Trump is dominating the primaries. That doesn’t mean he’ll beat Biden

[candide]

8 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

Who's lying... this is what the judge may think... 

I don't know, you presented it as a quote.

A judge may not think "all the crimes". Biden did not lie about not having some documents when asked to give them back, did not obstruct justice etc...

It's very simple. Had Trump just given back all the documents when he was asked to do so, there would have been no trial. That's his own fault.

[Skipalongcassidy]

14 hours ago, candide said:

I don't know, you presented it as a quote.

A judge may not think "all the crimes". Biden did not lie about not having some documents when asked to give them back, did not obstruct justice etc...

It's very simple. Had Trump just given back all the documents when he was asked to do so, there would have been no trial. That's his own fault.

You see... that is where the democrats differ... they think that giving back the documents means that there was no crime committed... however there was still a crime committed.

[Nick Carter icp]

14 hours ago, candide said:

I don't know, you presented it as a quote.

A judge may not think "all the crimes". Biden did not lie about not having some documents when asked to give them back, did not obstruct justice etc...

It's very simple. Had Trump just given back all the documents when he was asked to do so, there would have been no trial. That's his own fault.

 

   Although Trump claims that he did indeed give all the required documents back and we are waiting for the Court case to show who was right 

[candide]

2 minutes ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

You see... that is where the democrats differ... they think that giving back the documents means that there was no crime committed... however there was still a crime committed.

A lame attempt at distorting what I wrote. 😅

[candide]

10 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Although Trump claims that he did indeed give all the required documents back and we are waiting for the Court case to show who was right 

Lol! There are photos of the documents  they found, videos of boxes being moved and testimonies of Trumps employees.

I hope Trump's attempts to delay the trial won't make us wait too long....

Edited February 13 by candide

[Skipalongcassidy]

6 minutes ago, candide said:

A lame attempt at distorting what I wrote. 😅

Not really... that is exactly what you stated... that if trump had given back the stolen documents like joe did than there wouldn't be any crime

[candide]

2 minutes ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

Not really... that is exactly what you stated... that if trump had given back the stolen documents like joe did than there wouldn't be any crime

No. I wrote there would not have been any trial.

[Nick Carter icp]

39 minutes ago, candide said:

Lol! There are photos of the documents  they found, videos of boxes being moved and testimonies of Trumps employees.

I hope Trump's attempts to delay the trial won't make us wait too long....

 

   Oh, I see, its Trumps fault that the trials have been delated ., what a coincidence that the trials are due to be held at the same time as the next election 

[Yellowtail]

6 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

You see... that is where the democrats differ... they think that giving back the documents means that there was no crime committed... however there was still a crime committed.

Gave them back only AFTER he decided to prosecute Trump. 

[Yellowtail]

5 hours ago, candide said:

No. I wrote there would not have been any trial.

Unlike Biden, Trump possessed the documents legally. 

 

Has anyone accused Trump of having been recorded reading classified documents to his ghost writer yet? 

[Chomper Higgot]

5 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Oh, I see, its Trumps fault that the trials have been delated ., what a coincidence that the trials are due to be held at the same time as the next election 

The coincidences is Trump’s bid to become President in order to avoid justice for his actions.

 

 

[Yellowtail]

13 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The coincidences is Trump’s bid to become President in order to avoid justice for his actions.

 

 

So, but for the silly court cases he would not be running? 

[metisdead]

Troll posts contravening our Community Standards have been removed.

[Eric Loh]

31 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Splendid news from NY03 today.

And Pennsylvania 140th District Special Election. 

[candide]

7 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Oh, I see, its Trumps fault that the trials have been delated ., what a coincidence that the trials are due to be held at the same time as the next election 

Are you so uninformed? He's trying to get his trials delayed until after the elections, by asking for postponements and by appealing, while the accusation is trying to expedite them.

[Yellowtail]

21 minutes ago, candide said:

Are you so uninformed? He's trying to get his trials delayed until after the elections, by asking for postponements and by appealing, while the accusation is trying to expedite them.

The "accusation" is trying to expedite them now, after dragging their feet for two or three years. 

 

Why should he not appeal? Why should he not delay? 

 

 

[Chomper Higgot]

13 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

The "accusation" is trying to expedite them now, after dragging their feet for two or three years. 

 

Why should he not appeal? Why should he not delay? 

 

 

Trump is entitled to appeal and attempt delays. 
 

It’s all he got left.

 

 

[candide]

14 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

The "accusation" is trying to expedite them now, after dragging their feet for two or three years. 

 

Why should he not appeal? Why should he not delay? 

 

 

Not 2-3 years. The MAL search occurred in August 2022. 😁

 

Trump delay strategy is probably good for him...or not.

 

 

[Yellowtail]

2 minutes ago, candide said:

Not 2-3 years. The MAL search occurred in August 2022. 😁

 

Trump delay strategy is probably good for him...or not.

 

 

 

Well, it was good for Biden. He had classified documents illegally for over 15 years and he got a pass. 

[candide]

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

 

Well, it was good for Biden. He had classified documents illegally for over 15 years and he got a pass. 

15 years? It seems you have problems with numbers!

[scottiejohn]

11 minutes ago, candide said:

15 years? It seems you have problems with numbers!

It seems you have problems with numbers facts!

[candide]

4 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

It seems you have problems with numbers facts!

Which fact?

[Yellowtail]

15 minutes ago, candide said:

15 years? It seems you have problems with numbers!

Okay, it could have been much longer. He had classified documents illegally from when he was a Senator, which means at least 15 years and perhaps as long as 50 years, is that better?

[Yellowtail]

Just now, candide said:

Which fact?

He has no idea. 

[candide]

20 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Okay, it could have been much longer. He had classified documents illegally from when he was a Senator, which means at least 15 years and perhaps as long as 50 years, is that better?

There's no PRA for Senators! The files of Congress members are considered their personal property and are not subject to the same restrictions as presidential records, which are considered government property

And as VP, he was allowed to have classified documents, and even to classify them.

Who has no idea?

Edited February 14 by candide

[Jingthing]

19 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Okay, it could have been much longer. He had classified documents illegally from when he was a Senator, which means at least 15 years and perhaps as long as 50 years, is that better?

You pulled that out of your arse.

[scottiejohn]

51 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

You pulled that out of your arse.

Like most of his other "contributions" to various forums.

[scottiejohn]

1 hour ago, candide said:

Which fact?

All the so called "facts" that @Yellowtail quotes!

Sorry if you thought I was referencing you!

(I cannot find the "I am Sorry" emoji!)

 

[candide]

2 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

All the so called "facts" that @Yellowtail quotes!

Sorry if you thought I was referencing you!

(I cannot find the "I am Sorry" emoji!)

 

Ah OK! 

[heybruce]

11 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

You see... that is where the democrats differ... they think that giving back the documents means that there was no crime committed... however there was still a crime committed.

Oh Great Legal Wizard, did you read the Espionage Act?

 

"Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it;https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793