Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

You can celebrate charges , no one said you couldn't do that (and thus there's no need to ask whether you can or can not do that)

Yet you seem so salty about that . . . the convictions will follow when evidence is presented and seeing a lot of evidence has been publicly available your man is . . . stuffed. 

 

12 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Charges mean absolutely nothing until there's been a conviction in Court .  

 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, TimeMachine said:

There's a new Obama in town. Looks like he's the obvious choice.  Speaks well,  energetic,  shows some great reasoning skills. 

Will he be president? No chance.  But then again,  i thought that about Obama. If Trump is not trustable and Biden not at all capable,  I cant see anybody else except ChatGPT for President. 

There is a STRONG argument about the value of AI taking over. Skynet could be only a few years away!

Posted
Just now, thaibeachlovers said:

After he was elected did he try to do so? Most would recognise that as obvious electioneering BS, IMO.

have u ever watched any trump rallies while he was POTUS...it was not unusaal at all for him to incite the crowds who loved to yell lock her up...and then it was lock hunter biden up which continues to this day...did you ever one time see trump say to crowd stop it? 

 

.before u lock people up u need to name the crime they supposedly committed and then present some real evidence, not deep state conspricary theory, then a grand jury will vote as to whether or not they believe there is probably cause a crime was indeed committed and then issue an indictment and then after all of that it will go to trial which is nearly always tilted favorably toward the defendent...that is why the jury must vote UNANIMOUS to convict...not 51% or a majority....every single juror has to vote guilty or the defendant walks away free...remember the OJ crime?  republicans really need to brush up on the legal system and how it all works and stop screaming witch hunt and lock her up and all that garbage that they have been going on about for years....

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, HappyExpat57 said:

No, that popularity nonsense was recently debunked. That's Fox NOT-news rhetoric. Ya boy'z going DOWN.

The proper lexical if you want to be smart is "populist" (and not popularity).

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted

So him giving a fake weight amount could get him busted for giving false info on a gov't document, right?

More fraud, what?

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

The attempt by the Land Whale with the 55" waist and bigger-than-a-Kardashian tush to look menacing is so ludicrous, it makes Pee Wee Herman look like the Terminator.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...