Are these people stark raving mad?

[rasg]

17 hours ago, bendejo said:

 

The real danger Fox offers is what they DO NOT SHOW.  They do not show the MAGA crowd breaking windows, running through the Capitol building, that clown at Pelosi's desk; when they sort of covered the January 6 hearings they blurred out the screen in the House chamber showing the assault.  They may not cover anything scandalous regarding GOP/MAGA, I get the impression they didn't report the Boebert stick-shift incident. 

The reason DT flipped about Fox a few days ago is they said something unfavorable about him, and he can't handle that.

 

The speaker of the house released a lot of the CCTV from the Capitol that day and if you ever get to see it, you will know that you are totally wrong. J6 was a set up. Pelosi has recently been shown on video saying that it was mainly her fault for refusing Trump's offer of 10,000 of the National Guard.

[rasg]

17 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

You seem really distressed today. So much happened so long ago, that you are now whailing away! Where were you then?

Not at all. Just explaining a few facts that you are totally unaware of. Do some research.

[rasg]

11 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

They don't care....and Trump has (cleverly/despicably?) engineered this situation over a number of years where lying has become a nothing burger to the American public.

 

Vance said a Springfield resident’s cat was stolen and eaten. Instead, it was hiding - https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/jd-vance-pet-claims-springfield-ohio-b2615009.html

And you believe everything the MSM tells you!

[rasg]

11 hours ago, cjinchiangrai said:

There might be bloodshed but it would be at the hands of the losers. Losers like Trump, Losers like the militia gun nuts. Losers like the criminals of Jan 6. All to support a criminal in his efforts to avoid prison for a lifetime of criminal activity.

Yawn.

[rasg]

11 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Stop saying this is only about the left!

Is Liz Cheney the left?!?

Liz Cheney is a RINO nutjob and has been voting with the Dems for years.

Take a look at this to give you an idea of what she has been up to:
https://grabien.com/story.php?id=390212

She is also no longer represents Wyoming in Congress as she was crushed in the election in 2022.

Take a look.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/17/liz-cheney-historic-defeat/

[Jingthing]

5 minutes ago, rasg said:

Liz Cheney is a RINO nutjob and has been voting with the Dems for years.

Take a look at this to give you an idea of what she has been up to:
https://grabien.com/story.php?id=390212

She is also no longer represents Wyoming in Congress as she was crushed in the election in 2022.

Take a look.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/17/liz-cheney-historic-defeat/

 Nope.

She's a real republican.

Trump isn't.

He's a fascist cult leader.

Nothing to do with classic republican values.

[rasg]

1 hour ago, bendejo said:

 

Might also want to consider he's prepping for 2028 when his daughter will be running against Kamala.  Any words regarding his love of country qualifies as pure Wyoming horse manure.  The truth about this guy won't be revealed until most of us in this forum will be long gone.  And every potential biographer knows better than to take him/his on.

 

She was talking about running against Trump when she was slung out of Congress in 2022 by the historic margin of 37%. She was involved in the J6 stitch up which will all be sorted out over the coming months. She is not popular in Wyoming and people have long memories.

[rasg]

11 hours ago, cjinchiangrai said:

There might be bloodshed but it would be at the hands of the losers. Losers like Trump, Losers like the militia gun nuts. Losers like the criminals of Jan 6. All to support a criminal in his efforts to avoid prison for a lifetime of criminal activity.

Hilarious. You obviously have no idea just what is going on in the US right now.

[Enoon]

33 minutes ago, rasg said:

And you believe everything the MSM tells you!

 

"Interpersonal mistrust and trust in informal sources of information were related with both paranoia and conspiracy mentality although the association of both trust predictors was stronger with paranoid beliefs."

 

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1023366/full

 

 

[Jingthing]

12 minutes ago, rasg said:

Hilarious. You obviously have no idea just what is going on in the US right now.

Cats and dogs?

[rasg]

2 hours ago, bendejo said:

 

I interpreted that (you mean the TV interview with Dana Bash on Sept. 15, right?) as him griping that he puts a lot of hard work into coming up with these cockamamie stories, and that she should show some respect for that.  I developed an appreciation for Bash when, after DT's first debate with Biden in 2020 the first thing out of her mouth when the debate ended was "that was a sh_t show."  Oh those Jersey girls!

There is another highly ridiculous aspect to this thing about applauding Ivy League graduates.  The conservative media will go on into perpetuity about how US universities are incubators for the left, communist, Marxist (enter flavors of the day here), while at the same time lauding their members who have degrees from such institutions (Ted Cruz, Hawley, JD, and lots more) who they brand as scholars and true US conservatives, even as they come out with the dumbest statements to support their current deity.  Also in recent years the right-wing has been denouncing education, part of their dumbing-down strategy, and looking at the MAGA numbers it seems to be working.

 

Presumably you agree that porn and critical race theory should be shown in schools? Are drag acts in schools ok with you? That's exactly what's been going on since Trump left office.

[rasg]

23 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

 Nope.

She's a real republican.

Trump isn't.

He's a fascist cult leader.

Nothing to do with classic republican values.

So you mean she is  a warmonger like her father? You would be right on that. Trump introduced the peace accords in the Middle East and he started no wars while he was in office.  John McCain, Barack Obama, Clinton along with many others were directly responsible for the Colour Revolution in the Ukraine in 2014 that ousted Yanukovych to install Zelensky to deliberately provoke Putin.

[stoner]

20 minutes ago, rasg said:

So you mean she is  a warmonger like her father? You would be right on that. Trump introduced the peace accords in the Middle East and he started no wars while he was in office.  John McCain, Barack Obama, Clinton along with many others were directly responsible for the Colour Revolution in the Ukraine in 2014 that ousted Yanukovych to install Zelensky to deliberately provoke Putin.

 

ya but trump is a fascist. 

[placeholder]

1 hour ago, rasg said:

When the left have got the media and a large part of the court system in its pocket it's fairly easy to get the results you want. You have some surprises coming in the next few months that will turn your brain to mush.

What planet are you from? You must believe that there's a leftist majority on the Supreme Court. And even judges selected by Trump turned down just about all of his team's attempts to overturn the election. But thanks for sharing with us hints about what your crystal ball is telling you. I hope you aren't using one that's made in China. They're very glitchy, by all accounts.

[placeholder]

1 hour ago, rasg said:

The speaker of the house released a lot of the CCTV from the Capitol that day and if you ever get to see it, you will know that you are totally wrong. J6 was a set up. Pelosi has recently been shown on video saying that it was mainly her fault for refusing Trump's offer of 10,000 of the National Guard.

And yet, you offer no link to said video. Allergic to evidence, much?

[bradiston]

47 minutes ago, rasg said:

So you mean she is  a warmonger like her father? You would be right on that. Trump introduced the peace accords in the Middle East and he started no wars while he was in office.  John McCain, Barack Obama, Clinton along with many others were directly responsible for the Colour Revolution in the Ukraine in 2014 that ousted Yanukovych to install Zelensky to deliberately provoke Putin.

Rubbish. Yanukovich was elected on a pro EU ticket and welched on it. The Ukrainians kicked him out as a result. All this stuff about how the west engineered the 2014 "coup" is just Russian agitprop. I've been reading it now for months. Spouted by unregistered foreign agents such as yourself.

[soalbundy]

On 9/21/2024 at 12:30 PM, TheFishman1 said:

Trump is a liar of thief in a crook

Typical, trying to sell him on his good points but ignoring the bad side of him.

[Jingthing]

1 hour ago, rasg said:

So you mean she is  a warmonger like her father? You would be right on that. Trump introduced the peace accords in the Middle East and he started no wars while he was in office.  John McCain, Barack Obama, Clinton along with many others were directly responsible for the Colour Revolution in the Ukraine in 2014 that ousted Yanukovych to install Zelensky to deliberately provoke Putin.

Thanks for sharing the maga Kremlin propaganda. Same same not different.

[rasg]

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

And yet, you offer no link to said video. Allergic to evidence, much?

https://cha.house.gov/2024/6/nancy-pelosi-contradicts-her-own-narrative-of-january-6-hbo-footage-shows
 

www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-3208249/Video-Unaired-footage-Nancy-Pelosi-shows-responsibility-January-6.html

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6322049576112

 

[Jingthing]

1 hour ago, rasg said:

Presumably you agree that porn and critical race theory should be shown in schools? Are drag acts in schools ok with you? That's exactly what's been going on since Trump left office.

You forget the cats and dogs!

[rasg]

30 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Thanks for sharing the maga Kremlin propaganda. Same same not different.

This is Victoria Nuland of the US State Department discussing who should be the next President of Ukraine in 2014.

 

 

[simple1]

3 hours ago, rasg said:

And he is 100% right. Check out Operation Mockingbird though I doubt you'll bother. Does it not strike you as odd that every attack from the media has been coordinated for years and most of their ratings have gone down the toilet in the last few years?

 

I checked Operation Mockingbird. It was a program to identify intelligence leaks during JFK's admin. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Mockingbird

[simple1]

3 hours ago, rasg said:

It very valid. The Guardian is a very left wing daily toilet roll. What do you expect them to say? Seriously.

 

Guardian is a highly respected reporting platform. Yes, it's opinion pieces lean left.

[placeholder]

50 minutes ago, rasg said:

https://cha.house.gov/2024/6/nancy-pelosi-contradicts-her-own-narrative-of-january-6-hbo-footage-shows
 

www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-3208249/Video-Unaired-footage-Nancy-Pelosi-shows-responsibility-January-6.html

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6322049576112

 

Here's what you claimed:

"The speaker of the house released a lot of the CCTV from the Capitol that day and if you ever get to see it, you will know that you are totally wrong. J6 was a set up. Pelosi has recently been shown on video saying that it was mainly her fault for refusing Trump's offer of 10,000 of the National Guard."

 

No evidence exists that Trump offered her 10000 National Guard troops.

 

What we do know is that Trump stayed glued to his television set rather than order the National Guard in.  And he waited 187 minutes from the time of his speech rather than ask the rioters to leave. And this is testimony from his own staff and republicans who were in attendance at the White House

https://archive.ph/6Gzhj

 

And if  you need a reminder of why they're called rioters, here it is:

 

[johng]

31 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

I checked Operation Mockingbird. It was a program to identify intelligence leaks during JFK's admin.

Ha ha ha   you need to look somewhere other than Wikipedia.

[bradiston]

7 minutes ago, johng said:

Ha ha ha   you need to look somewhere other than Wikipedia.

 

Like here for instance?

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

 

Is this the same op you're referencing? Or are you talking Project Mockingbird?

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Mockingbird

[MarkBR]

3 hours ago, Enoon said:

 

"Interpersonal mistrust and trust in informal sources of information were related with both paranoia and conspiracy mentality although the association of both trust predictors was stronger with paranoid beliefs."

 

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1023366/full

 

 

Interesting paper

[Yagoda]

1 hour ago, rasg said:

This is Victoria Nuland of the US State Department discussing who should be the next President of Ukraine in 2014.

 

 

She needs prosecution.

[MarkBR]

49 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Here's what you claimed:

"The speaker of the house released a lot of the CCTV from the Capitol that day and if you ever get to see it, you will know that you are totally wrong. J6 was a set up. Pelosi has recently been shown on video saying that it was mainly her fault for refusing Trump's offer of 10,000 of the National Guard."

 

No evidence exists that Trump offered her 10000 National Guard troops.

 

What we do know is that Trump stayed glued to his television set rather than order the National Guard in.  And he waited 187 minutes from the time of his speech rather than ask the rioters to leave. And this is testimony from his own staff and republicans who were in attendance at the White House

https://archive.ph/6Gzhj

 

And if  you need a reminder of why they're called rioters, here it is:

 

The Daily Heil/Fail/Bile is not a good source of truth-related information.

[bendejo]

3 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Thanks for sharing the maga Kremlin propaganda. Same same not different.

 

Aren't we fortunate to have someone like him (her?) to tell us the truth?