (msn.com)

15 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

And you are...?

Independent

7 minutes ago, maesariang said:

23 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

And you are...?

Independent

 

2 hours ago, maesariang said:

ABC is the most biased. 3 vs 1 in a debate. Never called Harris out on her lies and deflection.

 

1 hour ago, maesariang said:

No votes in 2019, no votes in 2023. She does not deserve anything.

 

1 hour ago, maesariang said:

Trump answered more questions than Biden and Harris combined.

 

1 hour ago, maesariang said:

Trump was good and Harris has done nothing. Totally illogical to give the idiot Harris a chance.

 

Yes, independent. Of course you are.

 

 

6 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, independent. Of course you are.

 

 

I am. Harris is an awful candidate choosen on gender and race. You are a Democrat. Candidates should be selected through the voting process not jump others based on DEI.

53 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

No wars. whatsoever. were started during Trump's presidency.

But there were wars no?

15 minutes ago, maesariang said:

Independent

Just now, maesariang said:

I am. Harris is an awful candidate choosen on gender and race. You are a Democrat. Candidates should be selected through the voting process not jump others based on DEI.

 

No, I am independent too. Worse still, I'm not even American.

 

I agree that there's little to cheer about from either party and their candidates, especially Kamala Harris. I can do that without bigging-up Trump.

 

Try it.

1 hour ago, Thingamabob said:

No wars. whatsoever. were started during Trump's presidency.

Biden didn't start any war too. Trump withholding military aids to Ukraine gave Putin the incentive to invade Ukraine. Trump withdrew the Iran Nuclear deal hardened the Iran hard-liners hatred of the West and fueled the arms race in Middle East. 

Now here's a scary thing to consider........... 

 

Trump insists he won the debate; he is so stupid and dumb that he thinks he won a debate in which he was completely outplayed and outclassed.

 

It would appear that many Republicans also thought the same, as have major news channels and news outlets, and they have stated as such......... now here is the scary thing about this, if this guy is so stupid to not be able to see or understand that he was hopelessly outplayed, how on earth would he hold up in a debate with a major world leader, going forward?? Especially now that he seems to have had severe mental decline.

 

It has already been seen that he is "controlled" by Putin, played with by Kim Jong and basically ignored by Xi Jinping, and other world leaders look upon him as plain dumb and even dumber than previously!

 

If this idiot were to be elected by some fluke, although if the cultist Trumpettes on this forum had their way he would be, because despite the overwhelming evidence they still think he is great and won the debate!!! Go figure?

1 minute ago, xylophone said:

Now here's a scary thing to consider........... 

 

Trump insists he won the debate; he is so stupid and dumb that he thinks he won a debate in which he was completely outplayed and outclassed.

 

It would appear that many Republicans also thought the same, as have major news channels and news outlets, and they have stated as such......... now here is the scary thing about this, if this guy is so stupid to not be able to see or understand that he was hopelessly outplayed, how on earth would he hold up in a debate with a major world leader, going forward??

 

It has already been seen that he is "controlled" by Putin, played with by Kim Jong and basically ignored by Xi Jinping, and other world leaders look upon him as plain dumb.

 

If this idiot were to be elected by some fluke, although if the cultist Trumpettes on this forum had their way he would be, because despite the overwhelming evidence they still think he is great and won the debate!!! Go figure?

Harris dodged questions and lied about abortion, project 25 etc. She won nothing.

2 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

No wars. whatsoever. were started during Trump's presidency.

Not true. There was a war on facts and truth from day 1.

1 minute ago, maesariang said:

Harris dodged questions and lied about abortion, project 25 etc. She won nothing.

In your opinion. Karl Rove and a slew of right wing commentators beg to disagree.

2 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

 

You just said "no wars".  (Fact checking you)

Is that the best you can do?

 

12 minutes ago, maesariang said:

ABC mods caught lying

 

 

Why is it that rightwinger consistently post long videos instead of text. Is that to emulate Trump who is notorious for preferring images over  text?

4 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

In your opinion. Karl Rove and a slew of right wing commentators beg to disagree.

Are you telling us that you respect Rove's opinions? I don't, and long before this.

4 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Are you telling us that you respect Rove's opinions? I don't, and long before this.

Rove's expertise lay in electoral politics. His egomania led him into making policy decisions he was clueless about. So on electoral issues, he's quite reliable. On other issues, not so much.

1 hour ago, NanLaew said:

 

No, I am independent too. Worse still, I'm not even American.

 

I agree that there's little to cheer about from either party and their candidates, especially Kamala Harris. I can do that without bigging-up Trump.

 

Try it.

I've always said on here that I like Trump's policies, but other than finding him entertaining, I'm not a fan.

However, when it's obvious that one or the other will be POTUS come January, one has to go with the less bad of two less than satisfactory candidates.

 

Trump is deeply flawed, but compared to her he is superman come to save us from the villains out to destroy the world.

1 minute ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Are you telling us that you respect Rove's opinions? I don't, and long before this.

Being disingenuous is such a silly debating tool. But just in case you're just plain "slow" I'll spell it out for you;

When lots of well-known pundits desperate for Trump to do well say he was a train wreck then that 'probably' means he didn't do too well in the debate.

Hope that clears up any confusion on your part.

1 hour ago, NanLaew said:

 

No, I am independent too. Worse still, I'm not even American.

Neither is the poster you're replying to.

2 hours ago, NanLaew said:

 

And you are...?

Bignok! 😀

5 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

Being disingenuous is such a silly debating tool. But just in case you're just plain "slow" I'll spell it out for you;

When lots of well-known pundits desperate for Trump to do well say he was a train wreck then that 'probably' means he didn't do too well in the debate.

Hope that clears up any confusion on your part.

I'm not confused. I listened to the debate start to finish and while it was somewhat petty squabbling over talking points without coming up with much at all, a train wreck it was not. I despise Harris, but even I thought she did OK. IMO it was a draw because neither managed a real body blow, no surprises, heard it all before.

Trump said Trump things, and Harris spoke in generalities.

The only things she seemed to be strong on was killing the unborn and giving some people's money to other people.

12 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I'm not confused. I listened to the debate start to finish and while it was somewhat petty squabbling over talking points without coming up with much at all, a train wreck it was not. I despise Harris, but even I thought she did OK. IMO it was a draw because neither managed a real body blow, no surprises, heard it all before.

Trump said Trump things, and Harris spoke in generalities.

The only things she seemed to be strong on was killing the unborn and giving some people's money to other people.

Wow, I applaud the degree of 'moral flexibility' involved in seeing a former prosecutor debating a convicted criminal and sex offender and preferring the latter and in addition have the gall to start blabbering about killing the unborn. 

Well done, you're a moral contortionist!