Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

Gotta read the "news" carefully.  Remember, it's written by infotainment staff, not actual old-style journalists.

 

Headline says Trump is releasing records of three assassinations, leading the public to believe EVERYTHING will be released.

 

Further into the short article, we learn that ALL the remaining records of MLK and RFK will be released, but as to JFK only that THOUSANDS of pages will be released.

 

Thousands, out of possible tens of thousands.

 

National security concerns still trump Trump.  I doubt we're gonna see everything.

 

Heck, I'm still waiting for Trump to release the Kracken!

 

I've got my tree-fiddy ready.

There have been previous releases of unredacted material.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Donald John Trump becomes President. Signs dozens and dozens of EOs. The best part is the haters will continue to hate, and those that rejoice in smaller gov't lower taxes, fewer regulations, vouchers so poor children can go to proper schools, and the complete disappearance of DEI will dance. I wonder why DEI never made it to the NFL or the NBA. Stupid merit based organizations where they judge people based on their skills, leadership and attitude. Whether THAT person will add to the sports organization's attempts to become champions. I don 't think the people who PAY into that HUGE pile of money divvied up among the owners and players would like an organization that hired people based on the proper percentage represented on the team. All black defense? WHO CARES? Are they the best you can get? All white offensive line? WHO CARES? Are they the best you can get? 

Love sports. Until they began to allow men to beat the holy hell out of women, it was a merit based system. The purpose of title lX was NOT to allow men who pretend to be women to enter that sport and dominate. It was meant for women to have equal access to opportunities that excellence in sports can offer.

 

"I'm so glad! I'm so glad! I'm glad I'm glad I'm glad!

I'm so glad! I'm so glad! I'm glad I'm glad I'm glad!

"I'm so glad! I'm so glad! I'm glad I'm glad I'm glad!

I'm so glad! I'm so glad! I'm glad I'm glad I'm glad!

 

I'm so glad! I'm so glad! I'm glad I'm glad I'm glad!

I'm so glad! I'm so glad! I'm glad I'm glad I'm glad!

"I'm so glad! I'm so glad! I'm glad I'm glad I'm glad!

I'm so glad! I'm so glad! I'm glad I'm glad I'm glad!"

 

Thank you, Skip James, for such deep, reflective and observational lyrics. Some of us will never forget you!

Posted
1 hour ago, impulse said:

 

You're assuming that Oswald wasn't just a patsy.  That may be correct.  Or it may have been the Mob, the CIA or LBJ or ???.  In any case, how are Americans supposed to trust the gub'ment if they won't release the information?

 

The bigger implication is that Americans should be allowed to know the truth.  That's the only way for the gub'ment (and the MSM) to regain the people's trust.

 

Agreed. People are smart enough to handle the truth. Usually. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, bradiston said:

There have been previous releases of unredacted material.

 

But not "all".  "Some" unredacted material was released. 

 

Releasing unredacted "FOUO" documents is not the same as releasing unredacted "Secret" documents is not the same as releasing "Top Secret" documents is not the same as releasing "If-I-Tell-You-I-Gotta-Kill-You" security level documents.

 

FBI, CIA, and 17 other intel agencies all have a say.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Ridiculous comment. Try commenting on the topic rather than your usual anti-Trump emotive nonsense.

Well he did cancel all health research, so smoke screen yes. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Neither could the last President, or the last but one before that, who could only use ballpoints!

And didn't Charlie III get a proper fountain pen which did not work and he was heard to utter an expletive? 

Posted
42 minutes ago, nickmondo said:

i would say that you are just being stupid, but i wont as i might get told off.

but it appears by the comments on here that its not your first time with nonsense talk

Obviously, I am not allowed to call you stupid.

But how would you call people who believe politicians in general, and Trump specific, don't do some things to divert the attention away from what they are actually doing? Did you never hear that things like that happen? 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

I didn't say it won't be interesting to see what will be declassified - and let's see how much of it will be declassified.

But tell me, do you really think Trump does this only to inform the people? Or might he have some other reasons to do that?

And for the record: This method is used by governments and corporations all over the world. It's not something only Trump does.

 

I thought conservatives were the conspiracy thinkers. Now look at this.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
8 hours ago, frank83628 said:

 

You could have just said it will be interesting and left it at that...  but your trump derangement wouldn't allow it.

And your sycophantic attitude to Trump wouldn't allow you to leave it either.LOL 

Posted
2 hours ago, DD86 said:

I thought conservatives were the conspiracy thinkers. Now look at this.

Yep, mentalists, Brians fried by the mere mention of the orange one

  • Like 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, findlay13 said:

And your sycophantic attitude to Trump wouldn't allow you to leave it either.LOL 

I wouldn't have said anything, but the dude couldn't help himself 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Is it ridiculous?

What I wrote happens regularly. Give people something to talk about and do something you don't want that they even think about while they talk too much.

But maybe you missed this because you were gullible enough to look at the smokescreen. 

Oh, right... You're talking about Joe and Kamala.

  • Like 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Yep, mentalists, Brians fried by the mere mention of the orange one

Who is Brian..........?  :unsure:

  • Haha 1
Posted

This cover up exposes the unelected 

bureaucrats that Trump & Shummer has been  referencing for so many years!

 

I read on twitter if there isn’t total adherence to the  declassification efforts, federal marshals will respond!

 

God Speed

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, jas007 said:

I think most people can guess, at this point, that Lee Harvey Oswald was right that day when he said he didn't shoot anybody. He was  set up.  All that is marginally interesting, to me.  Probably everyone involved is now dead.  I can remember it all, but I'm now 73.  

 

What about RFK and MLK?  Those cases are even more interesting.  And Malcom X. I almost forgot. 

 

And then there's 9/11, the UFOs, the Scamdemic, the massive media censorship..... The hits just keep on coming.  

 

 

If all is true like you say !It will further tarnish the trust in the Washington 

Establishment !

intel bureaucracy  never intended to be truthful , trustworthy or transparent !

Credibility is theirs to abuse!

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, nickmondo said:

i would say that you are just being stupid, but i wont as i might get told off.

but it appears by the comments on here that its not your first time with nonsense talk

Brilliant summation!

Posted
11 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Is it ridiculous?

What I wrote happens regularly. Give people something to talk about and do something you don't want that they even think about while they talk too much.

But maybe you missed this because you were gullible enough to look at the smokescreen. 

 

   OK, will you keep us informed of when Trump does something , something that he's trying to hide by releasing those papers ?

   You tell us what the REAL reason is for making those papers public ?

Will Trump  quickly go off to a woman's changing room and "grab  em by the p***y" when no one s watching ?

   Everyone's busy looking at the JFK papers and Trumps having a sly grope in the changing rooms ?

  • Love It 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...