Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, morrobay said:

Right. And the LA Times ,  NY Times and the Washington Post are not giving an  endorsement to Harris. Almost unheard of for big 3 not to endorse the democratic candidate.

    The NY Times endorsed Harris.  The Post and the LA Times wanted to endorse Harris but the rich owners vetoed the endorsements.  

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Gecko123 said:

This tepid editorial response by corporate media isn't being done out of a lack of enthusiasm for Kamala Harris. It's being done out of a fear of retribution in the event of Trump reclaims the White House. Not only are they are afraid of retribution directed at their media interests, but their other corporate interests as well. Unlike so many Trump supporters on this forum, these media barons are well-aware of how Hitler cracked down on the media after he attained the Chancellorship in 1933. The thuggery of the SA and SS which Hitler used to accomplish this is the only component which is presently missing, but imagine an environment when the now incarcerated leaders of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers are pardoned by Trump and his no longer independent Justice department turns a blind eye towards political street thuggery. As I have said many times on this forum in the past, Trump supporters are going to pay dearly for their blinding ignorance of history.

 

Give it a rest. The Russia Hoax Brigade are now in full Hitler mode. 

 

 

 

 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

I can't see Harris winning. Her campaign has no traction.

 

Oddly, most people will vote for what they notice even if it's not a great option.

 

Where attention goes, energy flows.

 

That's what is behind a lot of Trumps antics.

 

Being ignored is worse then negative publicity.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Gecko123 said:

 

No, I mean that they will assess the character and capabilities of both candidates, as well as their commitment to democratic ideals and institutions, the constitution, and the truth, and which candidate will work towards unifying the American people rather than dividing them along racial and socio-economic lines.

 

Oh, so Trump. For a minute I thought you were I Harris supporter, sorry! 

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, newnative said:

    The NY Times endorsed Harris.  The Post and the LA Times wanted to endorse Harris but the rich owners vetoed the endorsements.  

Did any of them quit in protest? 

 

If I believed Trump was a fascist dictator, I would quit. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, Gecko123 said:

This tepid editorial response by corporate media isn't being done out of a lack of enthusiasm for Kamala Harris. It's being done out of a fear of retribution in the event Trump reclaims the White House. Not only are they afraid of retribution directed at their media interests, but retaliation directed at their other corporate interests as well. Consider how tax, anti-trust law, legal harassment, etc. could be used to punish media and corporate interests by a rogue, unchecked commander in chief.

 

Unlike so many Trump supporters on this forum, these media barons are well-aware of how Hitler cracked down on the media after he attained the Chancellorship in 1933. The thuggery of the SA and SS which Hitler used to accomplish this is the only component which is presently missing, but imagine an environment when the now incarcerated leaders of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers are pardoned by Trump, and his no-longer-independent Justice department turns a blind eye towards political street thuggery. As I have said many times on this forum in the past, Trump supporters are going to pay dearly for their blinding ignorance of history.

That's hilarious! 

Posted

Go Trump, GO!

 

i have become a TOTAL Trump supporter.

 

Thank's Harris.

 

You converted me, like nobody else could.

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

 

So by the right choice, did you mean open borders, mass illegal immigration, more DEI, higher taxes, more giveaways, men in girls’ showers, path to citizenship, free health care and tuition for illegals, housing subsidies for illegals, men in women’s sports and prisons, defunding the police, supporting rioters, and free transition surgery for prison inmates or Trump? 

So you are going with 10 year old female rape victims having to carry their rapist's baby.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

So you are going with 10 year old female rape victims having to carry their rapist's baby.

 

 

That's up to the democratically elected representatives of each state to decide, or the voters of each state to decide. Why do you hate democracy?

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

There may be something going on with the voters now. Looking at the data, there is an excess of women voters, something like 55-45 female-male for early voters.

 

This may explain why polling of early voters is so favorable to Harris.

 

There has never been an election like this, so maybe the gender gap is going to.be significant.

You sound like a 5-year-old in the corner hugging himself and comforting himself by saying that monsters arent real.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

That is the best endorsement of Kamala Harris this week.

 

So...

You have yet to see the light, I see.

 

You need immersion in the river.

 

Get baptized, My Son.

 

The One True Savior is TRUMP.

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

That's up to the democratically elected representatives of each state to decide, or the voters of each state to decide. Why do you hate democracy?

 

Between your tiresome superiority complex and this now "Vance wannabe" stance, I much prefer the former, if for nothing else it doesn't reek of self-righteousness, mate.

(btw, what's going on at Sky News lately, I kinda miss their jovial, cherubic front...)

  • Like 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

You sound like a 5-year-old in the corner hugging himself and comforting himself by saying that monsters arent real.

I'm going off the data.

 

You are relying on low quality talking points sent by your internet friends.

 

Nationwide, only 45% of voters are male. Why is that?

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
5 hours ago, theblether said:

The Harris agenda to pay for transitioning prisoners - 

 

Commit a crime and get the taxpayer to pay for your transition costs? 

 

It reminds me of a news story on this forum years ago. A ladyboy stole 300,000 baht from a German tourist in Pattaya. By the time the police found the ladyboy they were being wheeled out of an operating in Bangkok, sex change operation. The ladyboy knew they would be caught as the hotel had a copy of their ID. 

 

 

Prisons under Trump offered gender-affirming care, NYT reports

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...