Jump to content

Thailand’s anti-graft body ordered to reveal its findings on DPM Prawit’s wristwatch scandal


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

The Central Administrative Court has ordered Thailand’s anti-graft watchdog, the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC), to reveal its findings from an investigation into the expensive wristwatches seen being worn in public by Deputy Prime Minister Prawit Wongsuwan

in order to confirm what we all know already. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RichardColeman said:

They should publish ALL the wealth and assets of every government official, how they got it, is it above their declared work income, and have they paid the right tax on it. Oh, and how many designer cars have passed through their hands !

 

Just the last 8 months will do 

 

It's amazing the they exempted themselves from any such scrutiny 

 

I'd like to see a full audit of all the emergency budgets they have passed in the last 8 months - every satang fully accounted for 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

The court ruled that, the disclosure of the findings about this case, including witness testimonies and Gen Prawit’s own testimonies, will demonstrate the transparency and accountability of the NACC and will enhance public trust and confidence in the agency

????????????????????????

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

The Central Administrative Court has ordered Thailand’s anti-graft watchdog, the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC), to reveal its findings from an investigation into the expensive wristwatches seen being worn in public by Deputy Prime Minister Prawit Wongsuwan.

Just because 3 of the 8 members of the investigation thought there was a case to be answered. doesn't mean he might be guilty, maybe some envelopes got lost in the post?

All the watches were owned by an old dead school associate 

The NACC declined,, to make public the full details of the findings.

What could possibly be wrong?

 

 

 

 

  •  
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this as a distraction from people commenting on The Plastic Bag  scandal, the aircraft use scandal? 

Throw them an old case already resolved and they will be happy?

I bet there are some report writers working feverishly to get something together that does not smack of being opaque

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...