I just want to say all you people who claim there's a cover-up with Epstein, you're one step away from the Area 51 zealots.

 

Smh.

Just now, Cameroni said:

I just want to say all you people who claim there's a cover-up with Epstein, you're one step away from the Area 51 zealots.

 

Smh.

You are so sure there isn't, yet nothing to show otherwise..🤔

One of the most cynical and arse-covering cover-ups in history with just moutains of freshly-laid steaming brown stuff present at every turn... just to protect an elite that needs bringing to justice.

1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

Any older than that, and they really don't have much to talk about. 

Quite right, she would far surpass his intellectual level, and some!!

30 minutes ago, JackGats said:

Some people have a non conspiracy, sobering angle on this, quote: "... the whole “Epstein” case was completely blown out of proportion. The media moguls exacerbated the situation well above the severity of the actual situation. For six years, it seemed the normies went on and on about how this case was the “eureka-struck-gold” moment that would’ve revealed the dark underbelly of the world’s most insurmountable protégés. Ironically, all that hype and clamouring to “release the files” or the “flight list” turned into absolutely nothing. No flight logs, no files documenting this and that. Just politicians and conspiracy theorists zigzagging for years that all accumulated into nothingness. Don’t know why it took six years for two government agencies to come out and say that it was pretty much a hoax, but now we have our answer. Don’t know why Pam Bondi claimed she had it “right on her desk”, when there was literally nothing in that time."

 

The Epstein case = a nothingburger.

"Don’t know why Pam Bondi claimed she had it “right on her desk”, when there was literally nothing in that time."

 

Could the explanation simply be that she's a clown in a clown show, handpicked by the chief clown himself?

45 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

"Don’t know why Pam Bondi claimed she had it “right on her desk”, when there was literally nothing in that time."

 

Could the explanation simply be that she's a clown in a clown show, handpicked by the chief clown himself?

That's the most likely explanation! 

The criminal adjudicated sex offender has at least 25 sexual misconduct allegations to his name — including one from a 1994 party at Epstein’s Manhattan residence.
 

In a functioning world, the reason for the cover-up should be obvious.

Sexual misconduct allegations - Wikipedia
 

32 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

The criminal adjudicated sex offender has at least 25 sexual misconduct allegations to his name — including one from a 1994 party at Epstein’s Manhattan residence.
 

In a functioning world, the reason for the cover-up should be obvious.

Sexual misconduct allegations - Wikipedia
 

A sex fiend and convicted criminal. A life of crime and cover-ups. I give you.......the POTUS!

2 hours ago, transam said:

You are so sure there isn't, yet nothing to show otherwise..🤔

 

You mean there's nothing that shows a cover-up has taken place.

 

Suicide, yes, clearly. 

 

Missing minute, yes, on all videos made there.

 

The claim she has a list? No, she said she will review the file, which is on her desk, not the contact list.

 

The  conspiracy theorists are losing the plot, clearly.

2 hours ago, BLMFem said:

"Don’t know why Pam Bondi claimed she had it “right on her desk”, when there was literally nothing in that time."

 

Could the explanation simply be that she's a clown in a clown show, handpicked by the chief clown himself?

 

No, the explanation is her statement was taken out of context. I saw the conversation, she was simply saying the matter is on her desk, the file relating to Epstein was what she meant. Not the client list.

 

Very simple explanation.

 

 

44 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

No, the explanation is her statement was taken out of context. I saw the conversation, she was simply saying the matter is on her desk, the file relating to Epstein was what she meant. Not the client list.

 

Very simple explanation.

 

 

More cr#p from you. It's clear you never saw or heard the conversation at all.  Unless, of course, you're being purposely untruthful.  Here's a link to the video in which John Roberts asks Bondi this:

John Roberts: "You may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients. Will that really happen??

Pam Bondi:     "It's sitting on my desk right now to review. That's been a directive by President Trump."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bondi-says-epstein-client-list-sitting-my-desk-right-now-reviewing-jfk-mlk-files

 

18 minutes ago, annotator said:

More cr#p from you. It's clear you never saw or heard the conversation at all.  Unless, of course, you're being purposely untruthful.  Here's a link to the video in which John Roberts asks Bondi this:

John Roberts: "You may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients. Will that really happen??

Pam Bondi:     "It's sitting on my desk right now to review. That's been a directive by President Trump."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bondi-says-epstein-client-list-sitting-my-desk-right-now-reviewing-jfk-mlk-files

 

 

More conspiracy nonsense from you, anyone looking at the conversation can see she clearly meant the matter itself is on her desk, the Epstein file, not any list.

 

She herself clarified it:

 

Bondi addressed the concerns in a Cabinet meeting Tuesday, clarifying that when she was asked earlier this year about the client list, her response was about the entire file,

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/doj-says-no-jeffrey-epstein-183511583.html?guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAL4tJs9SlDgUte145aARJ1RygRiZKro_SAGjbcUEfKB9GP_BoRynPHZIXSiVjCYcs23g4TrXoSG75VgOjLqk7qsNtbiY7dQA6hPJnSaFlpClD2l53__6OMAHpsDBD9X5PTDus0P34Dxfeo17MnOSiYOjj0GUAZ3Jy7w73ueNN_PW

 

Only the most zealot of tin-foil hat wearing conspiracy nutters would not accept a sensible clarification. 

 

All this conspiracy nonsense about Epstein is total nuttery.

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

 

More conspiracy nonsense from you, anyone looking at the conversation can see she clearly meant the matter itself is on her desk, the Epstein file, not any list.

 

She herself clarified it:

 

Bondi addressed the concerns in a Cabinet meeting Tuesday, clarifying that when she was asked earlier this year about the client list, her response was about the entire file,

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/doj-says-no-jeffrey-epstein-183511583.html?guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAL4tJs9SlDgUte145aARJ1RygRiZKro_SAGjbcUEfKB9GP_BoRynPHZIXSiVjCYcs23g4TrXoSG75VgOjLqk7qsNtbiY7dQA6hPJnSaFlpClD2l53__6OMAHpsDBD9X5PTDus0P34Dxfeo17MnOSiYOjj0GUAZ3Jy7w73ueNN_PW

 

Only the most zealot of tin-foil hat wearing conspiracy nutters would not accept a sensible clarification. 

 

All this conspiracy nonsense about Epstein is total nuttery.

Oh, She herself "clarified it." Well, then it must be true if she "clarified it." Or maybe you are just incredibly naive.

 

5 minutes ago, annotator said:

She herself "clarified it." Well, then it must be true if she "clarified it."

 

Errr, yeah, after all she knows what she meant, and her clarification makes perfect sense.

 

5 minutes ago, annotator said:

Or maybe you are just incredibly naive.

 

Or maybe you're a bit of a nutter who believe in a conspiracy theory without any shred of evidence?

13 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Errr, yeah, after all she knows what she meant, and her clarification makes perfect sense.

 

 

Or maybe you're a bit of a nutter who believe in a conspiracy theory without any shred of evidence?

Sure. Because people never lie to extract themselves from a difficult situation. You've got to be kidding.

4 hours ago, Cameroni said:

I just want to say all you people who claim there's a cover-up with Epstein, you're one step away from the Area 51 zealots.

 

Smh.

The government is notoriously poor at keeping secrets, and information is leaked all the time; yet, anything related to Epstein is seen as a cover-up. 

3 hours ago, LosLobo said:

The criminal adjudicated sex offender has at least 25 sexual misconduct allegations to his name — including one from a 1994 party at Epstein’s Manhattan residence.
 

In a functioning world, the reason for the cover-up should be obvious.

Sexual misconduct allegations - Wikipedia
 

I'm surprised it's only 25 and not several hundreds, what with Today's sexual abuse hyperinflationary language.

 

The whole Epstein case rested on the testimony of 17-year old gold-digger and compulsive liar, whose humongous lies ended up antagonizing even the zealots who had fielded her as an accuser. Had Epstein's case involved anything else than sex, it would have been thrown out of court on the first day. 

On 7/8/2025 at 9:17 AM, frank83628 said:

Time to let go of the Trump involvement, widely published that he banned Epstein from his buildings. The Dems and media have thrown Litterally everything at Trump over the years, if there was any ties they'd have been front page headlines by now.

There are plenty of photographs, video footage and it's associated audio clips which all indicate that Mr Trump, if not an actual participant in Epstein's activities was certainly party to them.

 

The anouncement that there is no "client list", after Ms Bondi had previously stated that it was "on her desk" is about as credible as the conclusion that Epstein committed suicide in his cell whilston remand.

 

The whole business stinks to high heaven.

9 hours ago, JAG said:

There are plenty of photographs, video footage and it's associated audio clips which all indicate that Mr Trump, if not an actual participant in Epstein's activities was certainly party to them.

 

The anouncement that there is no "client list", after Ms Bondi had previously stated that it was "on her desk" is about as credible as the conclusion that Epstein committed suicide in his cell whilston remand.

 

The whole business stinks to high heaven.

That is simply not true.

If Trump was implicate in anything to do with Epstein, we'd have see every detail by now.

You seem to be oblivious to the witch hunt aimed at Trump since 2016.

 

The whole 'there is no list' i am not buying at all. There has to be records of desription.

16 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

That is simply not true.

If Trump was implicate in anything to do with Epstein, we'd have see every detail by now.

You seem to be oblivious to the witch hunt aimed at Trump since 2016.

 

The whole 'there is no list' i am not buying at all. There has to be records of desription.

The photographs, video and audio are in the public domain.

 

Ms Bondi's sudden about turn and denying the existence of a list, after she had previously stated that it was on her desk is, let me suggest, strange at least.

 

Epstein's death in custody was never thoroughly investigated - it was rapidly, very rapidly, and very conveniently, ruled to be suicide.

 

You are right in that there has been intense interest in Trumps apparent involvement with the Epstein affair, interest matched by a superlative effort to keep him out of any "frame". That effort is only partly successful, the evidence remains in the public domain and without a North Korean style approach to news management it will continue to provoke questions. Questions which will continue to be "blanked"; Ms Bond's remarkable  declaration that there is "no list" is the latest manifestation of this.

3 minutes ago, JAG said:

The photographs, video and audio are in the public domain.

 

Ms Bondi's sudden about turn and denying the existence of a list, after she had previously stated that it was on her desk is, let me suggest, strange at least.

 

Epstein's death in custody was never thoroughly investigated - it was rapidly, very rapidly, ruled to be suicide.

 

You are right in that there has been intense interest in Trumps apparent involvement with the Epstein affair, interest matched by a superlative effort to keep him out of any "frame". M&s Bond's remarkable  declaration that there is "no list" is the latest manifestation of this.

You should give up with the Trump/Epstein thing, its about as real as the Russia collusion hoax, (paid for by Clinton and the DNC)

There is a photo of Trump standing with Epstein, that is it. I dont dispute people knowing Epstein, the rich move in the same circles

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

You should give up with the Trump/Epstein thing, its about as real as the Russia collusion hoax, (paid for by Clinton and the DNC)

There is a photo of Trump standing with Epstein, that is it. I dont dispute people knowing Epstein, the rich move in the same circles

Then, PROOF, please, not your Russian affiliation guessing, PROOF........🤔

47 minutes ago, JAG said:

Ms Bondi's sudden about turn and denying the existence of a list, after she had previously stated that it was on her desk is,

 

You are just misinterpreting what she said. She meant the file was on her desk, the Epstein file. Not the "client list". She clarified that.

 

Just another instance of journalists causing confusion, and you fell for it.

31 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

You are just misinterpreting what she said. She meant the file was on her desk, the Epstein file. Not the "client list". She clarified that.

 

Just another instance of journalists causing confusion, and you fell for it.

Yep, they misquote ship all the time and the morons here just lap it up because it feeds their derangement

6 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Yep, they misquote ship all the time and the morons here just lap it up because it feeds their derangement

 

You gotta laugh, all these Epstein conspiracy nuts would just love a good sex and cover up story, but nothing to be had.

 

So funny.

Can someone remind me who was POTUS at the time Epstein committed suicide, and 62 seconds of CCTV recordings got missed?

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

There is a photo of Trump standing with Epstein, that is it.

 

Photos don't talk, so where did the audio recordings come from?

6 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

Photos don't talk, so where did the audio recordings come from?

What recordings? Post them up.

 

I 've only heard him in one clip saying  Jeffery 'liked them young' i believe this was in during an interview, but i could be wrong.

 

When making these claims, dont forget about the obsessive witch hunt against Trump since 2016 by Democrats & media, all those years they never tied him to Epstein or anything was leaked, just 1 photo

 

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

Yep, they misquote ship all the time and the morons here just lap it upmiSse it feeds their derangement

Misquote? Here's a link to the video from Fox News which I already posted once.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bondi-says-epstein-client-list-sitting-my-desk-right-now-reviewing-jfk-mlk-files

 

34 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

What recordings? Post them up.

 

Would be difficult to post a minute recording that is missing, don't you think? And I'm sure you are aware, since there was a topic in that regard in this forum.

 

But here it is from the world news

 

https://www.newsweek.com/jeffrey-epstein-video-questions-2095859

 

Missing Minute in Jeffrey Epstein Video Raises Questions