Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

No further response is required....

 

The best the above posters can do is continually present dubious claims by sources with documented histories of peddling COVID misinformation, and/or people associated with organizations with documented histories of peddling COVID misinformation.

 

As a result, their claims are and should be judged in that context and the sources recognized for what they have shown themselves to be -- non-credible.

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Eleftheros said:

Yes, it's one of those irregular verbs, isn't it?

 

I post absolute truth as determined by the government
You post things from non-credible sources
He is a purveyor of dangerous misinformation

 

Yes, when there's no arguments left/no legs to stand on, there's always the alphabet and("those irregular verbs"). Don't forget the kitchen sink and left over spaghetti also. Try harder.

Edited by watthong
Posted
5 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

Depends on which experts you rely to dismiss the possibility of alteration of the human genome.

A common sense approach re this matter would be to urgently start studies to find out if any of this DNA got integrated into any human genomes.

My experts don't post on social media. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 10/24/2023 at 2:38 PM, Red Phoenix said:

A new preprint study was issued Thursday last week by McKernan, Rose and others, providing more evidence of COVID-19 vaccine contamination in vials from Ontario, Canada.

The title of the study speaks for itself:

DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events.

https://osf.io/mjc97/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

 

As long as the same unsourced samples are examined, the results will be the same.

 

Meanwhile, vials all over the world are examined, and no DNA is found.

Posted
On 10/25/2023 at 8:04 AM, Red Phoenix said:

@TallGuyJohninBKK - It's tell-tale that you attempt to discredit David Speicher (MSc, PhD, Former Associate Professor, Biology and Health Sciences – Redeemer University) because he is a member of the Scientific and Medical Advisory Committee of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance.

In May 2023 the CCCA published a 21-page report titled

The Building Case Against COVID-19 Vaccination of Students in Canada

< source: https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/23MY3_Case-against-C19-vaccine-requirements.pdf >

 

That's five minutes of my life wasted.

 

These authors miss the point - university students indeed rarely die from Covid, but they do get infected and pass it along to people who die. That's why vaccination is required to stem an epidemic.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

As long as the same unsourced samples are examined, the results will be the same.

Meanwhile, vials all over the world are examined, and no DNA is found.

~

Source please that "Meanwhile, vials all over the world are examined, and no DNA is found."

  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

That's five minutes of my life wasted.

 

These authors miss the point - university students indeed rarely die from Covid, but they do get infected and pass it along to people who die. That's why vaccination is required to stem an epidemic.

~

These authors miss the point???

Danderman123 vs 18 academics of which 13 University professors. 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
On 10/28/2023 at 1:59 PM, Danderman123 said:

That's five minutes of my life wasted.

 

These authors miss the point - university students indeed rarely die from Covid, but they do get infected and pass it along to people who die. That's why vaccination is required to stem an epidemic.

 

Safe and effective? Thought that had been debunked by the jab makers.

 

  • Haha 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

~

These authors miss the point???

Danderman123 vs 18 academics of which 13 University professors. 

 

We all know that argument by authority fails when the quoted authorities ignore basic science.

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

We all know that argument by authority fails when the quoted authorities ignore basic science.

~

Do provide a source with examples where these 18 University professors and academics are 'ignoring basic science'. 

Edited by Red Phoenix
  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

As long as the same unsourced samples are examined, the results will be the same.

Meanwhile, vials all over the world are examined, and no DNA is found.

~

Anxiously waiting for the credible source of that nugget you quoted that 'vials all over the world are examined, and no DNA is found.' 

Deafening silence, because it is obvious that you made that up. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

A post citing a disallowed social media source in violation of our Community Standards has been removed.

 

18. Social media content is acceptable in most forums. However in factual areas such as but not limited to news, current affairs and health topics, social media cannot be used unless it is from a credible news media source or a government agency, and must include a link to the original source.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

False claims recirculate on harmful DNA in Covid-19 vaccines

04 October 2023

 

"Scientists have repeatedly refuted the claim that Covid-19 vaccines can alter a person's genome, but social media posts suggest DNA contamination in the injections could lead to harmful effects such as cancer.

 

This is false; there is no evidence of significant amounts of genetic material in the shots -- and even if there were, experts say they could not alter cells."

 

https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33WW3U6

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
21 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

"Conclusion: These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold."

 

'billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose'

 

To help readers, how much is billions?  To make it easy, do you know how many DNA molecules (base pairs) are in a human cell?  Should be easy to look up... 

 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...