Jump to content

Newspaper editorials across U.S. rebuke Trump for attacks on media


Recommended Posts

Posted

Newspaper editorials across U.S. rebuke Trump for attacks on media

By Alex Dobuzinskis

 

2018-08-16T041729Z_2_LYNXMPEE7F04L_RTROPTP_4_USA-MEDIA-TRUMP.JPG

The Boston Globe's logo is seen on the newspaper's building in Boston, Massachusetts June 15, 2009. REUTERS/Brian Snyder/Files

 

(Reuters) - More than 300 U.S. newspapers have pledged to run editorials on Thursday defending freedom of the press in response to President Donald Trump calling some media organizations enemies of the American people.

 

The Boston Globe organized the editorial push, which was joined by the New York Times and a number of smaller newspapers, including some in states that Trump won during the 2016 presidential election.

 

The Boston Globe editorial board, in a piece posted online on Wednesday, accused Trump of carrying out a "sustained assault on the free press."

 

"The greatness of America is dependent on the role of a free press to speak the truth to the powerful," the Globe piece said. "To label the press 'the enemy of the people' is as un-American as it is dangerous to the civic compact we have shared for more than two centuries."

 

Trump, in treating the media at times like an opposition party, has responded to unflattering reports as "fake news."

 

For instance, in February 2017 the president tweeted that "The FAKE NEWS media (failing @nytimes, @NBCNews, @ABC, @CBS, @CNN) is not my enemy, it is the enemy of the American people!"

 

A representative for the White House could not immediately be reached for comment on the editorials.

 

At conservative website Townhall.com, an opinion piece from Tom Tradup accused newspapers taking part in the editorial push of "collusion."

 

"Unlike the mastodons at The Boston Globe, I would not presume to tell anyone else what to think or what to do," Tradup wrote. "But as for me - and I suspect many others - I won't be putting any coins in any newspaper box August 16th."

 

The publication of the editorials follows similar criticism of Trump by a number of public figures over the issue of press freedom.

 

In January, U.S. Senator Jeff Flake, a Republican from Arizona, said Trump had embraced the despotic language of former Soviet dictator Josef Stalin.

 

The Kansas City Star, in Missouri which Trump won in the 2016 presidential election, in its editorial also compared Trump's comments on the media to Stalin's silencing of his critics. And it took issue with the term "fake news."

 

"Everywhere in the country, any matter that an official doesn't want to talk about or that a reader doesn't want to hear about is 'fake news' now," the Star said in its editorial, which ran online on Wednesday.

 

(Reporting by Alex Dobuzinskis; Editing by Michael Perry)

 
reuters_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-08-16
Posted

Trump does enough crazy stuff for the media, if they were honest, to have plenty of fun at his expense. They really do not need to cut bits from what he says just to change the meaning. Saw a good vid recently on fact checking the fact checkers. Really interesting to see what is reported (and verified by fact checkers) that proves to be totally false.

Thankfully YouTube has not (as yet) deleted all of the non-Left sites.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

11 minutes ago, phantomfiddler said:

Seems to me it,s the other way round ! No other president in American history has had to deal with the vitriol thrown by the media at an elected leader.

 

But, has it been deserved?  I cannot imagine any of of the modern presidents daring to do what is shown in the attached photos.  (Sorry, there's a computer mistake on one attachment.)

 

 

Borowitz-Trump-Russians.jpg

image.png

Trump making fun disabled.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Donald needs the distraction things are heating up with his pal Paul and amerosa and what terrifies him is the silent muller lurking approaching ever closer to exposing him for what he is why else would he be screaming and lying all the time?

  • Like 1
  • Heart-broken 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

How long does america want to toil with this senile clown?
Out of his mouth come only hate, lies and insults.
It is time that this weak head is to deposed out of office.

  • Like 1
  • Heart-broken 1
Posted

Of course they attacked Trump.  That's their job these days.  Doesn't matter if there is good news, they will twist it.  On the day that the remains of the Korean soldiers were returned to Hawaii, Fox News covered it live, CNN and MSNBC gave it scant attention. This was something that should have been positive news and covered with dignity but it was not by the anti-Trump media.  Every time one turns on Rachel Maddow, she's on a diatribe against something Trump has done or said. Watch an hour of CNN and one would think the world is coming to an end because Trump is President.  There is a reason viewership has dropped, people don't need negativity 24 hours a day.  The print news is much the same. I picked up a weekday copy of the Los Angeles Times the other day.  What used to be a decent daily with various sections of news, sports, business, and entertainment, is now like a throw away paper.  Of course the reasons for this are many but the print media is struggling to survive and they have succeeded in loosing half their readership because they are no longer balanced, just as the cable news media.  It is unfortunate because true journalism seems to be dying a painful death.  The sad part is that it would appear most people these days get their news off the internet.  It's impossible to count the number of basically internet news channels that have popped up over the years. One can read snippet after snippet of "news" from sources which have no history of balanced journalism. The snippets are passed on through Facebook and other social media with scant attention as to whether the items are true or not.  Is it any wonder the Russians could just place snippets in Facebook or other blogs and that people might believe what they read?  It's just a sign of the times and people loosing faith in government and news agencies.  The fact that there has to be fact checking services says it all. People can't trust the news outlets as they now have their own agenda.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Becker said:

So you're an NPR guy then? And if not then what media do you have any use for?

Guardian, Foreign Policy mag before they put the paywall up, ..........that's about it.

  • Haha 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, RocketDog said:

All you said is self-evidently true.

As an American I am deeply troubled with the turn my country has taken in the last 20 years. We have lost our way.

 

Trump is not the direct cause of the current miserable  condition my country is in, but he is instead a symptom of the woeful negligence of Americans themselves.

 

Half of the qualified voters here don't perform their due diligence on democracy by voting.

 

The health of democracy depends on intelligent and informed voters. That is where we Americans have failed ourselves, our beloved country, and future generations of Americans.

 

We are paying a heart-wrenching price for our self-centered sloth and self-indulgence.

 

It will not be easy to rid ourselves of this megalomaniacal tyrant, but the destruction of society and government that he promotes can possibly serve as a wakeup call to my fellow citizens.

 

I can only hope so. Without such a Renaissance of thought and purpose I fear that we have set ourselves on a course that is irreversible.

 

I don't recuse myself of obligations to return my society and government to a sane and sustainable course, but I relish the time I spend in Thailand to maintain some semblance of personal hope.

 

For all the America bashers out there, I won't feign insult or denial. The situation is what it is, and that's  a discouraging  mess.

 

I will say though that my country has historically been a beacon of truth and freedom for many decades and it is in the best interest of all the world for us to get our shit together.  We need understanding and support from all the world's people; not for our government, but for our people who must right the sad ship of state.

 

Some version of the pathetic despot we face now could be coming to your country soon, if he/she hasn't already.

 

Constant vigilance is the duty of all freedom loving peoples everywhere.

Having elected an amoral moron surely does not improve the reputation of your country.

 

However, the way your constitution and your institutions provides a rather efficient safeguard deserves respect.

  • Like 1
  • Heart-broken 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
9 hours ago, helpisgood said:

 

 

But, has it been deserved?  I cannot imagine any of of the modern presidents daring to do what is shown in the attached photos.  (Sorry, there's a computer mistake on one attachment.)

 

 

Borowitz-Trump-Russians.jpg

 

 

 

Note worthy that this photo was taken right before the three of them went into the Oval Office, with only RT reporters, no US or other press.  It was at that little gathering that DT passed on classified info to his Russian pals.

I also recall a nasty exchange between Lavrov (the one on the left) and the US press as the door was closing.

This may be yet another first for the Great Orange One: first US president to pass officially classified information to  a known adversary.  Perhaps he'll one-up that for being the first US president put on trial for treason.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Haha 2
Posted
10 hours ago, phantomfiddler said:

Seems to me it,s the other way round ! No other president in American history has had to deal with the vitriol thrown by the media at an elected leader.

Says a white man who has no memory of what Obama went through.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, pegman said:

Guardian, Foreign Policy mag before they put the paywall up, ..........that's about it.

So only the (UK) Guardian then, which makes you a Guardianista according to Wikipedia (learn something every day). Pretty limited range of material on which to form opinions I would say.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, pegman said:

The question was what media I have any use for and not what media I read or watch. I read and watch everything from Beitbart AND CNBC to MSNBC and MotherJones. Being retired, curious and wanting to being informed of what's happening in the world I spend a lot of time taking in all kinds of media.  My quest always is for no media to form my opinions for me but to come up with my own. My American friends left and right don't really understand  why I would do that

Just to add to my earlier post there are 3 world affairs columnists I usually do agree with and those are  Eric Margolis, Gwynne Dyer and Stephan Walt.

Sadly your friends are not interested in becoming informed , they simply seek bias confirmation. Politics both in the UK and especially the USA seems to be getting ever more polarised , ignorant sheep blindly rushing towards disaster !

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...