Jump to content

Trump found guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records


webfact

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, stoner said:

 

you have failed to answer the simple but quite important question. does it need repeating or are you good to answer ? 

If you want to audit and relitigate the case I suggest you avail yourself of all the facts first.

I have supplied links to all the case dockets etc.

Fill you boots, see you in a month!

'§ 17-152. Conspiracy to promote or prevent election. Any two or more
persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to
a public office by unlawful means and which conspiracy is acted upon by
one or more of the parties thereto, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor'.

NYS Open Legislation | NYSenate.gov

People of The State of New York v. Trump, 1:23-cv-03773 – CourtListener.com

Case Details - Summary (state.ny.us)

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

If you want to audit and relitigate the case I suggest you avail yourself of all the facts first.

I have supplied links to all the case dockets etc.

Fill you boots, see you in a month!

'§ 17-152. Conspiracy to promote or prevent election. Any two or more
persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to
a public office by unlawful means and which conspiracy is acted upon by
one or more of the parties thereto, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor'.

NYS Open Legislation | NYSenate.gov

People of The State of New York v. Trump, 1:23-cv-03773 – CourtListener.com

Case Details - Summary (state.ny.us)

 

ok so you don't want to answer. you could of just said that. 

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

I detect sarcasm. Anyway even his most fanatic supporters are not totally invested in him as much as some of you may think. Reality that they may suffered the same fate as Henry Enrique 22 years in prison will wake up their senses. 

Yes there was an element of Sarcasm, yet it will only take a couple of crazies, convinced of the cause and certain that if caught, they will be pardoned by the New Year. Certainly Trump will be looking for revenge!

Edited by herfiehandbag
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

If you want to audit and relitigate the case I suggest you avail yourself of all the facts first.

I have supplied links to all the case dockets etc.

Fill you boots, see you in a month!

'§ 17-152. Conspiracy to promote or prevent election. Any two or more
persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to
a public office by unlawful means and which conspiracy is acted upon by
one or more of the parties thereto, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor'.

NYS Open Legislation | NYSenate.gov

People of The State of New York v. Trump, 1:23-cv-03773 – CourtListener.com

Case Details - Summary (state.ny.us)

The CourtListener link you provided is the Federal Court case wherein Trump team wanted the case moved from NY State Court to the Federal Court as it involved time when Trump was President. (obviously failed). Nothing to do with the just concluded NY State Court case Judge Merchan presiding.

Edited by jerrymahoney
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, candide said:

And as usual, you will accept the appeal verdict only if it's in favor of Trump. 

How many times have we read that " you will see" from you, and you never accepted the outcome. You will see the Kraken and other B.S., you will see the IG investigation, you will see the Durham investigation. You never accept the outcome when you don't like the outcome! 😀

 

 

he reminds me of a broken record. He needs to reflect and quesion why he fails to see this. Take the time dude~

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, rocketboy2 said:

 

 I'm a brit, and when Trump get back in , hopefully he will sort a few of the world problems out.

unlike this idiot you have now.

look what's happened on his watch.

we all have a real stake in the game. not just the Americans.

Thanks for you being truthfull. Not really a trait of the MAGA But UK ...

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Going into the trial, I thought that Trump had a good chance of being acquitted.

 

The Prosecution put on a good case, but what really sunk Trump was his bad defense.

 

@jerrymahoney would have put on a better defense.

 

The only worse defense was @Yellowtail's amnesia defense:

 

"What are the charges? If you haven't memorized the charges, Trump must be innocent". I don't think that would have worked in court.

Edited by Danderman123
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

The CourtListener link you provided is the Federal Court case wherein Trump team wanted the case moved from NY State Court to the Federal Court as it involved time when Trump was President. (obviously failed). Nothing to do with the just concluded NY State Court case Judge Merchan presiding.

Thanks for your help as always! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LosLobo said:

If you want to audit and relitigate the case I suggest you avail yourself of all the facts first.

I have supplied links to all the case dockets etc.

Fill you boots, see you in a month!

'§ 17-152. Conspiracy to promote or prevent election. Any two or more
persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to
a public office by unlawful means and which conspiracy is acted upon by
one or more of the parties thereto, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor'.

NYS Open Legislation | NYSenate.gov

People of The State of New York v. Trump, 1:23-cv-03773 – CourtListener.com

Case Details - Summary (state.ny.us)

UPDATE:
Delete People of The State etc:

Add: IND-71543-23/001

Legal News & Analysis on Litigation, Policy, Deals : Law360
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Truly delusional. Even Fox Not News polls show he lost voters and his stock plummeted.

 

He MAY win re-election, but Vegas oddsmakers have him losing, and THOSE guys are serious. The difference between people in church and people in Vegas? When the people in Vegas pray, they MEAN it.

Lots of faith in Vegas odds.  The same Vegas that  had Clinton winning.  Hope they are right this time around...  

Edited by atpeace
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Some inflammatory troll posts and the replies have been removed.

 

Posts using derogatory and toxic nicknames or intentional misspelling of people’s names will be removed. If you don’t want your post to be removed, spell people’s names correctly, this applies to both sides of the political debate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know if it's been mentioned, but trump has received more than $53 million in denotations in the 24 hours since his conviction. trump has asked for these monies, mostly from his base, even though he is a multi-billionaire. Additionally he held a fund raising dinner with the wealthy after his conviction, no doubt attended due to his promises to enact changes saving the wealthy business owners multiples of their denotations. IMO denotations from the wealthy are just another form of corruption.

 

trump appears to have his followers in a vice like grip who come across as absolutely deluded, as to the threat trump represents to the detriment of a Democratic Republic.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

 

 

The loudest opponents of the GOP are non US citizens. Isn't free speech grand.

Edited by stats
quote of hidden content removed
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, G_Money said:


Under instructions by the crooked biased judge who had family members on the Biden campaign.

 

No doubt Bragg will get a healthy gift from George Soros.  The check is in the mail. 
 

What other jury was given 2 weeks to succumb to peer pressure to convict?  
 

All staged, and yes they succeeded in their attempts.

 

Upstate New York would of had a different outcome.

Leaving aside your somewhat all encompassing and frantic allegations of "fixing", since the crime was committed in metropolitan New York, surely then the trial should take place in metropolitan New

 York?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...