Nearly half of Americans think Trump should suspend 2024 campaign after indictment: poll

[placeholder]

45 minutes ago, 2009 said:

Lol.

I am not even trying to prove he interfered by arresting Trump.

Where have I even attempted to show evidence that he did that??

 

(Though the timing is convenient, that's for sure)

 

What I am saying (multiple times already) is that it is unethical (suspicious even) for him to say that he'd do everything in his legal power to stop Trump becoming president again.

 

I don't think it's his job to do that. He should leave that to the voters because it's supposed to be a democracy.

 

Do you agree or disagree with that? Placeholder dodged this question. Will you?

 

I did not dodge your question at all. I just didn't give you the answer you wanted. In fact, when you did ask me what I thought it meant, I gave you the answer, namely, elections. Stop making things up. 

I also pointed out that your interpretation is dodgy. What does "under the legitimate efforts of our Constitution" mean? He didn't use the word "legal", he used legitimate which sets a far stricter standard, even though, to be fair, I'm not entirely sure what "under the legitimate efforts of our Constitution" even means. But it certainly doesn't smack of using the Justice Dept. against him. Throughout his career, Biden has not earned a reputation for being a wordsmith.

[placeholder]

1 hour ago, candide said:

So, as noticed by placeholder, he did  ot say he will interfere. That's only your interpretation. However, he clearly made a reference to the Constitution. Does the Constitution allow a president to interfere?

Anyway, a biased interpretation of a not very clear statement does not prove anything. How exactly did he interefere and what is the evidence? You have nothing.

What's really funny about this is that Trump and Barr did attempt to coerce justice dept officials to go after Trump's enemies. Trump even attempted to push Zelensky into investigating his chief political opponent, Joe Biden.

Ya think the same people who are trying to twist Biden's words into some sort of plot, were concerned by the actions of the previous administration?

[candide]

41 minutes ago, 2009 said:

Lol.

I am not even trying to prove he interfered by arresting Trump.

Where have I even attempted to show evidence that he did that??

 

(Though the timing is convenient, that's for sure)

 

What I am saying (multiple times already) is that it is unethical (suspicious even) for him to say that he'd do everything in his legal power to stop Trump becoming president again.

 

I don't think it's his job to do that. He should leave that to the voters because it's supposed to be a democracy.

 

Do you agree or disagree with that? Placeholder dodged this question. Will you?

 

I had time to check what was exactly said and when, and here is my reply.

 

A look at the context and at what he exactly said is quite instructing, and it's not unethical as you suggest.

Here's a quote of what he said, which includes what he said just before:

 

(BIDEN) "And so, they’re very concerned that we are still the open democracy we’ve been and that we have rules and the institutions matter.  And that’s the context in which I think that they’re looking at: Are we back to a place where we are going to accept decisions made by the Court, by the Congress, by the government, et cetera? 

Q    So the entire genesis of that G7 conversation was tied to your predecessor, who is about to launch another campaign.  So how do you reassure them, if that is the reason for their questioning, that the former President will not return or that his political movement, which is still very strong, will not —

THE PRESIDENT:  Oh, yeah?  (Laughs.)  

Q    — once again take power in the United States?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, we just have to demonstrate that he will not take power by — if we — if he does run.  I’m making sure he, under legitimate efforts of our Constitution, does not become the next President again.

Q    Thanks."

 

The subject discussed was:

"that we have rules and the institutions matter."

"Are we back to a place where we are going to accept decisions made by the Court, by the Congress, by the government, et cetera?"

Is that an unethical perspective?

 

It is also relevant to note that he did not use "we" as "me" or the government, or the Democrats, but as the USA

"we are still the open democracy"

"Are we back to a place"

 

Then he talked about Trump returning to power because he was asked about it, because the G7 countries were worried (according to the journalist asking the question).

"I’m making sure he, under legitimate efforts of our Constitution, does not become the next President again."

He does not suggest he will interfere in anything. There no precision about what he meant. It could well be, for example, to beat him at the next elections. It's not unethical, and it is not in contradiction with voters voting to choose the next President, as you claim.

 

In brief, you have nothing.

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2022/11/09/remarks-by-president-biden-in-press-conference-8/

 

Other readings:

 

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-trump-indictment-biden-666348749991

https://www.newsweek.com/biden-trump-indictment-stop-power-1792426

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/04/bidens-2022-remarks-not-related-to-trump-indictment-contrary-to-online-posts/

 

 

 

[Paradise Pete]

20 hours ago, 2009 said:

So, Trump runs for president, they indict him, and half the people think he should stop running. ????

Sad day for democracy. ????

I wonder if those people are democrats, by any chance?

 

"I like people who weren't indicted."

 

[thaibeachlovers]

18 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

I agree that he shouldn't run again, but it has nothing to do with the indictments.  I would rather see a younger and more palatable person in the White House.

 

Really seems that fear is a big motivating factor amongst Democrats these days.  They realized that they dodged a bullet in 2020, thanks to Covid. Absent the pandemic, Trump would have been re-elected easily.  

Agree 100%. IMO the continual attacks using legal means are because they really, really fear him winning again, even more so given that he would likely take revenge  on them.

 

My sensible side hopes he doesn't stand or loses the primaries, so a better GOP candidate can win, but my mischievous side hopes he wins for the "entertainment" that would follow.

[Tug]

1 minute ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Agree 100%. IMO the continual attacks using legal means are because they really, really fear him winning again, even more so given that he would likely take revenge  on them.

 

My sensible side hopes he doesn't stand or loses the primaries, so a better GOP candidate can win, but my mischievous side hopes he wins for the "entertainment" that would follow.

Ahhh nooo it’s because he’s a criminal that’s why he has these problems no more no less the main reason it draws so much attention is he was once potus and inherited lots of money from da da if those two reason were absent no body would make a fuss the bilko artist would just be tryed convinced and jailed no muss no fuss lock him up!!

[mushroomdave]

20 hours ago, Tug said:

He won’t withdraw its his most lucrative grift and a easy way to get the attention he craves

Hillary says he will get all the attention he wants in prison 55555.  

They say since last Tuesday you can still hear the party over at Hillary's going on with chants of "LOCK HIM UP, LOCK HIM UP, LOCK HIM UP!!!!"

 ????????????????????????????????

[2baht]

21 hours ago, Social Media said:

A recent ABC News/Ipsos poll found that 48% of Americans think Trump should suspend his presidential campaign following the indictment

What's wrong with the other 52%???

[Skeptic7]

He should be suspended. 

[thaibeachlovers]

1 hour ago, 2baht said:

What's wrong with the other 52%???

Nothing.

[2baht]

1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Nothing.

 

[placeholder]

18 hours ago, Kwaibill said:

Reading comprehension is not a known MAGA strong point.

Maybe that's why they seem to rely so much on videos.

[bendejo]

The word was he was offered $25 million when he became a former president to do a new Apprentice, so I'd guess that offer is still out there.  But he's stumbled upon  money machine and could make that in a month or two via fundraising.

I guess when he hears they are creating VIP cells at Allenwood Low he may finally see there is no light at the end of his tunnel.

 

 

[RichardColeman]

I am right wing, but that does not say I would not listen to the argument from someone on the left. A good debate is good for society.

 

But heavens, trying to find a pro-Trump story or anti-biden one on this site is like looking for a virgin in soi 6. At least even it up a bit.

[Jingthing]

1 minute ago, RichardColeman said:

I am right wing, but that does not say I would not listen to the argument from someone on the left. A good debate is good for society.

 

But heavens, trying to find a pro-Trump story or anti-biden one on this site is like looking for a virgin in soi 6. At least even it up a bit.

You're acting like they are equivalent. Just two politicians  NO!

[Eric Loh]

4 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Agree 100%. IMO the continual attacks using legal means are because they really, really fear him winning again, even more so given that he would likely take revenge  on them.

 

My sensible side hopes he doesn't stand or loses the primaries, so a better GOP candidate can win, but my mischievous side hopes he wins for the "entertainment" that would follow.

Don’t let the hopeful side of you takeover your sensible side mate. Grasped the reality; Trump’s performative entertainment is only appealing to the 25%. The rest is sick and tire of his corrupt antics and give him an embarrassing send off in 2024. He simply don’t stand a chance and the Dems don’t even need Biden to give him a good old fashion beat down. 

[Bkk Brian]

12 minutes ago, RichardColeman said:

I am right wing, but that does not say I would not listen to the argument from someone on the left. A good debate is good for society.

 

But heavens, trying to find a pro-Trump story or anti-biden one on this site is like looking for a virgin in soi 6. At least even it up a bit.

Think of the bright side, 36% want Trump to run....lol & this OP is from Fox News, not right wing enough for you?

[placeholder]

11 minutes ago, RichardColeman said:

I am right wing, but that does not say I would not listen to the argument from someone on the left. A good debate is good for society.

 

But heavens, trying to find a pro-Trump story or anti-biden one on this site is like looking for a virgin in soi 6. At least even it up a bit.

Really

Here are some stories from the first page that should delight most supporters of Trump:

 

https://aseannow.com/topic/1289905-economy-is-in-the-tank-banks-are-reeling-inflation-is-sky-high-and-theres-more-biden-isnt-telling-you/page/7/#comment-18016763

 

https://aseannow.com/topic/1292058-the-post-office-fired-me-for-honoring-the-lords-day-supreme-court-must-make-this-right/#comment-18016764

 

https://aseannow.com/topic/1292063-florida-house-passes-6-week-abortion-ban-expected-to-be-signed-by-governor/#comment-18016855

 

https://aseannow.com/topic/1291837-as-president-biden-considers-2024-run-americans-weigh-in-on-whether-he-should/

 

https://aseannow.com/topic/1291961-donald-trump-is-suing-michael-cohen-for-500-million-in-damages-for-allegedly-breaching-his-contract-as-trumps-former-personal-attorney/#comment-18016469

 

[Grusa]

23 hours ago, placeholder said:

With that in prospect, he may actually be running away.

Jesus got to where he is by getting nailed to a cross. A winning strategy for Trump, maybe?

[placeholder]

Just now, Grusa said:

Jesus got to where he is by getting nailed to a cross. A winning strategy for Trump, maybe?

The thing is, Jesus was innocent.

[Grusa]

Just now, placeholder said:

The thing is, Jesus was innocent.

Did it matter? Did it make a difference? Same - Same for Donald.

[snowgard]

On 4/13/2023 at 9:17 AM, 2009 said:

So, Trump runs for president, they indict him, and half the people think he should stop running. ????

 

Sad day for democracy. ????

 

I wonder if those people are democrats, by any chance?

No, this people are realistic and want to see the outcome of all what the Liar-Baron done!!! Him is a criminal and the biggest shame for the USA!!!

SAD DAY FOR DEMOCRACY???  Really? For Trump it not give democracy!!! It gives only his words & rules or in reality "HIS LIES"!!! And new ways for filling his bankaccounts with the help of stupid Maga-Gaga-Crackheads.

[earlinclaifornia]

39 minutes ago, RichardColeman said:

I am right wing, but that does not say I would not listen to the argument from someone on the left. A good debate is good for society.

 

But heavens, trying to find a pro-Trump story or anti-biden one on this site is like looking for a virgin in soi 6. At least even it up a bit.

If your' needing a right wing fix just type in the following, as not one nice thing has ever been written about Biden and has only high praise for Trump. 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics

[newnative]

On 4/13/2023 at 1:09 PM, vandeventer said:

Yes, stop for what? You know he will win, just look at the heads of cabbage on the other side. Roll on 2024 Trump is the major player and will win in a landslide!

That's rich.  He lost the popular vote badly in 2016 and did much worse--and, as the incumbent President--in 2020, losing by over 7 million votes.  So much for a 'landslide'.  The majority of voting Americans have never wanted Trump.

[vandeventer]

4 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

If your' needing a right wing fix just type in the following, as not one nice thing has ever been written about Biden and has only high praise for Trump. 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics

Nice thing said about Biden? Why don't you name one good thing he has done right for the American people other than hiding in the cellar.

[newnative]

19 hours ago, Jingthing said:

That's silly.

Democrats that know what's what WANT Trump to be nominated because he's such a LOSER! Easiest to beat by Biden by far. I doubt Biden can beat any other republican they might nominate.

Do you really NOT get this?

   Totally agree.  He lost the popular vote in 2016--so the majority of the voters rejected him then. Loser.   Saved by the cursed Electoral College.  After seeing 4 years of his failed presidency, voters turned hands down and he lost the popular vote even more badly in 2020--by over 7 million votes.  Rejected yet again.  Loser.

    He'll always have his core fanatics no matter what he does and a percentage of die-hard Republicans who will vote for whomever is the party's nominee.  But, I like the Democrat chances with Trump as the Republican nominee because I think large numbers of independents and undecideds, and some Republicans, will choose the Democrat nominee over loser Trump with all his negative baggage--and possibly criminal convictions.   And, always good to have an opponent who's dumb as a rock--hopefully, he will once again strongly urge his supporters to wait until Election Day to vote.  

[Eric Loh]

20 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

Nice thing said about Biden? Why don't you name one good thing he has done right for the American people other than hiding in the cellar.

Well he got rid of the do nothing corrupt 45. The best thing Biden has done right for America. And he did that from the cellar. Too easy. 

[ozimoron]

5 hours ago, RichardColeman said:

I am right wing, but that does not say I would not listen to the argument from someone on the left. A good debate is good for society.

 

But heavens, trying to find a pro-Trump story or anti-biden one on this site is like looking for a virgin in soi 6. At least even it up a bit.

That would involve unfairly weighting favorable stories involving Trump as there  aren't many. There weren't many favorable stories involving Nixon either.

[placeholder]

32 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

Nice thing said about Biden? Why don't you name one good thing he has done right for the American people other than hiding in the cellar.

Typical dishonest question. An honest question would be what has Biden accomplished? But this way, if someone lists what he's done you'll just claim that they're the opposite of good.

Really, "hiding in the cellar"? You still broadcasting the nonsense from the 2020 election? Guess what, Biden is in the White House. I guess they have a cellar. What's your point?

[earlinclaifornia]

53 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

Nice thing said about Biden? Why don't you name one good thing he has done right for the American people other than hiding in the cellar.

I'm not that stupid to imagine you would ever find any facts convincing other than Trump lies which you lap up.