Jump to content

Elderly expats given lifeline regarding mandatory insurance requirement for Non-Immigrant “O-A” visas


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 235
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The embassies are NOT going to get into the business of certifying insurance documents issued in a home country.

Good Question...and why do they continue to punish OA Visa holders and leave O Visa holders unscathed ? Extensions now are absurd...because my OA obtained in 2017 needs insurance(s) and the guy in the

Image composite for reference only   Thailand’s Cabinet on Tuesday approved new rules that will help people aged over 70 purchase health insurance as part of the application for a Non-Immigr

Posted Images

<<the applicant must submit additional documents with their O-A application such as the letter of refusal, plus securities, deposits>>
not sure what this implies, anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some articles on this new proposal by "The Cabinet" mention...

 

deputy spokeswoman for the government, said it would apply to all holders of the one-year, non-immigrant visa (NIV).

 

 

There are other mentions of COVID-specifc insurance.

 

And the ability to self insure, proof of a bank account with 3,000,000 baht.

 

 

Early days, nothing approved/gazetted, so a bit confusing, but this does seem to be about more than just the option for OA's to source their insurance from companies putside of Thailand.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, ubonjoe said:

See number 8 here in Thai

 

Thanks. 

 

Yes, that is certainly quite a bit more clear than various news reports.

 

Interesting that there is a distinction, in the new guidelines, which covers the permission to stay (along with the initiall visa issuance,a nd the option to self-insure).

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, ubonjoe said:

There is nothing in the summary of the cabinet meeting about any thing other than OA visas.

See number 8 here in Thai (I used google translate on it) https://www.thaigov.go.th/news/contents/details/42740

As said it is not final yet. It could be months before anything appears in a immigration order or a change of the requirements at a embassy or official consulate.

 

 

So the report about everyone on all visa extensions requiring 100K insurance in the future is essentially wrong? Only OA is mentioned in the link you provided (at point 8). 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

With an O-A visa you get the benefit of not needing to leave the country every 3 months. Only logical that insurance requirements for 1 year are higher than for a max 3 months stay with an O or B.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...