Jump to content

Thai Premier Yingluck reassures Al Jazeera amnesty bill off the table


Recommended Posts

Posted

Thai Premier reassures Al Jazeera amnesty bill off the table

BANGKOK, 4 December (NNT) – Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra has reassured Qatari broadcaster Al Jazeera that the controversial amnesty bill is now off the table.


The Thai Premier, during her interview with Al Jazeera, said the Thai government was no longer attempting to pass the amnesty bill that ignited conflict in the country. The amnesty bill, if passed, would pardon many people involved in corruption including former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra.

Miss Yingluck also told the reporter that the government was in control of the situation. Despite seizures of state offices, the government would carry on its operation as usual, adding that it is a “must” for the government to serve its people.

She went on to say that the government respected the right to freedom of expression as long as it is under the law and democracy, while suggesting that the government would be open to talks and negotiations to find a solution to the prolonged political gridlock.

Lastly, She said the 2010 crackdown had hurt the country enough already and she did not want to see any more deaths or injuries. She also asserted that, as the Prime Minister and Defense Minister of the country, the military should obey her command.

nntlogo.jpg
-- NNT 2013-12-04 footer_n.gif

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

It may be off the table for now but it hasn't been torn up yet.

It's just been hidden away to be produced at a later date.

She was asked that exact point - that it could be brought back after 180 days, or something like that. She said it wouldn't.

However, the main reason I came to this thread was to comment about how badly she conveyed her answers to the interviewer. A lot of the time the interviewer had a deep frown on her face as if she was trying to understand what YS was saying.

YS was just babbling, almost panicking, and saying the usual words without forming many coherent sentences. It really was a poor performance. Even worse than her brother.

I just found the video. Watch it if you have the mental fortitude. The amnesty bill is discussed is at about 11:30:

Wow this is just horrible. Out of all the decent and qualified people in this nation they picked Yingluck to represent and lead the country. Just unbelievable

  • Like 1
Posted

It may be off the table for now but it hasn't been torn up yet.

It's just been hidden away to be produced at a later date.

She was asked that exact point - that it could be brought back after 180 days, or something like that. She said it wouldn't.

However, the main reason I came to this thread was to comment about how badly she conveyed her answers to the interviewer. A lot of the time the interviewer had a deep frown on her face as if she was trying to understand what YS was saying.

YS was just babbling, almost panicking, and saying the usual words without forming many coherent sentences. It really was a poor performance. Even worse than her brother.

I just found the video. Watch it if you have the mental fortitude. The amnesty bill is discussed is at about 11:30:

Wow this is just horrible. Out of all the decent and qualified people in this nation they picked Yingluck to represent and lead the country. Just unbelievable

I struggled to hold on after "My Pressure"

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

It may be off the table for now but it hasn't been torn up yet.

It's just been hidden away to be produced at a later date.

She was asked that exact point - that it could be brought back after 180 days, or something like that. She said it wouldn't.

However, the main reason I came to this thread was to comment about how badly she conveyed her answers to the interviewer. A lot of the time the interviewer had a deep frown on her face as if she was trying to understand what YS was saying.

YS was just babbling, almost panicking, and saying the usual words without forming many coherent sentences. It really was a poor performance. Even worse than her brother.

I just found the video. Watch it if you have the mental fortitude. The amnesty bill is discussed is at about 11:30:

Wow this is just horrible. Out of all the decent and qualified people in this nation they picked Yingluck to represent and lead the country. Just unbelievable

It is even horrible without sound. Those facial expressions....blink.png

It is really very sad indeed that this incompetent liar is the leader of Thailand.

Edited by Nickymaster
Posted

Those shares belong to me, not my brother

I run this country

I don't listen to my brother

I have nothing to do with the rice pledging scheme

This amnesty bill has nothing to do with my brother

I have done nothing wrong

The amnesty bill will not be re-tabled

Given that sequence of statements, why would you give the last any more credibility than the others?

  • Like 2
Posted

Listen to the interview. Thai Premier Yingluck unable to answer the questions related to the political situation, however she able to answers quite well about the economy situation.

Posted

That video was painful to watch. If the PM is not comfortable using English in an interview why not just use a translator? It almost sounded like she ran her answer in Thai through google translate....

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Whether it's Thaksin or Yingluck, they both have the same strategy when talking to the foreign press. Regardless of the questions being asked, they will always give the same self promoting answers.

Edited by Nickymaster
Posted

However, the main reason I came to this thread was to comment about how badly she conveyed her answers to the interviewer. A lot of the time the interviewer had a deep frown on her face as if she was trying to understand what YS was saying.

YS was just babbling, almost panicking, and saying the usual words without forming many coherent sentences. It really was a poor performance. Even worse than her brother.

Quite.

And you have to keep reminding yourself, this is a person who successfully completed a Master's Degree completely in English!

Just how exactly did that happen, when her spoken English suggests she would severely struggle doing a GCSE in English, let alone a Master's? I mean, how?!

She majored in English for her bachelors degree at Chiang Mai U and did an MBA at the Uni of Kentucky but still a very poor show. Thaksin was already wealthy then and took care of her education. So all could have been bought and paid for at CMU and Kentucky is one of those state colleges that needs foreign MBA students to subsidise the in-state bachelors degree students.

It would be unfair to say she sounds like a bar girl but there are a lot of mamasans who sounds at least as good as that, if not better.

Posted

That video was painful to watch. If the PM is not comfortable using English in an interview why not just use a translator? It almost sounded like she ran her answer in Thai through google translate....

I think you are being rather unfair to Google Translate.

Previously the kept the foreign media away from her, except a few carefully scripted interviews with jouranlists who agreed to submit questions in advance. Now that her back is up against the wall there is no choice but to put her in spotlight. The effects are painful, probably for her too.

Posted

However, the main reason I came to this thread was to comment about how badly she conveyed her answers to the interviewer. A lot of the time the interviewer had a deep frown on her face as if she was trying to understand what YS was saying.

YS was just babbling, almost panicking, and saying the usual words without forming many coherent sentences. It really was a poor performance. Even worse than her brother.

Quite.

And you have to keep reminding yourself, this is a person who successfully completed a Master's Degree completely in English!

Just how exactly did that happen, when her spoken English suggests she would severely struggle doing a GCSE in English, let alone a Master's? I mean, how?!

Did she buy her masters Degree in Bangkok?

Posted

It may be off the table for now but it hasn't been torn up yet.

It's just been hidden away to be produced at a later date.

She was asked that exact point - that it could be brought back after 180 days, or something like that. She said it wouldn't.

However, the main reason I came to this thread was to comment about how badly she conveyed her answers to the interviewer. A lot of the time the interviewer had a deep frown on her face as if she was trying to understand what YS was saying.

YS was just babbling, almost panicking, and saying the usual words without forming many coherent sentences. It really was a poor performance. Even worse than her brother.

I just found the video. Watch it if you have the mental fortitude. The amnesty bill is discussed is at about 11:30:

Yes, it was a particularly cringeworthy interview and I suspect, in retrospect her advisors would have rather she had not done it, as it will weaken her international standing still further as a premier not in control of herself, let alone the country. She seemed unable to grasp the meaning of the questions, perhaps just one or two words within them, and then went off on a meaningless babble that had to involve mention of "democracy", "election", "the people" in each (non-)answer. That the interviewer mentioned Yingluk's speech in Mongolia caught her out big-time, as it showed she really has no idea of the content of speeches scripted for her and if she wasn't the PM of a country who claims to have a masters degree from a US university, you'd have to feel sorry for the woman. As it was, one is left thinking, "surely Thailand can do better than this for a premier"? Then again, how many times did we think the same when Dubya opened his mouth and spoke? coffee1.gifblink.png

Maybe she thought that it will be a very short Premiership, as big brother would return to take over! Not that I feel sorry for her. I would go so far as to say that MP's in her own party are glad he is not back. You have to wonder the reasons of such a failure by PTP with a majority to have their own way. If Thaksin was really in control or if others in the party were just happy to feed from the trough?

Posted

However, the main reason I came to this thread was to comment about how badly she conveyed her answers to the interviewer. A lot of the time the interviewer had a deep frown on her face as if she was trying to understand what YS was saying.

YS was just babbling, almost panicking, and saying the usual words without forming many coherent sentences. It really was a poor performance. Even worse than her brother.

Quite.

And you have to keep reminding yourself, this is a person who successfully completed a Master's Degree completely in English!

Just how exactly did that happen, when her spoken English suggests she would severely struggle doing a GCSE in English, let alone a Master's? I mean, how?!

Did she buy her masters Degree in Bangkok?

University of Kentucky as a matter of fact.

Posted

Note to Jonathan Head, BBC correspondent and fellow Old Alleynian :

Mate, watch this and learn. thumbsup.gif

LOL, JH must have spent all of 2 minutes preparing for his farcical Beeb interview on tax payers money?

Posted

Note to Jonathan Head, BBC correspondent and fellow Old Alleynian :

Mate, watch this and learn. thumbsup.gif

LOL, JH must have spent all of 2 minutes preparing for his farcical Beeb interview on tax payers money?

He probably thought any more than that was a total was of time, knowing he's be speaking English whilst she would reply in gibberish. coffee1.gif

Posted

However, the main reason I came to this thread was to comment about how badly she conveyed her answers to the interviewer. A lot of the time the interviewer had a deep frown on her face as if she was trying to understand what YS was saying.

YS was just babbling, almost panicking, and saying the usual words without forming many coherent sentences. It really was a poor performance. Even worse than her brother.

Quite.

And you have to keep reminding yourself, this is a person who successfully completed a Master's Degree completely in English!

Just how exactly did that happen, when her spoken English suggests she would severely struggle doing a GCSE in English, let alone a Master's? I mean, how?!

How long ago did she complete her Master's? To be fair, language skills deteriorate very quickly if not in continual use. I have several Thai friends who completed degrees in English speaking countries. Once back in Thailand they never bothered to keep their English ability up.

I was fluent in German, when I lived and worked in Germany. I was fluent in French when I lived and worked in Paris. Now after many years of rarely using I'd probably sound like Yingluck's English to them!

I doubt she'd answer the questions differently in Thai. Superficial, denials. and repeating what she's been told to say.

  • Like 2
Posted

However, the main reason I came to this thread was to comment about how badly she conveyed her answers to the interviewer. A lot of the time the interviewer had a deep frown on her face as if she was trying to understand what YS was saying.

YS was just babbling, almost panicking, and saying the usual words without forming many coherent sentences. It really was a poor performance. Even worse than her brother.

She speaks like a bargirl. No wonder the interviewer struggled, despite asking her questions really S-L-O-W-L-Y.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...