The Duchess of Sussex sent a letter to King Charles expressing concern about unconscious bias in the Royal Family, according to reports.

 

Meghan sent the letter after her appearance with Prince Harry on the Oprah Winfrey Show in March 2021, a source has told The Daily Telegraph.

 

The Daily Telegraph's source claimed the exchange is part of the reason why Meghan is not attending the King's coronation, claiming she feels that she did not receive a satisfactory response to her concerns.

 

https://news.sky.com/story/meghan-wrote-to-king-charles-expressing-concern-about-unconscious-bias-in-the-royal-family-reports-12863044

 

No chance of ever being a queen or even a Princess.

 

Simply stirring to see what dirt can be used.

 

A nasty woman IMHO with a suitable mate for a husband.

3 hours ago, onthedarkside said:

The Daily Telegraph's source claimed the exchange is part of the reason why Meghan is not attending the King's coronation, claiming she feels that she did not receive a satisfactory response to her concerns.

Well, her weak-willed whimp of a hubby is most certainly not standing side by side with her on the issue of attending the Coronation at least. There may well be adverse consequences for him at her hands on account of this wilful act of defiance on his part! 

The temerity of this woman, expressing her opinions to her father-in-law.

 

Off with her head.

Are they so desperate for publicity that she resorts to that?

 

What arrogance!

This second rate actress, that has been around a bit, is really out of her depth, Royalty know it, most of the UK know it, but sadly, she doesn't.

 

She thinks, like most of the USA, that if you have a large amount of dosh in the bank, you are a somebody...............????

 

She should stick to being a USA somebody, it's where she belongs, perhaps get pally wiv Donald, he thinks he's important.....????...

 

 

A reported troll post and several replies have been removed. 

15 minutes ago, transam said:

This second rate actress, that has been around a bit, is really out of her depth, Royalty know it, most of the UK know it, but sadly, she doesn't.

 

She thinks, like most of the USA, that if you have a large amount of dosh in the bank, you are a somebody...............????

 

She should stick to being a USA somebody, it's where she belongs, perhaps get pally wiv Donald, he thinks he's important.....????...

 

 

A few gross generalisations there, Transam. 

 

Megan's been about a bit? Has she also had an adulterous affair with a married man while she, too, was married, as is the case with her future step-mother in law?

17 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

A few gross generalisations there, Transam. 

 

Megan's been about a bit? Has she also had an adulterous affair with a married man while she, too, was married, as is the case with her future step-mother in law?

And you haven't....................................................????

6 minutes ago, transam said:

And you haven't....................................................????

A little off topic deflection there. Why should a US citizen married to a UK citizen still to US affairs? Or anybody for that matter. Pretty weak tea you're drinking there.

14 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

A little off topic deflection there. Why should a US citizen married to a UK citizen still to US affairs? Or anybody for that matter. Pretty weak tea you're drinking there.

Coming from an Aussy, that's a bit rich......................................????

2 hours ago, RuamRudy said:

A few gross generalisations there, Transam. 

 

Megan's been about a bit? Has she also had an adulterous affair with a married man while she, too, was married, as is the case with her future step-mother in law?

55555555555

It's like non royal people don't play away to read some of the posts on here.

With a 50% divorce rate it's probably normal these days.

45 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

55555555555

It's like non royal people don't play away to read some of the posts on here.

With a 50% divorce rate it's probably normal these days.

But most of us are not meant to be some moral figurehead, head of the church of England, about to be anointed by holy snake oil from the church of the sepulchre at great public expense etc. 

13 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

But most of us are not meant to be some moral figurehead, head of the church of England, about to be anointed by holy snake oil from the church of the sepulchre at great public expense etc. 

The Crown are net contributors to the economy. The public will not be out of pocket.

 

You knew that anyway. You just wanted to stir, I guess.

2 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

The Crown are net contributors to the economy. The public will not be out of pocket.

 

You knew that anyway. You just wanted to stir, I guess.

I think you missed the point

Troll post removed.  

 

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are, without a doubt, the most interesting, colorful and honorable members of the Royal Family.  Without them, the entire family is about as interesting as milk toast.  It is a great loss to the family that Meghan won't be there, but being the dutiful mother that she is, and considering the unwillingness of the Crown to provide proper protection for her and the children , she has made the decision to safely stay in the US with her children.

 

She wrote the letter to Charles AFTER she had publicly accused the royal family of racism.

Is it my imagination, or are the Sussexes becoming irrelevant. I am seeing and hearing less and less of them, which is a very good thing.

 Looking forward to gauging the British public's thoughts on Harry by the volume of booo's wherever he appears during his Coronation visit.

On 4/22/2023 at 2:32 PM, billd766 said:

No chance of ever being a queen or even a Princess.

 

Simply stirring to see what dirt can be used.

 

A nasty woman IMHO with a suitable mate for a husband.

I wonder if Harry was as bothered about his looks when he was born?

Did she write it in green ink?

Why would King Charles bother to reply to this little chancer?

 

To provide Markle with more material for a book or Netflix series? So she can take the reply onto a late night talkshow? No, the best way to deal with a narcissist is to ignore them and hope they go away - forever.

Forget about "unconscious bias": there is plenty of bias among the semi conscious members of family that got fortune and fame due to accident of birth

Reckon there's a 90% chance,  that Harry will get Booed. ( hope so ) at king Charles's coronation.  

 

 

8 minutes ago, quake said:

Reckon there's a 90% chance,  that Harry will get Booed. ( hope so ) at king Charles's coronation.  

 

 

I suspect it will be a very long, very uncomfortable day for him.

 

However, given that his association with the Royal Family is all he has to trade on, he has little choice but to attend. I wonder if he will do the US talk show circuit on his return to the US, to play the victim once again and complain about how everyone was so horrible to him.

 

Or maybe he'll have enough dirt to start slinging for a volume 2 of Waaagh?

 

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

I suspect it will be a very long, very uncomfortable day for him.

 

However, given that his association with the Royal Family is all he has to trade on, he has little choice but to attend. I wonder if he will do the US talk show circuit on his return to the US, to play the victim once again and complain about how everyone was so horrible to him.

 

Or maybe he'll have enough dirt to start slinging for a volume 2 of Waaagh?

 

Yes, Waaagh 2. 

Years ago, the two would be sampling the delights of the Tower of London by now.

 

 

 

 

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

I suspect it will be a very long, very uncomfortable day for him.

 

However, given that his association with the Royal Family is all he has to trade on, he has little choice but to attend. I wonder if he will do the US talk show circuit on his return to the US, to play the victim once again and complain about how everyone was so horrible to him.

 

Or maybe he'll have enough dirt to start slinging for a volume 2 of Waaagh?

 

His association with the royal family? He is literally a member of the royal family! To a person, none of his relatives have anything to offer but that. He is no different to the rest of them in trying to maintain his relevance in a society that is increasingly realising that they are an undemocratic anachronism.

7 hours ago, Credo said:

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are, without a doubt, the most interesting, colorful and honorable members of the Royal Family.  Without them, the entire family is about as interesting as milk toast.  It is a great loss to the family that Meghan won't be there, but being the dutiful mother that she is, and considering the unwillingness of the Crown to provide proper protection for her and the children , she has made the decision to safely stay in the US with her children.

 

A wise decision, as UK boooooooing can get pretty loud.....

2 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

His association with the royal family? He is literally a member of the royal family! To a person, none of his relatives have anything to offer but that. He is no different to the rest of them in trying to maintain his relevance in a society that is increasingly realising that they are an undemocratic anachronism.

Stop sobbing RR, just sit back and think of King James VI of Scotland, who had no ploblem with controlling England......

1 hour ago, Emster23 said:

Forget about "unconscious bias": there is plenty of bias among the semi conscious members of family that got fortune and fame due to accident of birth

No accident, mon amie.................????