Single Farang has sex in sea: Onlookers see, resulting in death of Farang.

[GammaGlobulin]

Dear Friends,

 

While watching this video, I hope we will all be reminded of the fact that we should practice tolerance for minor foibles and errors of judgment, especially when others' behavior causes no harm to us.

 

This poor female Farang decided to have sex in the sea, by herself, resulting in arrest, and probably leading to her untimely death.

 

How terrible it seems that our society can find nothing better to do than to point fingers at others when we have wooden beams protruding from our own eyes.

 

I feel sorry for this young Farang female.

 

ALSO, I am happy to be living in Thailand, once more, for this reason:

 

If this woman had moved to Thailand before she was arrested, then she would have been most welcome on the beaches of Pattaya, free to have sex with herself in the sea, for all to see, and she might have even been able to support herself, financially, by doing so.

 

So then, were the cops in Georgia wrong to treat this woman in such an unkind way?

Don't you wish that you could go back in a time machine to speak to that woman and to invite her to come to Pattaya, a place that might truly welcome and accept her, with open arms?

 

I do....

 

 

It's a Cruel World, and NOT a Cool World, the one in which we live....alas....

 

Regards,

Gamma

 

 

  

[Negativ]

6 hours ago, GammaGlobulin said:

It's a Cruel World, and NOT a Cool World, the one in which we live

 

Amen

[Nick Carter icp]

7 hours ago, GammaGlobulin said:

If this woman had moved to Thailand before she was arrested, then she would have been most welcome on the beaches of Pattaya, free to have sex with herself in the sea, for all to see, and she might have even been able to support herself, financially, by doing so.

 

   I can see how that thought got to the written word .

You were thinking that you would have liked to watch her playing with herself and you would have even have paid to watch her .

   You aren't thinking about her, you are just thinking about your own gratification .

You would have liked to play with yourself whilst watching her  , lets not pretend that you have any concern for her well bring .

   BTW, its illegal to masturbate in public in Thailand and she would have been arrested in Thailand as well 

[GammaGlobulin]

1 hour ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

sidenote here is the site of said vdo and all the wonderful vids our AS poster likes to watch and create fear and panic to our members here...smh....do better....please

 

https://www.youtube.com/@ApeHuncho

 

Thank you for your input, however, I respectfully disagree, and I maintain that the arrest and needless shaming of this poor woman was directly responsible for her subsequent downward spiral and ultimate self-offing.

 

In addition, I actually made no deep dive to find the video, as you suggested.

 

In fact, here on the forum, a different contributor has recently uploaded several Farang-Sex-in-the-Sea news stories. 

 

AND, after reading those news stories, and searching for more information about the news stories posted by the Asean Now contributor, I found the YT video concerning the sad case I posted here in the OP.

 

Also, I found further facts and details offered by this reliable, mainstream media outlet:

 

Again, it is my opinion that the shaming of this woman that happened on a beach in Georgia was the cause of her death spiral leading to a horrific death, one which was not an instant death, but in fact a death of prolonged suffering as she probably staggered from room to room during her final throes.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12811033/Christina-Revels-Glick-arrested-masturbating-beach-suicide.html

 

I believe this is an example of cause and effect.

And the cause is the very prudish society which we all know exists in Georgia.

 

The Eastern Seaboard of America has always been prudish, and it has been prudish since the days Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote about in his great exposé, The Scarlet Letter.

 

I am just glad I live in Asia, and not in the New America of this present century.

 

The woman in question was a college grad, and seemed like a nice person who had been gainfully employed with a nice house and a BMW.

 

What happened?

As I said, it's a Cruel World, and NOT a Cool World, out there....Folks.

 

I say, RIP.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[SAFETY FIRST]

A female Using a vibrator (masturbating) in a public place is not normal behaviour. 

 

Poor girl had mental health issues. 

 

[SAFETY FIRST]

2 hours ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

i would agree.....the OP seems to be defending her behavior and normalizing it as it being acceptable behavior in LOS....in a highly conservative culture---outside of the backdoor "illegal " sex trade

Agree, the OP has tried his to defend this girl, he has even posted with false title 'sex in the sea resulting in death'. 

 

[impulse]

41 minutes ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

Agree, the OP has tried his to defend this girl, he has even posted with false title 'sex in the sea resulting in death'. 

 

 

If he was trying to draw a line between her suicide and mental health and the abysmal state of the US healthcare system's availability/affordability of mental health care, I'd agree with him.

 

If he's trying to draw a connecting line between her arrest and her suicide, not so much.

 

Edit:  I also question the reference to her as "farang", since she's not in Thailand.

 

 

[GammaGlobulin]

2 hours ago, impulse said:

 

Edit:  I also question the reference to her as "farang", since she's not in Thailand.

 

I would like to take a moment to address this issue concerning what is necessary to qualify as being a Farang:

 

a. First, there is no space-time continuum requirement necessary to remain a Farang.

b. This means that once a Farang, always a Farang.

c. We know that a Farang is a Caucasian, "a person of white race", according to the Royal Institute Dictionary.

d. Also, some Caucasians are not Farang.  Take the example of someone from India, who is not considerred to be a Farang, but rather to be a Kaek.

e. Then we have black Farang, but that is a whole different can of worms.

f.  But, here is a case study which helps to clarify:

 

1. When I am in Thailand, people call me Farang.

2. When I travel to Japan, my Thai friends email me, and they address me as Farang.

3. When Farang tourists are boarding a plane bound for Thailand, they are Farang passengers.

4. When they return to their home country, they never cease being Farang travelers who have visited Thailand.

5. I will ALWAYS be a Farang.  Also, no sort of surgery, such as a sex change operation, can alter the fact that I was born a Farang.

6. I do not mind being called a Farang. And, my Thai friends say I am a "Good Farang".

 

g. In conclusion, there is definitely ZERO space-time continuum requirements on being a Farang.  One could be a Farang both in Thailand and also standing on the South Pole.

 

The reason I am willing to devote extra time to this definition/clarification of the term Farang is that I believe that all anthropological terminology should be clear and concise and UNAMBIGUOUS, too.

 

Please refer to this Wikipedia article for further information on the derivation, etymology, and usage of the term Farang:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farang

 

 

 

Please note that, according to the above information, Farang can be subdivided into the Black Farang and White Farang.

 

There are further subdivisions which can be considered slang and insulting, but I have never heard these in real life in Thailand, or elsewhere.

 

Addendum:

 

Furthermore, it is often the case that Thai people will read news stories about white people in foreign lands, on the internet for example, and it is also true that Thai people refer to the foreign white people in the news as Farang.

 

Therefore, I believe that my use of Farang in the Headline is ENTIRELY correct and appropriate.  I know, after more careful consideration, that you will agree with my position.   Farang is an important word.  We need to get it right in our minds!

 

 

[Lacessit]

In a country where 50% of the population still believes in angels, laws can't be expected to be rational.

[kiwikeith]

On 4/19/2024 at 5:28 AM, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   I can see how that thought got to the written word .

You were thinking that you would have liked to watch her playing with herself and you would have even have paid to watch her .

   You aren't thinking about her, you are just thinking about your own gratification .

You would have liked to play with yourself whilst watching her  , lets not pretend that you have any concern for her well bring .

   BTW, its illegal to masturbate in public in Thailand and she would have been arrested in Thailand as well 

Well said, I thought the article very strange, sick. 

[GammaGlobulin]

3 hours ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

to whom? besides thais

 

yes cos they are THAI

 

what if im boarding china air? or korean? or EVA air?..incorrect again..im whatever my PASSPORT says im from...asian--european--american-swiss.....

 

the cops arresting here didnt call her that ,as SHE has NEVER been to LOS and nor have the police who are NOT THAI

 

as thais will do...in thailand and from thai mouths

 

oh the irony.....SMH   good grief......read b..then read the exact opposite d.....you just contradicted yourself.....if a tourist is in thailand..thais may call them farang as is THAI culture...end of story

 

 

I would suggest that you, Sir, spend more time reading BOOKS, especially books which discuss  Set Theory, Venn Diagrams, and Formal Logic.

 

Let me make this the least painful for you to understand the simple logic of my statement which you mistakenly believe is not logically correct:

 

I said that Farang are Caucasians.  I said that Indians are Caucasians. And, I stated that Indians are not considered to be Farang. Instead, they are considered to be classified as Kaeks by Thai people.  You seem to think that this obvious logic is somehow impossible.

 

So, to bring the logic down to the level of a Two-Year-Old, please consider this example:

 

 

a.  Humans are primates.

b. Baboons are primates.

c.  Humans are not baboons.   (With a few exceptions, it seems, here on TV)

 

NOW....

Do you finally....

GET it?????

 

Here is a VENN diagram for you.

Knock yourself out, trying to figure it out.

Then, call me in the morning....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[GammaGlobulin]

22 hours ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

correct..as i broke down every single sentence in his post...if you watch the video and the article link it even states the police offered to help her and her pets and her family even rules out suicide.....

 

a. No matter what her family might say, the Medical Examiner, Joni Skipper, rules the manner of death: Suicide

 

b. In addition, as many have commented elsewhere, her family members were not supportive of this poor woman.  With a family like hers, in fact, then who needs enemies?

 

 

I think it is time for us to have more sympathy, and feel more empathy, for women like this who are so very obviously VICTIMS of their environments, beginning at such an early age.

 

We just gotta keep in mind that:

 

Human behavior is shaped by and is a result of ....

a. Environment

b. Genes  (both the genetic inheritance, as well as the expression of these genes due to environmental factors)

c. The very concept of some sort of "Free Will" is entirely bogus.

 

In fact, our bodies are just tubes within tubes.

And, our tubes are guided by an electro-chemical machine which is not affected by any nonexistent "soul" or "spirit".

 

Whatever we might think we "know", our own consciousness is a result of electro-chemical processes which are not controlled by "Us" or "God".

 

Perhaps if we all could better understand behavioral causes, ie that we do not have "free will" to decide our action, EVER, then we might be able to feel less critical of the behavior of others.

 

Of course, even this understanding is a product of electro-chemical processes beyond our control.  Therefore, asking anyone to understand these simple truths is a fool's errand.  Either we understand or we do not.  And this understanding is beyond our control, obviously.

 

 

 

[Captain Monday]

22 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

a. No matter what her family might say, the Medical Examiner, Joni Skipper, rules the manner of death: Suicide

 

b. In addition, as many have commented elsewhere, her family members were not supportive of this poor woman.  With a family like hers, in fact, then who needs enemies?

 

 

I think it is time for us to have more sympathy, and feel more empathy, for women like this who are so very obviously VICTIMS of their environments, beginning at such an early age.

 

We just gotta keep in mind that:

 

Human behavior is shaped by and is a result of ....

a. Environment

b. Genes  (both the genetic inheritance, as well as the expression of these genes due to environmental factors)

c. The very concept of some sort of "Free Will" is entirely bogus.

 

In fact, our bodies are just tubes within tubes.

And, our tubes are guided by an electro-chemical machine which is not affected by any nonexistent "soul" or "spirit".

 

Whatever we might think we "know", our own consciousness is a result of electro-chemical processes which are not controlled by "Us" or "God".

 

Perhaps if we all could better understand behavioral causes, ie that we do not have "free will" to decide our action, EVER, then we might be able to feel less critical of the behavior of others.

 

Of course, even this understanding is a product of electro-chemical processes beyond our control.  Therefore, asking anyone to understand these simple truths is a fool's errand.  Either we understand or we do not.  And this understanding is beyond our control, obviously.

 

 

 

Regarding the summary of findings of the postmortem. 
one of those kids years ago who attempted suicide because of Heavy Metal did the chin shot. Blew his whole jaw off and grievous injury but he survived 

 

Would it not be better to suck the barrel?

 

 

 

 

[fondue zoo]

 

 

Wait, farang องคชาต, I think I've heard that in the 7/11 when I visit, but not in a good way, I'm not sure what the word in Thai is for small.

 

 

[GammaGlobulin]

56 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

I said that Farang are Caucasians.  I said that Indians are Caucasians. And, I stated that Indians are not considered to be Farang. Instead, they are considered to be classified as Kaeks by Thai people.  You seem to think that this obvious logic is somehow impossible.

 

Please let me clarify, once again:

 

The term "Caucasian" is already obsolete, even though sometimes still used in places like the USA, etc.

 

The only reason I used it here in this Topic is that it is part of the Thai idea of Farang being white, which I think might not be entirely correct.

But this does not mean that I do not enjoy being called a Farang, because I do; I DO!

 

Also, is the population of India Caucasian?

No, in the sense that 

 

[GammaGlobulin]

4 minutes ago, Captain Monday said:

Regarding the summary of findings of the postmortem. 
one of those kids years ago who attempted suicide because of Heavy Metal did the chin shot. Blew his whole jaw off and grievous injury but he survived 

 

Would it not be better to suck the barrel?

 

 

 

 

 

Yes.

Do the Hemingway if you want to play it safe.

 

(Still, poor girl!  She met a very tragic and tortuous end, at her own hand.  Such irony!)

 

 

 

[Captain Monday]

31 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

Yes.

Do the Hemingway if you want to play it safe.

 

(Still, poor girl!  She met a very tragic and tortuous end, at her own hand.  Such irony!)

 

 

 

Vasquez and Gorman were out of ammo and about to be captured by a xenomorph. Took it out and avoided capture with a thermal detonator 

[soalbundy]

7 hours ago, Lacessit said:

In a country where 50% of the population still believes in angels, laws can't be expected to be rational.

Are you talking about America?

[soalbundy]

Strange girl, takes her Vibrator to the beach.....as one does.

[Lacessit]

7 minutes ago, soalbundy said:

Are you talking about America?

Yes.

[GammaGlobulin]

28 minutes ago, soalbundy said:

Are you talking about America?

 

Maybe, Central America.

The Mexican culture is very big on Angels.

Remember that great film, Under the Volcano.

Plenty of souls walking around on the Day Of The Dead.

 

And, remember what once was a great city:  The Once Great City of....  Los Angeles

 

 

[Jack Batty]

So glad to have retired from this crap after 23 years. Stupid laws and dealing with stupid people. Love the pension though!!!

[john donson]

difference between masturbating for a woman, dresses, facing the sea with no one around vs using a dildo and facing public, maybe even one filmed it for onlyfans...

[Koguma]

This has been some A grade solid trolling.   

Too bad the OP is an actual human-troll hybrid degen; but well done! 🤣

[fredwiggy]

On 4/20/2024 at 7:34 AM, GammaGlobulin said:

 

a. No matter what her family might say, the Medical Examiner, Joni Skipper, rules the manner of death: Suicide

 

b. In addition, as many have commented elsewhere, her family members were not supportive of this poor woman.  With a family like hers, in fact, then who needs enemies?

 

 

I think it is time for us to have more sympathy, and feel more empathy, for women like this who are so very obviously VICTIMS of their environments, beginning at such an early age.

 

We just gotta keep in mind that:

 

Human behavior is shaped by and is a result of ....

a. Environment

b. Genes  (both the genetic inheritance, as well as the expression of these genes due to environmental factors)

c. The very concept of some sort of "Free Will" is entirely bogus.

 

In fact, our bodies are just tubes within tubes.

And, our tubes are guided by an electro-chemical machine which is not affected by any nonexistent "soul" or "spirit".

 

Whatever we might think we "know", our own consciousness is a result of electro-chemical processes which are not controlled by "Us" or "God".

 

Perhaps if we all could better understand behavioral causes, ie that we do not have "free will" to decide our action, EVER, then we might be able to feel less critical of the behavior of others.

 

Of course, even this understanding is a product of electro-chemical processes beyond our control.  Therefore, asking anyone to understand these simple truths is a fool's errand.  Either we understand or we do not.  And this understanding is beyond our control, obviously.

 

Human behavior is shaped mainly by what we encounter in our first five years of life. If our parents are abusive or we are neglected or spoiled, we grow up to have narcissist traits, just like they did. After those first five years, when we basically learn the most important things about life, we enforce those encounters unless we are taken out of that kind of environment and actually loved and cared for. Then it can be turned around with a lot of that love, which is all about trust.

 

Genetics are involved in many behaviors, but that first environment is the most important part. Some, very rarely, are born with sociopathic tendencies. Our soul is what's left after the body dies, and that's something some don't believe, but that's okay, it's their deal.  God doesn't control s which is why we indeed have free will, to choose our actions. If we can't exercise our free will, it's because we are being controlled by other humans, which does happen in this day of more slavery than any other time. Saying we don't have free will is ludicrous. Does anyone else tell you what you can do every day?

 

As far as the farang thing, this is mainly Thais that are calling us this, many times to our faces, which is the epitome of rude behavior. The kids learn it from their ignorant parents, and it goes down the generations. If a Thai is living in the US, we don't point at them and say "Thai"!. Everyone in America has relatives from other countries, which is why only the ignorant prejudiced morons exercise such behavior. The term farang indeed means white person, but it's not an excuse to call us that here nor anywhere else. It's just ignorance, as is the newer term, "prang".

 

 

[GammaGlobulin]

23 hours ago, Jack Batty said:

So glad to have retired from this crap after 23 years. Stupid laws and dealing with stupid people. Love the pension though!!!

 

Do you have any good "on the job" sea stories of circumstances similar to the account of this sad woman's tragedy and demise?

 

[Jingthing]

Who hasn't penetrated themselves with a vibrator on a public beach in the bible belt?

[GammaGlobulin]

1 hour ago, fredwiggy said:

 

 

Sorry, but I can no longer agree with you concerning this hypothesis that environment is the overriding force determining behavior in humans throughout our lives, and that it is environment and experience during the first 5 or 7 years of life that is predominant in shaping behavior.

 

I once was, many years ago, a Behaviorist, but I no longer agree with the garbage science of Social Scientists.

 

Environment plays a role, certainly, but mostly through regulating gene expression, and through diet and disease, as well as, as you say, our experiences with others.

 

It is important to continue to focus on Twin Studies, of course.

 

Also, we can expect to have new research tools in the near future which may be useful in better analyzing human behavior, "deviant" human behavior, and especially Learning, which is a field that may yield important potential benefits (social and individual benefits).

 

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01609-6

 

 

So, keep your eyes on the balls of Twin Studies which are still important for behavioral research today, and interesting, too.

 

Nature is one of those Science Rags that we don't like, sometimes, due to its frequent publishing of inconvenient truths....

 

 

[fredwiggy]

2 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

Sorry, but I can no longer agree with you concerning this hypothesis that environment is the overriding force determining behavior in humans throughout our lives, and that it is environment and experience during the first 5 or 7 years of life that is predominant in shaping behavior.

 

I once was, many years ago, a Behaviorist, but I no longer agree with the garbage science of Social Scientists.

 

Environment plays a role, certainly, but mostly through regulating gene expression, and through diet and disease, as well as, as you say, our experiences with others.

 

It is important to continue to focus on Twin Studies, of course.

 

Also, we can expect to have new research tools in the near future which may be useful in better analyzing human behavior, "deviant" human behavior, and especially Learning, which is a field that may yield important potential benefits (social and individual benefits).

 

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01609-6

 

 

So, keep your eyes on the balls of Twin Studies which are still important for behavioral research today, and interesting, too.

 

Nature is one of those Science Rags that we don't like, sometimes, due to its frequent publishing of inconvenient truths....

 

 

It doesn't matter if you agree with me or not. I'm not making an hypothesis about this but going by what's been written and what I have personally seen, which is the same. I happen to be right on regarding what I said about the ages 0-5 being the most important in a child's life. This is when they learn most everything about life, regarding trust, care, love, kindness, responsibility, sharing, or the lack of those in an abusive or neglective environment.

 

The breakdown of the family is the reason for all of the world's problems, as it all starts at home. Either you're brought up respecting life, or shown abusing it. Much of this also comes from pet ownership. People who are taught that it's okay to abuse animals will see humans are targets also.

 

I have studied human psychology for the last 30 plus years, reading many books and thousands of articles on narcissism, depression, marriage, children, relationships and how men and women relate. In my life, through my own bad choices in a few mates, I have seen this firsthand how a woman ends up in her relationships after being abused and or neglected as a child, and I have seen where it came from in many instances, meaning her parents behavior still. It has been proven time and again through many writers , who have interviewed millions of people and couples, where they learned their behaviors.

 

People learn about the world through their parents, by watching them. Of course two children can come from a very loving home and one can go astray while the other succeeds. This doesn't mean that child is bad. It can be from getting involved with bad peers. It can be because one parent, or both, favored one child over the other. It's hard to treat each child as anything besides individuals, and sometimes you favor one you can relate to better. This doesn't mean neglect the other but making a conscience effort to keep things as equal as possible, so they both know love. Kids understand who loves them more, but if they're still loved, they get past little things. Sibling rivalry is part from how a parent shows love to each. Jealousy happens, so it's best to treat each one as equally as possible.

 

Twins are a little different, as each works off the other, and they share a lot of traits, but the learning process from 0-5 is still the same regarding how they go into the world.

 

Again, a child can be treated with much love and care, and still go into the world and make huge mistakes, and who they regard as their peers is responsible for much of this. The child knows what they should or shouldn't do, as the parents taught them, but rebelliousness, as all children must do, sometimes comes with severe consequences. If your friends are into drugs and these are friends you like and respect, you're immature brain sometimes makes bad decisions, and you go along with those friends because you want to fit in.

 

If you are abused as a child, and or neglected, you go into the world hating or not trusting everyone, using them to get what you have missed, because no one ever taught you otherwise. This is how a narcissist is created, and the reason most relationships fail, the reason many get a power trip and think they have to control others, and the reason most go into politics. This is the alpha males some look at as a good thing, when they are the real reason things go wrong here. The betas raise the children, treat their women right, and work for the family's best interests. The alphas become the players, who look at women as objects to use, and other people to take from. World out of balance, and again, it all starts at home.

[GammaGlobulin]

4 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Twins are a little different, as each works off the other, and they share a lot of traits, but the learning process from 0-5 is still the same regarding how they go into the world.

 

Sure, and I fully understand what you are claiming.

 

However, when we talk about Twin Studies:

 

We usually are referring to studies in which genetic twins, ie identical or monozygotic twins, are physically separated soon after birth, and are reared in different environments, sometimes even in different countries and cultures.

 

Using Twin Studies of this type often allows us to separate influences due to nurture vs nature when researching human behavior.