Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

BREAKING - WSJ: Trump’s Name All Over The Epstein Files

Featured Replies

  • Replies 443
  • Views 10.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Not trying to defend the President, but why wouldn't high profile people mix with a financier? I see nothing abnormal about seeing pictures of Mr Clinton and  MrTrump mixing with a financier. 

  • Chomper Higgot
    Chomper Higgot

    What’s interesting about this is the number of Republicans who defied Trump to back this subpoena.   Then we have the problem of people in Trump’s administration refusing to obey Congression

  • HappyExpat57
    HappyExpat57

    They were "mixing" on Epstein's private island where human trafficking/child exploitation was explicitly being engaged in. There is too much physical evidence supporting this, and NONE of it was creat

Posted Images

6 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

You all seem to back judges that defy Trump.... how about now.?

Screenshot_20250724_141032_Facebook.jpg

You never hear'd of curruption Frank ? Money can buy silence know what i mean.

  • Popular Post

Question for poster @KhaoHom:
 

Trump would slap a defamation suit on a stale ham sandwich.
So why not the 25 women and girls who accused him of sex crimes?
Why did so many of those cases vanish — dropped, sealed, or quietly settled?

If he’s innocent, what exactly is he hiding from?

  • Popular Post

@Harrisfan As I wrote, "his more dense followers".

 

All you have is "Biden Biden, Biden", rather than tackling why Trump isn't releasing the information promised. It's actually moronic.

 

Did any Democrat promise to reveal any details of the baby eating paedophiles? They did not. Trump did.

 

So let's keep this thread about Trump and you can start one about Biden.

1 minute ago, SMIAI said:

@Harrisfan As I wrote, "his more dense followers".

 

All you have is "Biden Biden, Biden", rather than tackling why Trump isn't releasing the information promised. It's actually moronic.

 

Did any Democrat promise to reveal any details of the baby eating paedophiles? They did not. Trump did.

 

So let's keep this thread about Trump and you can start one about Biden.

Ok then. If you say so.

  • Popular Post
3 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

There is nothing of substance to discuss. It's all old news.

Then why are you posting about it?

37 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

You all seem to back judges that defy Trump.... how about now.?

Screenshot_20250724_141032_Facebook.jpg

Another example of MAGA/Russian lame confusion tactics.

 

The US Attorney who granted the infamous sweetheart deal was Acosta, a Republican. He was later nominated labor secretary by..... Trump! 🤣🤣🤣

 

https://www.npr.org/2019/07/09/739903033/trump-defends-labor-secretary-acosta-over-epstein-plea-deal

 

I am confused about all of your comments here that actually see Trump as a pedifile and think he is guilty of participating in Epsteins child trafficking. EVery photo of the 2 together, every comment of Trump being his buddy, Every news release about his name in papers, have failed to show Trump saw or was with Epstein past 1990s. The child that made a case against Epstein was in 2005. She would only just been born in the 1990s. There is no reports on how long Epstein used children for trafficking also. All investigations began after 2005. Nothing to show Trump was with him ever during the time Epstein was doing this that got him arrested. But there are many reports about Prince Andrew with Epstein during that time.

@thesetat You need to learn to read AND comprehend. That is from a witness stating that she saw Trump with the 12 and 13 year old girls. The witness was in the employ of Epstein from 1990 until 2000.

 

 

 

4 minutes ago, thesetat said:

You mean he witnessed something in your comment. Does not mean he participated. 

 

What???????

 

First line......

 

9. I personally witnessed the one occasion where Mr. Trump forced the Plaintiff and a 12-year-old
female named Maria perform oral sex on Mr. Trump and witnessed his physical abuse of both minors
when they finished the act.

Strange how the OP calls this "Breaking News". 

 

Biden had full access to the Epstein files. If there was anything that would have caused serious trouble for Trump it would have been released by Biden.  

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/house-subcommittee-votes-8-2-to-subpoena-justice-department-for-epstein-files  

 

even as House Speaker Mike Johnson — caught between demands from Trump and clamoring from his own members for the House to act — was sending lawmakers home a day early for its August recess. The House Committee on Oversight also issued a subpoena Wednesday for Ghislaine Maxwell, a convicted sex offender and girlfriend of the late Epstein, to testify before committee officials in August.

1 minute ago, Smokin Joe said:

Strange how the OP calls this "Breaking News". 

 

Biden had full access to the Epstein files. If there was anything that would have caused serious trouble for Trump it would have been released by Biden.  

 

I suspect there are MANY names from both sides of the aisle which made this a radioactive topic left best to ignore. Unfortunately for 47, he has pissed off too many people in the know and this little atomic bomb is about to explode.

  • Author
7 hours ago, frank83628 said:

Epstein was a financier and wealthy, he will have had normal everyday contact with many rich and wealthy, that isn't the issue, it's those that were involved with the underage girls on the island that people want to know about


In many cases, one in the same. 

11 minutes ago, Smokin Joe said:

Strange how the OP calls this "Breaking News". 

 

Biden had full access to the Epstein files. If there was anything that would have caused serious trouble for Trump it would have been released by Biden.  

You think just the Republicans participated. Wake up and smell the roses!

More nothing burger BS for the anti-Trump haters and MSM to go on and on and on about. Will all the anti-Trump nutters here commit to dropping their hatred and just let it go if this all pans out to be BS and goes away??  I will commit that if Trump is charged and found guilty of sex with young teenagers (in a fair trial in a fair State) and he loses his appeal/s if it is a Dem AG in a Dem State, that I will no longer support Trump. Your previous insanity over Russia and Change Room Rapes and Tax Fraud and all the other BS was all political hit pieces and you all fell for it hook line and sinker and burgers. 

  • Popular Post
1 minute ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

More nothing burger BS for the anti-Trump haters and MSM to go on and on and on about. Will all the anti-Trump nutters here commit to dropping their hatred and just let it go if this all pans out to be BS and goes away??  I will commit that if Trump is charged and found guilty of sex with young teenagers (in a fair trial in a fair State) and he loses his appeal/s if it is a Dem AG in a Dem State, that I will no longer support Trump. Your previous insanity over Russia and Change Room Rapes and Tax Fraud and all the other BS was all political hit pieces and you all fell for it hook line and sinker and burgers. 

Donald Trump Might Have Just Made the Epstein Story a Hundred Times Worse

 

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/07/trump-suing-wsj-epstein-story-backfire-bigly.html

15 minutes ago, Smokin Joe said:

Strange how the OP calls this "Breaking News". 

 

Biden had full access to the Epstein files. If there was anything that would have caused serious trouble for Trump it would have been released by Biden.  

The Epstein file was MAGA stuff. It was part of the usual B.S MAGA propaganda about the dand claiming how Trump would disclose it if elected. It was largely ignored as such by the Dems.

 

Of course, Dems are now taking advantage of it. That's the usual political game.

 

It's too funny to see MAGAs having a taste of their own medecine, and on top of it from other MAGAs!  :laugh:

  • Popular Post
8 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

More nothing burger BS for the anti-Trump haters and MSM to go on and on and on about. Will all the anti-Trump nutters here commit to dropping their hatred and just let it go if this all pans out to be BS and goes away??  I will commit that if Trump is charged and found guilty of sex with young teenagers (in a fair trial in a fair State) and he loses his appeal/s if it is a Dem AG in a Dem State, that I will no longer support Trump. Your previous insanity over Russia and Change Room Rapes and Tax Fraud and all the other BS was all political hit pieces and you all fell for it hook line and sinker and burgers. 

You think your anti-Trump members are nutters is out of place, perhaps it is just they have good memories and can remember Trump's lies and B.S., together with the loss of the USA friends by the idiot....

I would suggest it is you that is the nutter........🤨

  • Popular Post
6 minutes ago, sharot724 said:

Donald Trump Might Have Just Made the Epstein Story a Hundred Times Worse

 

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/07/trump-suing-wsj-epstein-story-backfire-bigly.html

The lawsuit is a mistake. It will only amplify this phenomenon. 

 

Trump is getting bitten by his own lies! Priceless! :laugh:

10 minutes ago, sharot724 said:

Donald Trump Might Have Just Made the Epstein Story a Hundred Times Worse

 

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/07/trump-suing-wsj-epstein-story-backfire-bigly.html

If you think it is all fraud then suggest you listen/watch the congressional hearing on the charity funds which instead went to Eric Trump land development projects.  IRS documentation used too.  Ivanka eventually claimed 5th amendment and the I blv DJT paid a 2 million dollar fine as he was let off by his buddies.

55 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Trump is a prooven liar though Thesasat or do you den'y that.

 Biden, Harris, Johnston, stamer, Blair, Bush, Obama.... all truth tellers right

  • Popular Post
1 minute ago, Real Name Hidden said:

This is a issue only because Trump handled it so poorly.

Not only.

This is an issue because Trump and MAGAs have been touting the client list and other Deep State conspiracy theories for years.

14 minutes ago, sharot724 said:

Donald Trump Might Have Just Made the Epstein Story a Hundred Times Worse

 

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/07/trump-suing-wsj-epstein-story-backfire-bigly.html

Trump is not one to back down from a fight - nor is WSJ. But what WSY and its analysis mates are forgetting is that they attacked Trump while he was POTUS. Not only will Trump have the full resources of the White House behind him, the libel charges could progress to charges of sedition.  It is one thing to slander and libel a brash billionaire you dont politically like - it is another thing altogether to do that to the sitting POTUS. 

 

Me thinks WSJ has bitten off more than they can shew if they fight this - Trump has already directed his Admin and AG to release all the files - and many of them are already on record. WSJ better have a very good and reliable source, of the settlement they will have to pay will make what CBS paid (and did with all the layoffs) pale into insignificance. 

 

There is only one rule when you try to assassinate a Ki*** - DONT MISS !!  

Trump Just Lost One of His Most Famous Followers: the QAnon Shaman | Jacob Chansley referred to Donald Trump as a “piece of s***.”

 

 

 

  • Popular Post
11 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

Trump is not one to back down from a fight - nor is WSJ. But what WSY and its analysis mates are forgetting is that they attacked Trump while he was POTUS. Not only will Trump have the full resources of the White House behind him, the libel charges could progress to charges of sedition.  It is one thing to slander and libel a brash billionaire you dont politically like - it is another thing altogether to do that to the sitting POTUS. 

 

Me thinks WSJ has bitten off more than they can shew if they fight this - Trump has already directed his Admin and AG to release all the files - and many of them are already on record. WSJ better have a very good and reliable source, of the settlement they will have to pay will make what CBS paid (and did with all the layoffs) pale into insignificance. 

 

There is only one rule when you try to assassinate a Ki*** - DONT MISS !!  

You forget that the WSJ merely described the document. They did not make any claim about its veracity. And there is also no evidence of malign intent.

 

The article was checked by experienced lawyers in order to avoid being caught for libel.

 

You mention the CBS  case, it wasn't the same law used, and Murdoch doesn't need an approval for a merger. It's clearly explained in the article.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.