Jump to content

Pence leads Republicans calling for national abortion ban post Roe v. Wade ruling: ‘We must not rest’


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

The abortions are not carried out on medical advice , as you suggested .

Yes they are and a link was already provided to prove that. All abortions which happens to be just 1% in that time frame 21 weeks up which is what you were referring to, are provided because of medical reasons

 

https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/fact-sheet/abortions-later-in-pregnancy/

Edited by coolcarer
Posted
4 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

You dont seem to be aware what an "elective abortion" is :

 

 

"An abortion is referred to as an elective or voluntary abortion when it is performed at the request of the woman for non-medical reasons."

 

   The figures and graphs I provided state "elective abortion"  which means not at the advice of a medical person but voluntarily  elected by the woman .

 

  

You have yet to provide evidence of late term abortions carried out without medical advice.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Can we just talk about normal relationships and pregnancies , rather than abnormal relationships like rape and incest ?

Reality inconvenient to an absolutist stance? Deal with the complexities, they are dictating public policy for all contingencies. Yes, rape, incest, medical complications, amniotic testing, chorionic village sampling …

  • Like 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You have yet to provide evidence of late term abortions carried out without medical advice.

I have given the laws and states where its legal to carry out abortions at that stage .Could you stop trying to turn this into a back and forth squabble , I have no other into that I can keep giving to you 

  • Like 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, Wrwest said:

Reality inconvenient to an absolutist stance? Deal with the complexities, they are dictating public policy for all contingencies. Yes, rape, incest, medical complications, amniotic testing, chorionic village sampling …

Can you provide some evidence to show that abortions  are completely banned , even when there's a medical complication ?

  • Like 1
Posted

The BBC has reported that all States will still allow abortion on medical grounds (if the Mothers life is in danger) 

 

 

"All states allow abortion to save the life of the mother, while some will also allow exceptions to their ban for cases of rape or incest."

 

 

 

 

OklahomaExceptions: to save the life of the mother

Map showing the location of Oklahoma

A trigger law that passed in 2021 has gone into effect, banning abortion at any stage of pregnancy. There are no exceptions for rape or incest. There is an exception to protect the life of the mother. Providing an abortion otherwise would be punishable with prison time.

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-61804777

18 hours ago

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

Not just a clump of cells. You are misinformed.

I am not misinformed; besides, I talk about early abortion that is when about 2/3s happen. 

 

Christians and other moralists are uninformed thinking they can decide for others. How about you decide for yourself and others decide for them. This does not concern you. You force your family and friend and follow your stupid code. Others will do the same for theirs.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Wrwest said:

Reality inconvenient to an absolutist stance? Deal with the complexities, they are dictating public policy for all contingencies. Yes, rape, incest, medical complications, amniotic testing, chorionic village sampling …

Correct, thanks to the linked article from the BBC provided earlier, its clear that no thought to the wider issues of medical advice abortions or the wishes of parents has been taken into account by the majority of states who are imposing a ban or already have one in place with the exception of medical advice to save the life of the mother.

 

What about the severe disabilities that can be detected such as anencephaly, being just one example, half of the babies born with anencephaly will not survive birth and the other half die within hours or days. Imagine a mother having to carry that for months knowing it will die and worse what if it was an accidental pregnancy in the first place. Only 4 states, Alabama, Georgia, Iowa and South Carolina have made an exception to this.

 

Then of course the rapes and incest. only Mississippi, Utah, Wyoming, Georgia, Iowa and South Carolina will consider this with restrictions for authenticating the rape.

 

As mentioned many times, this will affect the poor more than any another other demographic. 49% being below the poverty level.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
18 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

It doesnt really make much difference , you are still depriving a living being of a life , whether you do that after 9 weeks , 20 weeks or 30 weeks, doesn't really make much difference . To are just ending that life a few weeks earlier

There was a great analogy I read the other day that clarifies things in this endless and fruitless debate. It's a variation on the "Trolley Problem".

 

You're in a house that has caught on fire. The house is a Center for Reproductive Health. You wake up in a panic and rush to get out. On your way out, you quickly open a door because you hear someone screaming in terror and inside there are two chairs. One has a child of 1 year old on it. The other has a big container with 1,000 in-vitro fertilization eggs that have already been impregnated with sperm and the cooling systems to maintain them. You can only carry one and what is left will burn. What do you do?

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, JCauto said:

There was a great analogy I read the other day that clarifies things in this endless and fruitless debate. It's a variation on the "Trolley Problem".

 

You're in a house that has caught on fire. The house is a Center for Reproductive Health. You wake up in a panic and rush to get out. On your way out, you quickly open a door because you hear someone screaming in terror and inside there are two chairs. One has a child of 1 year old on it. The other has a big container with 1,000 in-vitro fertilization eggs that have already been impregnated with sperm and the cooling systems to maintain them. You can only carry one and what is left will burn. What do you do?

By the way, the person who wrote the original analogy observed that when he would post this on fora, he practically NEVER gets a response because everyone knows what the answer is including the so-called "right-to-lifers", hence they simply won't answer. Prove us wrong Mac!

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, JCauto said:

No, because when you make laws, they apply to everyone UNLESS those exceptions are made. And the laws that are being passed by the anti-abortion states allow for no exceptions. 

There's quite a simple way for you to understand this. Imagine yourself as a woman, and consider that situation where some guy is insisting that you have to do something with your body, or even that you're being forced to maintain a pregnancy for 8 months or so with no options, and that you cannot make any medical decisions without that person, whether their rapist or abuser or relative, having an equal say in the matter. You okay with that?

Imagining the plight of others, while seemingly a simple matter, comes with one of two predisposed thoughts, ‘empathy’ or ‘vindictive cruelty’

 

There are a number of examples through this thread.

 

 

 

 

Posted
11 hours ago, robblok said:

I am not misinformed; besides, I talk about early abortion that is when about 2/3s happen. 

 

Christians and other moralists are uninformed thinking they can decide for others. How about you decide for yourself and others decide for them. This does not concern you. You force your family and friend and follow your stupid code. Others will do the same for theirs.

I think that the unborn baby should be the one to make the choice .

Here is a 15 weeks old "no brain and a clump of cells " and who should decide whether a unborn Child of a similar age should either have a life or not ?

 

 http://stillbirthday.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/aemon.jpg

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

I think that the unborn baby should be the one to make the choice .

Here is a 15 weeks old "no brain and a clump of cells " and who should decide whether a unborn Child of a similar age should either have a life or not ?

 

 http://stillbirthday.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/aemon.jpg

 

 

 

That is batsh!t crazy. How is the unborn baby able to make the choice? Is there an app for that? 

Edited by GarryP
  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, GarryP said:

That is batsh!t crazy. How is the unborn baby able to make the choice? Is there an app for that? 

You would have to wait until the Child is born and then reaches an age when they can make that choice .

  Ask the Child when they reach 18 years old, whether they want to either live or die 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
52 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

I think that the unborn baby should be the one to make the choice .

Here is a 15 weeks old "no brain and a clump of cells " and who should decide whether a unborn Child of a similar age should either have a life or not ?

 

 http://stillbirthday.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/aemon.jpg

 

 

 

This is nothing to do with the post your responding to,  "I talk about early abortion that is when about 2/3s happen"

 

The majority of abortions are within 9 weeks. Got it now!

 

For clarity once again:

9 out of 10 abortions are carried out within 12 weeks not the same as the link to your image shows. In addition, two thirds of those were carried out before 9 weeks.

 

Do you deliberately get a kick out of posting images or links of unborn babies and fetus's? 

Edited by Bkk Brian
Posted
11 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

You would have to wait until the Child is born and then reaches an age when they can make that choice .

  Ask the Child when they reach 18 years old, whether they want to either live or die 

So you are forcing a woman to have a child she does not want. Are you going to look after all those unwanted children? Birth control methods don't always work, so why not force all men to have reversible vasectomies so women would not get pregnant? Men are equally responsible for conception so if you punish a woman for getting pregnant by forcing her to have a child, you must also force a punishment on the man. What would that punishment be? Put him in solitary confinement for 9 months? Castration? Come on, you have got to be fair.          

  • Like 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

This is nothing to do with the post your responding to,  "I talk about early abortion that is when about 2/3s happen"

 

The majority of abortions are within 9 weeks. Got it now!

 

For clarity once again:

9 out of 10 abortions are carried out within 12 weeks not the same as the link to your image shows. In addition, two thirds of those were carried out before 9 weeks.

 

Do you deliberately get a kick out of posting images or links of unborn babies and fetus's? 

Well yeas a 12 week old unborn Child looks slightly different , my point was that they still have human features and aren't just cells . Here is a 12 week old premature born baby , the usual age for abortions 

 

babynoah-672x372-1.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Well yeas a 12 week old unborn Child looks slightly different , my point was that they still have human features and aren't just cells . Here is a 12 week old premature born baby , the usual age for abortions 

 

babynoah-672x372-1.jpg

Confirmed you get a kick out of inappropriate images that has nothing to do with the OP and ignore the post content you respond to

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Confirmed you get a kick out of inappropriate images that has nothing to do with the OP and ignore the post content you respond to

I replied to your post in which you stated the regular age of abortions is 12 weeks old and you seemed to be agreeing with roblocks previous post that they were just "no brains and clumps of cells" at that age .

   I posted the relevant photo to show that theres a bit more to them than a clump of cells  

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

I replied to your post in which you stated the regular age of abortions is 12 weeks old and you seemed to be agreeing with roblocks previous post that they were just "no brains and clumps of cells" at that age .

   I posted the relevant photo to show that theres a bit more to them than a clump of cells  

I did not say that though did I. "The majority of abortions are within 9 weeks and under" and I was clearly referring you to roblocks post which said:

 

13 hours ago, robblok said:

I am not misinformed; besides, I talk about early abortion that is when about 2/3s happen. 

Until you at the least acknowledge when you are wrong and move on then all you do is deflection, post an image, pathetic. Man up a little and get some credibility

Edited by Bkk Brian
Posted
18 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

I did not say that though did I. "The majority of abortions are within 9 weeks and under" and I was clearly referring you to roblocks post which said:

 

Until you at the least acknowledge when you are wrong and move on then all you do is deflection, post an image, pathetic. Man up a little and get some credibility

It really doesn't matter when the majority of abortions are carried out , there isnt much different to the end result , whether the procedure would be carried out today or in one months time .

   If an unborn child was aborted at 9/12/15/20/35 weeks , the end result is still the same . That unborn childs life would end before it was born , whether that unborn childs life would end after a certain amount of weeks is irrelevant 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 178

      Trump's 'huge lie' shows 'he’s taking everyone for an idiot': analysis

    2. 5

      Renew Thai DL on METV (Now that Embassy no longer gives POR)

    3. 0

      U.S. Senators Introduce Legislation to Counter UN Actions Against Israel

    4. 0

      Essex Police Under Scrutiny for Domestic Abuse Failures Amid Investigation of Allison Pears

    5. 0

      Accusations of Hypocrisy as Private Jet use Doubles Travelling to Cop29

    6. 0

      Council Tax Bills to Increase by Over £100 in April Amid Cap Freeze

    7. 0

      Elon Musk Embraces New Role as the ‘George Soros of the Right’ Alongside Trump

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...