Kamala Harris would not have been the candidate had Biden done what he said he would - be a one term President and make way for new blood. 
 

When he stepped down Obama spoke of a contest to select a new candidate, but that was quickly shut down when Biden backed Harris. No contest, just a fait accompli. 
 

 

24 minutes ago, LALes said:

Democratic party is completely bankrupt.  They have nobody on the bench.  I don't care what Bill Clinton says.  Good luck finding a viable candidate for 2028.  

This from a 75-year-old lifelong Democrat.  My parents were Stevenson democrats.  This 21st century mob is the worst.  I wouldn't vote for them with your dick.

That's ridiculous.

The reason we got Harris this time was because Biden made the mistake of running for the nomination and dropped out last minute.

Just because you don't know about the democratic bench doesn't mean they don't have one. 

18 minutes ago, AlexRich said:

Kamala Harris would not have been the candidate had Biden done what he said he would - be a one term President and make way for new blood. 
 

When he stepped down Obama spoke of a contest to select a new candidate, but that was quickly shut down when Biden backed Harris. No contest, just a fait accompli. 
 

 

Most likely true so sadly that is on Biden. If Harris had emerged from a normal primary process, which is very doubtful, at least she would have been a better seasoned candidate.

Posts with derogatory nicknames, intentional misspellings, or personal remarks will be removed. Spell names correctly for all sides of the debate.

15 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Autocratic regimes sometimes come into power via elections. Such Orban, Putin, and Hitler. 

So you have said, over and over…

 

Hitler loving MickyD. 

 

16 hours ago, ModdaPunk said:

How dumb can they be ?

 

• Kamala Harris is the top choice of Democrat voters to be the party’s nominee for the 2028 presidential election, with 41 per cent support in a recent poll.
   
• Other top contenders for the Democratic nomination in 2028 include Gavin Newsom, Josh Shapiro, and Pete Buttigieg, who received 8, 7, and 6 per cent support respectively.
   
• Despite her loss in the 2024 election, some in the Democratic party believe Kamala Harris would be well-positioned to run again in 2028 due to her wide base of donors and support among congressional Democrats.

Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/democrats-want-kamala-harris-run-210148541.html

The Democrats (including me) don't have a "Death Wish"; we have a "Life Wish."

Harris didn't do so badly. She did get about 48% of the popular vote in this election. Trump lost the last election but was still nominated by the Republican Party this time - and won. Why wouldn't Harris still be considered? 

I, however, would prefer someone like Pete Buttigieg, even though I know the majority of my fellow USA citizens are not ready for someone like him...yet. But after four years of Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress, they might be willing to vote for any Democrat nominated.

6 minutes ago, Chosenfew said:

So you have said, over and over…

 

Hitler loving MickyD. 

 

I never said he was literally Hitler.

Of course he isn't literally Hitler.

Even JD Vance his VP who has apparently been replaced by co-president and corrupt oligarch Elon Musk understood that when he wondered if Trump would be America's Hitler. Not literally Hitler. There was just the one.

16 hours ago, ModdaPunk said:

Despite her loss in the 2024 election, some in the Democratic party believe Kamala Harris would be well-positioned to run again in 2028 due to her wide base of donors and support among congressional Democrats.

I do hope they run her in 2028.  🙏 

33 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

The Democrats (including me) don't have a "Death Wish"; we have a "Life Wish."

Harris didn't do so badly. She did get about 48% of the popular vote in this election. Trump lost the last election but was still nominated by the Republican Party this time - and won. Why wouldn't Harris still be considered? 

I, however, would prefer someone like Pete Buttigieg, even though I know the majority of my fellow USA citizens are not ready for someone like him...yet. But after four years of Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress, they might be willing to vote for any Democrat nominated.

There is a huge difference, Trump never rolled over on his back and said he lost, he kept on telling the American people he won, and never gave in. True or noth, Americans seems to believe in certain lies and lies that continiously being repeated over and over again and again. 

 

Mix that with American Wrestling show, and you got the American hearth 

9 minutes ago, Hummin said:

There is a huge difference, Trump never rolled over on his back and said he lost, he kept on telling the American people he won, and never gave in. True or noth, Americans seems to believe in certain lies and lies that continiously being repeated over and over again and again. 

 

Mix that with American Wrestling show, and you got the American hearth 

Yes! I recently was skipping through the channels on my TV and saw Trump and Musk sitting in the front row in a UFC match! 😄

16 hours ago, Jingthing said:

More likely to find her on the dinner theater circuit.

Did you know as a teenager in Montreal she was a theater kid? 

Doesn't surprise me at all. It certainly seemed as though she remembered her lines very well indeed. She was also exceptional at changing her accent to suit the situation.

1 hour ago, WDSmart said:

Trump lost the last election but was still nominated by the Republican Party this time - and won. Why wouldn't Harris still be considered? 

 

That's actually a pretty good point

Doesn't matter who they run, if they maintain the progressive woke left agenda they will lose.

2 hours ago, ModdaPunk said:

 

That's actually a pretty good point

Possibly because he had also won once before that?  

27 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Possibly because he had also won once before that?  

 

Maybe yeah...

Harris 2028 feels like a risky choice for the dems imo.

But who knows ?

She won't be running against Trump so she might actually have a chance...

 

12 minutes ago, ModdaPunk said:

She won't be running against Trump so she might actually have a chance...

 

She'll be running against Vance, so she actually won't.

4 hours ago, WDSmart said:

The Democrats (including me) don't have a "Death Wish"; we have a "Life Wish."

Harris didn't do so badly. She did get about 48% of the popular vote in this election. Trump lost the last election but was still nominated by the Republican Party this time - and won. Why wouldn't Harris still be considered? 

I, however, would prefer someone like Pete Buttigieg, even though I know the majority of my fellow USA citizens are not ready for someone like him...yet. But after four years of Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress, they might be willing to vote for any Democrat nominated.

 

Democrats don't have a life wish when it comes to unborn babies, they want to push women to have the 'right' to kill them. It's amazing that the worst ever candidate got so many votes, maybe the 1.6 billion bought some after all?

4 hours ago, WDSmart said:

Harris didn't do so badly.

 

 

 

4 hours ago, WDSmart said:

Trump lost the last election but was still nominated by the Republican Party this time - and won.

 

Won despite all the fake news, leftist social media, gaslighting, leftist academics, DNC, corrupt political lawfare and convictions, censorship, constant barrage of lies, dire predictions, and name-calling, rewriting of history, pandering vote-buying, divisive racial and gender politics, assassination attempts, illegal attempts to keep him off the ballot, no voter IDs in blue states, and a $1 billion campaign chest buying Beyoncé, Oprah, Lizzo, and Bruce Springsteen to get people to Kamala's rallies.

 

4 hours ago, WDSmart said:

I, however, would prefer someone like Pete Buttigieg

 

Incompetent small-town mayor who couldn't fix a pothole. Do nothing and a failure, just another DEI hire. Might need to go on maternity leave again. Doesn't have a prayer and even moronic Dems put him at the bottom of their list. Newsome's in distant 2nd position after Kamala, but as DeSantis shredded him in a joint interview, Vance will easily as well. Most voters really don't want the USA to look more like California.

 

 

On 11/21/2024 at 5:33 AM, NoDisplayName said:

 

That is so true!

 

Imagine winning an election with both the electoral vote AND the popular vote!

 

Totalitarianism, that's what it is.

Evil, dystopian, fascisticism!

 

Getting more votes is obviously the work of Satan.

 

Only when Trump wins. We had 8 years of bleating about how HRC won the popular vote.

12 hours ago, ModdaPunk said:

 

That's actually a pretty good point

Harris wasn't nominated by anyone except the cabal that imposed her on the election campaign. She didn't win any primary of any sort for POTUS.

8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Harris wasn't nominated by anyone except the cabal that imposed her on the election campaign. She didn't win any primary of any sort for POTUS.

 

She won the one that counted.

 

The vote by the small group of "democracy-minded" individuals who meet in smoke-free, free-range, vegan back rooms and decide the decisions, unburdened by the burdens of the will of the peoples.

On 11/20/2024 at 10:59 PM, ModdaPunk said:

How dumb can they be ?

 

• Kamala Harris is the top choice of Democrat voters to be the party’s nominee for the 2028 presidential election, with 41 per cent support in a recent poll.
   
• Other top contenders for the Democratic nomination in 2028 include Gavin Newsom, Josh Shapiro, and Pete Buttigieg, who received 8, 7, and 6 per cent support respectively.
   
• Despite her loss in the 2024 election, some in the Democratic party believe Kamala Harris would be well-positioned to run again in 2028 due to her wide base of donors and support among congressional Democrats.

Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/democrats-want-kamala-harris-run-210148541.html

Butt hurt dedication to the woke movement!

DEI , identity Politics and cultural Marxism , is wounded!

Progressives will never understand they went to far to the left!

 

On 11/20/2024 at 9:22 PM, Hummin said:

A good explanation might be Americans mental health status, and why do Americans have such bad mental health? Richest country in the world? 

Yeah, good philosophical question that warrants a 500 page thread.

 

Whatever you do, don't lose your mind. 

 

 

On 11/20/2024 at 11:06 PM, Hummin said:

We know that, I just stated as for now, she is the only one who possibly could beat Trump. Not my intention upset you 😁

 

From what i saw of Michelle speaking at the convention she hurt Kamala's chances of winning. I am not so sure she would perform as well as Kamala if being a man hater is her platform. The conditions she may have done well under no longer exist. There is no way we go backwards down that tired path. Her speech could almost be a footnote in history of when woke died. 

 

 

36 minutes ago, Cryingdick said:

 

From what i saw of Michelle speaking at the convention she hurt Kamala's chances of winning. I am not so sure she would perform as well as Kamala if being a man hater is her platform. The conditions she may have done well under no longer exist. There is no way we go backwards down that tired path. Her speech could almost be a footnote in history of when woke died. 

 

 

Kamela tried to play Trumps game, it was doomed to fail. 

12 hours ago, NoDisplayName said:

The vote by the small group of "democracy-minded" individuals who meet in smoke-free, free-range, vegan back rooms

 

I'd be surprised if there aren't cigars and carnivorous catering in those back rooms... Hypocrisy rules the roost among that crowd.

10 hours ago, riclag said:

Progressives will never understand they went to far to the left!

 

The only take-away "progressives" ever have from failure is the conclusion that there wasn't enough leftism -- and that they therefore need to double down (on the ideas that led to failure).