Kamala had to pay celebrities to appear.

[Cryingdick]

I have no idea which ones showed up for free or got paid. Oprah reportedly got $1 million. The Harris campaign is in debt $20 million. She spent an entire $1 billion the most ever in campaign history, during the shortest campaign ever and got such bad results. Can you imagine her trying to make policy for the USA given this record? 

 

The stars seemingly didn't even genuinely support her.

 

https://nypost.com/2024/11/08/us-news/kamala-harris-campaigns-election-eve-concerts-said-to-cost-up-to-20m-as-rank-and-file-staff-vendors-fear-they-wont-be-paid/

Edited November 10 by Cryingdick

[mdr224]

These are the kinds of stories i was hoping to see post election. Lets get everything exposed and out in the open for everyone to see

Edited November 10 by mdr224

[Jingthing]

Not what you said.

Sore winner.

Your link.

 

While the performers donated their time and talent, the sets still required an immense commitment of manpower and financial resources.

[Cryingdick]

1 minute ago, Jingthing said:

Not what you said.

Sore winner.

Your link.

 

While the performers donated their time and talent, the sets still required an immense commitment of manpower and financial resources.

I said I wasn't sure about others but Oprah got paid a million bucks. You might say it was for hosting not directly. Whatever. 

 

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/oprah-winfrey-reportedly-charged-1-million-for-hosting-harris-interview/articleshow/115122387.cms

[Patong2021]

3 minutes ago, Cryingdick said:

I said I wasn't sure about others but Oprah got paid a million bucks. You might say it was for hosting not directly. Whatever. 

 

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/oprah-winfrey-reportedly-charged-1-million-for-hosting-harris-interview/articleshow/115122387.cms

 

You are not sure of anything and are posting  innuendo and unsubstantiated  claims.

Your link does not state that Oprah was paid $1 million. It is unfortunate that you have a limited comprehension of the English language. The article uses the term  "Reportedly" . the word is used when  someone wishes to  make a negative comment,  and has no evidence to support the negative claim.  Your claim is based upon  a twisted interpretation of expenditures for digital media advertising. All campaigns paid for digital media  activity.

[Patong2021]

24 minutes ago, mdr224 said:

These are the kinds of stories i was hoping to see post election. Lets get everything exposed and out in the open for everyone to see

 

More lies and invented  fact? There is nothing substantive in the claim. It is just guttersniping.

[thesetat2013]

7 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

More lies and invented  fact? There is nothing substantive in the claim. It is just guttersniping.

I do not know if true or not. But there are several news services that are not Democratically controlled saying the same things about this. She got 1.2 million in campaign donations and spent it all and still owes 20 mil. Also, several news services are saying she paid outrageous amounts for the actors and singers and even to Oprah for supporting her and participating in her campaign. Before you put down the OP which has provided several links you should look at them all.. 

[Cryingdick]

1 minute ago, thesetat2013 said:

I do not know if true or not. But there are several news services that are not Democratically controlled saying the same things about this. She got 1.2 million in campaign donations and spent it all and still owes 20 mil. Also, several news services are saying she paid outrageous amounts for the actors and singers and even to Oprah for supporting her and participating in her campaign. Before you put down the OP which has provided several links you should look at them all.. 

 

Apparently she spent 6 figures on a set for the Call Her daddy podcast. We can expense it a few ways but six figures for a room for a short interview seems a bit much. If that is true it is actually very telling as well. The real story is she is absolutely horrible with money and squandered a billion bucks.

[dinsdale]

Ah! Who cares. Didn't work for Clinton and hasn't worked for Harris. Trump sweeps ALL 7 swing states, the blue wall is red and he finishes with 312 electoral votes and the popular vote. An absolute and indisputable thumping. >$1,000,000,000 Harris flushed down the drain and it seems a some of it into some already deep pockets.

Edited November 10 by dinsdale

[Cryingdick]

57 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Ah! Who cares. Didn't work for Clinton and hasn't worked for Harris. Trump sweeps ALL 7 swing states, the blue wall is red and he finishes with 312 electoral votes and the popular vote. An absolute and indisputable thumping. >$1,000,000,000 Harris flushed down the drain and it seems a some of it into some already deep pockets.

Think of the carbon footprint. 

[impulse]

3 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

Apparently she spent 6 figures on a set for the Call Her daddy podcast. We can expense it a few ways but six figures for a room for a short interview seems a bit much. If that is true it is actually very telling as well. The real story is she is absolutely horrible with money and squandered a billion bucks.

 

I'm also forecasting that a bunch of her campaign officials suddenly buy mansions and Ferraris they couldn't afford last year.  You know, like those BLM "activists".

 

 

[frank83628]

3 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

 

More lies and invented  fact? There is nothing substantive in the claim. It is just guttersniping.

Oh look, the shoe is on the other foot now.   

[paul1804]

We the public get told so many lies and in many instances the main stream media is the biggest distorter of the truth, especially when it comes to politics & money. However I am sure the Harris campaign gobbled up a huge amount of money that has a questionable distribution chain, remember the BLM scenario!

 

I guess choosing Harris was like backing a draft horse in a sprint race and if she is the best candidate the democrats can offer then fortunately for Americans the Republicans won! 

[Iron Tongue]

The DNC burned-through over US$1,000,000,000 in 90 days.

 

Still couldn't get people to vote for Kamala.

 

Hmmm 

[Chosenfew]

6 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Not what you said.

Sore winner.

Your link.

 

While the performers donated their time and talent, the sets still required an immense commitment of manpower and financial resources.

He is locked in your head:

 

[jesimps]

6 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Not what you said.

Sore winner.

Your link.

 

While the performers donated their time and talent, the sets still required an immense commitment of manpower and financial resources.

You would have thought that the "stars" would gladly have paid for the sets. A drop in the ocean for them, especially since they're supposed to be so committed to the lefty cause. Hypocrites, the lot of them.

[jesimps]

6 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

 

You are not sure of anything and are posting  innuendo and unsubstantiated  claims.

Your link does not state that Oprah was paid $1 million. It is unfortunate that you have a limited comprehension of the English language. The article uses the term  "Reportedly" . the word is used when  someone wishes to  make a negative comment,  and has no evidence to support the negative claim.  Your claim is based upon  a twisted interpretation of expenditures for digital media advertising. All campaigns paid for digital media  activity.

Knowing the way lefties are so quick to eat each other (see the current blame game) I believe every word of it.

[Jingthing]

The entire premise of this topic is disinformation.

[udontomi]

cryingdick cited his source!  These sources are the ones you should be jumping on, not this poster!

[edwardflory]

I have US TV. Explain to me how the DNC spent 250 MILLION ( 25% of total donations - JUST a estimate  ) and I saw few ads on TV - I watch 5 different US channels on a regular basis - 3 DNC oriented, 2 conservative.

[mokwit]

7 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Not what you said.

Sore winner.

Your link.

 

While the performers donated their time and talent, the sets still required an immense commitment of manpower and financial resources.

Beyonce reputedly was paid $10m to speak from a lectern for a few minutes.

[impulse]

There's also a lot of press about how much her campaign was paying influencers to generate excitement.

It was all manufactured.  Very little organic joy.

 

[Keep Right]

5 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

Think of the carbon footprint. 

Democrats are such hypocrites. Its all about so called "climate change" to them until their selfish needs come first.

[nauseus]

7 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Not what you said.

Sore winner.

Your link.

 

While the performers donated their time and talent, the sets still required an immense commitment of manpower and financial resources.

 

Sets of plonkers. Great to see they had such a great result!

[Jingthing]

24 minutes ago, mokwit said:

Beyonce reputedly was paid $10m to speak from a lectern for a few minutes.

Lie

[Jingthing]

38 minutes ago, edwardflory said:

I have US TV. Explain to me how the DNC spent 250 MILLION ( 25% of total donations - JUST a estimate  ) and I saw few ads on TV - I watch 5 different US channels on a regular basis - 3 DNC oriented, 2 conservative.

Not in swing state. Duh.

[Jingthing]

45 minutes ago, udontomi said:

cryingdick cited his source!  These sources are the ones you should be jumping on, not this poster!

His garbage source didn't even confirm his accusation.

Classic sore winner sleaze move.

[pedro01]

9 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

I have no idea which ones showed up for free or got paid. Oprah reportedly got $1 million. The Harris campaign is in debt $20 million. She spent an entire $1 billion the most ever in campaign history, during the shortest campaign ever and got such bad results. Can you imagine her trying to make policy for the USA given this record? 

 

The stars seemingly didn't even genuinely support her.

 

https://nypost.com/2024/11/08/us-news/kamala-harris-campaigns-election-eve-concerts-said-to-cost-up-to-20m-as-rank-and-file-staff-vendors-fear-they-wont-be-paid/

 

Come on man - you don't really think she spent a billion on the campaign do you?

 

The whole thing is a massive money-laundering operation. 

 

Pockets were lined - that's all that matters. The result - not so much. 

[mokwit]

7 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Lie

Did she do it for free?

[mokwit]

27 minutes ago, impulse said:

There's also a lot of press about how much her campaign was paying influencers to generate excitement.

It was all manufactured.  Very little organic joy.

 

Joy cameth in the morning apparently - couldn't follow the accent.