Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Its not clear at 

They didn't face trails because they all died .

Hitler, Bin Laden and Epstein all died before they could face trial for their alleged crimes .

   How does that relate to Trump being arrested and facing a trial  ?

   They didn't have a trial because they died, rather than them not doing anything wrong 

 

“rather than them not doing anything wrong”

 

I find it quite astonishing, not to mention deeply worrying and disturbing, that someone can say that about Trump, in the face of such an overwhelming amount of evidence.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

“rather than them not doing anything wrong”

 

I find it quite astonishing, not to mention deeply worrying and disturbing, that someone can say that about Trump, in the face of such an overwhelming amount of evidence.

I was saying that about Bin Laden, Hitler and Epstein , its quite clear if you read the whole sentence rather than just taking a few words out the full sentence 

 

 "They didn't have a trial because they died, rather than them not doing anything wrong "

Posted
6 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

I believe you have previously stated that the 91 charges against Trump were bogus because witchhunt.

I think I used the "witchunt" word but not "bogus" (although probably also true in most cases).

 

But feel free to show me this elusive post that I apparently made.

Posted
26 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

I was saying that about Bin Laden, Hitler and Epstein , its quite clear if you read the whole sentence rather than just taking a few words out the full sentence 

 

 "They didn't have a trial because they died, rather than them not doing anything wrong "

Ah, my bad.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, newnative said:

I, myself, adore sarcasm but one does use it at one's risk on this forum.   As you are seeing.   But, kudos for a great post!  Now I shall let you get back to your explaining to Nick.

Could you explain to me what he was trying to say ?

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Could you explain to me what he was trying to say ?

    Umm, he wasn't 'trying' to say something.  He did say something, in an entertaining and intelligent way, using a form of expression called sarcasm.   Google it and it will be the thing you learn for today.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, newnative said:

    Umm, he wasn't 'trying' to say something.  He did say something, in an entertaining and intelligent way, using a form of expression called sarcasm.   Google it and it will be the thing you learn for today.

Oh I see, he wasn't trying to make any point at all . 

*Trump hasn't been found guilty in a Court of law* .

*Some people who have committed crimes died before they went to Court .*

   I was trying to work out what the connection between the two statements was ( And I wont even attempt to work out where the sarcasm is supposed to be)

 

  • Confused 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

I will type slowly so you understand.

 

Sometimes trials are not necessary for history and/or popular opinion to consider someone guilty. To wit:

 

Hitler

Osama Bin Laden

Donald Trump

 

Oh I see , what he was trying to say was that just because Trump hasn't  been found guilty in a Court of law , that doesn't necessarily mean that hes innocent of all charges .

   He should have used people who have avoided justice , rather than those who died before  being taken to Court to face justice .

   It would have been more easier to understand had he used Jimmy Savile as an example, rather than Hitler .

  Actually, it would have been much easier if he would have just said  *just because Trump hasn't  been found guilty in a Court of law , that doesn't necessarily mean that he's innocent of all charges*

   Well done all, we got there in the end

  • Confused 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

We all got there at the beginning. It was just you that struggled.

No you didn't , no one could explain it initially because it didn't make any sense , Seems like he just wanted to say Trumps name and add a few unsavoury characters to the list , lump Trump in with Hitler/Bin Laden and Epstein 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

I was saying that about Bin Laden, Hitler and Epstein , its quite clear if you read the whole sentence rather than just taking a few words out the full sentence 

 

 "They didn't have a trial because they died, rather than them not doing anything wrong "

So, were Trump to die suddenly, then he's fair game? An interesting reversal on the old saying which yields De mortis nihil nisi malum ([Speak} nothing but ill of the dead)

  • Like 1
Posted

Trump posted his "irrefutable proof" that the 2020 Georgia election was stolen.

 

Spoiler: its so weak that not even the most crazy MAGA type will talk about it.

 

After a year of research, they found 36 dubious votes. Not 11,780.

Screenshot_20230831_113531_Chrome.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
On 8/28/2023 at 12:06 PM, thaibeachlovers said:

Substitute biden for Trump and I'll agree with that.

I wish the republicans would bring impeachment charges. The result wouldn't be a good look for MAGA.

  • Like 2
Posted
On 8/28/2023 at 9:42 PM, Danderman123 said:

I will type slowly so you understand.

 

Sometimes trials are not necessary for history and/or popular opinion to consider someone guilty. To wit:

 

Hitler

Osama Bin Laden

Donald Trump

 

How many people's deaths was Trump responsible for then, if you want to lump him in with mass murderers?

What country did he invade?

 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Can you prove it wasn't? I won't ask you if you believe it wasn't, as you obviously believe it wasn't.

60 + court cases proved it wasn't

  • Like 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Perhaps he belongs to the "I hate Trump" cult, which has a number of members that post on here.

You need to get your definition of what a cult is, here is a lady that managed to leave the Trump cult but it cost her 60 days in jail and 36 months probation.

 

Pamela Hemphill pled guilty to demonstrating in a Capitol building. In May 2022, she was sentenced to 60 days in jail and 36 months' probation. In 2023, Trump publicly claimed her sentence was harsh. In response, she tweeted: "I pleaded guilty because I was guilty!" She told reporters: "It's a struggle trying to get away from gaslighting, Trump's narcissism and all the tactics they use... It was scary to leave the cult."

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

How many people's deaths was Trump responsible for then, if you want to lump him in with mass murderers?

What country did he invade?

 

You've got a fairly low standard there:

 

"Vote for Trump. He's not a mass murderer."

  • Haha 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...