The FBI removed President Donald Trump’s name, along with those of other high-profile figures, from Jeffrey Epstein-related documents earlier in 2025, claims a Bloomberg report citing three people familiar with the matter.

 

According to reports, approximately 1,000 FBI agents were tasked with reviewing around 100,000 pages of Epstein-related records, and internal instructions asked staff to flag any reference to Trump.

 

According to people familiar with the process, the names of President Trump and other prominent individuals were then redacted by Freedom of Information Act officers because they were private citizens at the time.

 

FBI redacted Trump's name in Epstein files

Flight records show Trump took at least eight trips on Epstein’s private jet between 1993 and 1997, although those flights were between New York and Florida, not to Epstein’s private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands.

 

Guess the left will look elsewhere for next big breaking story.

Did Biden’s DOJ not have the files for four years? 

 

Poor lefties 

This report is a stunning blow to the Epstein conspiracy theorists.  1000's of people with access to the documents and not one media leak about the contents, only the "process."  Make of that what you may.

 

But all is not lost, there's a Bigfoot Research Society meet-up next week they can attend.  Maybe something more tangible than the "process" of how one might theoretically capture a Bigfoot will come from that.

No one hates 47 more than I.

 

Having said that, as @EVENKEEL pointed out in a previous similar thread, there have been no girls/women involved in this Epstein saga coming forth to claim they were assaulted by 47. Dontcha think they would have done so by now?

15 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

No one hates 47 more than I.

 

Having said that, as @EVENKEEL pointed out in a previous similar thread, there have been no girls/women involved in this Epstein saga coming forth to claim they were assaulted by 47. Dontcha think they would have done so by now?

 

Who would want to get clintoned ?

17 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

No one hates 47 more than I.

 

Having said that, as @EVENKEEL pointed out in a previous similar thread, there have been no girls/women involved in this Epstein saga coming forth to claim they were assaulted by 47. Dontcha think they would have done so by now?

They all went to the national inquirer with their stories. They were paid off and the stories were buried.

Do try and keep up.

1 hour ago, EVENKEEL said:

Flight records show Trump took at least eight trips on Epstein’s private jet between 1993 and 1997, although those flights were between New York and Florida, not to Epstein’s private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands.

 

Guess the left will look elsewhere for next big breaking story.

Naa folks ain’t stupid we know,we also know about him obstructing justice (docs case) being extremely casual about our national security we know he’s a fraud kinda obvious what his art of the deal is so naaa we know .we also know he’s going to get away with it.thats not making America great that’s making us more like a banana republic.

2 minutes ago, Tug said:

Naa folks ain’t stupid we know,we also know about him obstructing justice (docs case) being extremely casual about our national security we know he’s a fraud kinda obvious what his art of the deal is so naaa we know .we also know he’s going to get away with it.thats not making America great that’s making us more like a banana republic.

Time for some purple highlights and throw some sandwiches at the National Guard or Border Patrol.

 

If the dems want any chance, ever. Come up with solutions and plans. Don't just keep complaining and name calling.

3 hours ago, bannork said:

The FBI removed President Donald Trump’s name, along with those of other high-profile figures,

Bill Clinton perhaps?

12 minutes ago, Tug said:

Naa folks ain’t stupid we know,we also know about him obstructing justice (docs case) being extremely casual about our national security we know he’s a fraud kinda obvious what his art of the deal is so naaa we know .we also know he’s going to get away with it.thats not making America great that’s making us more like a banana republic.

Has 47 obstructed justice, especially in this Epstein kerfuffle? Absolutely.

Was he involved in actually assaulting young girls? I don't think so.

Does he have a penchant for young girls? Obviously.

 

Last personal observation - is he covering for his buddies? If you can't see that then you are ignorant, accidentally or intentionally.

Just now, dinsdale said:

Bill Clinton perhaps?

Oh gawd, "whataboutism?" Next thing you'll be doing is name-calling cuz those are the only two things you have in your bag of tricks, and you don't have to actually think and use facts with those two weak tea poopie-throwing tactics.

He' already a convicted sex offender who's a compulsive liar inconceivable he wasn't bang at it🤔 

1 hour ago, mogandave said:

Did Biden’s DOJ not have the files for four years? 

 

Poor lefties 

Yes -- but given that they were involved in investigations that resulted in federal criminal indictments in both Washington DC and Florida by mid-2023 involving his presidency and post-presidency, maybe they had other things on their plate other than the possible peccadilloes of Mr. Trump maybe 20+ years back.

22 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Oh gawd, "whataboutism?" Next thing you'll be doing is name-calling cuz those are the only two things you have in your bag of tricks, and you don't have to actually think and use facts with those two weak tea poopie-throwing tactics.

Clinton visited the island on several occasians. Does this make him guilty of anything?

7 minutes ago, sammieuk1 said:

He' already a convicted sex offender who's a compulsive liar inconceivable he wasn't bang at it🤔 

liar. Trump is not a convicted sex offender.

2 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

Yes -- but given that they were involved in investigations that resulted in federal criminal indictments in both Washington DC and Florida by mid-2023 involving his presidency and post-presidency, maybe they had other things on their plate other than the possible peccadilloes of Mr. Trump maybe 20 years back.

Was there anything more important to the Biden DOJ than getting Trump? I think not. 

 

And why no leaks? 

 

 

3 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Was there anything more important to the Biden DOJ than getting Trump?

Other than 2 federal criminal indictments.

 

Jeffrey Epstein: Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton named in court files
4 January 2024

 

 

The court documents include a section where Maxwell's lawyer seeks to debunk a media report that, shortly after he left office in January 2001, Mr Clinton travelled to Epstein's private island in the Caribbean.

 

A lawyer for Maxwell said that the former US president "did not, in fact travel to, nor was he present on, Little St James Island between January 1, 2001 and January 1, 2003".

The lawyer added that if the claim were true, Secret Service agents would have been required to submit travel logs of the trip.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67865190

They must have used a lot of black ink ....

 

regards worgeordie

16 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Clinton visited the island on several occasians. Does this make him guilty of anything?

It makes YOU guilty of pure whataboutism. Your next reply to me will be something rude with no facts about THIS topic.

19 minutes ago, mogandave said:

liar. Trump is not a convicted sex offender.

Looks like your delusional and the liar

 

Donald Trump's reputation took a hit after a New York civil trial jury found in favor of journalist E. Jean Carroll's claims that he battered and defamed her during the 1990s.

On Tuesday, May 12, 2023, the Manhattan jury of nine men and three women found the former president liable for sexually abusing and defaming Carroll and awarded Carroll $5 million in damages.

However, the lawsuit's conclusion appears to have led some to believe that Trump has been convicted of rape and used that understanding to attack him on social media.

4 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

It makes YOU guilty of pure whataboutism. Your next reply to me will be something rude with no facts about THIS topic.

Guilt by association. This is the same for both Clinton and Trump and quite possibly all the others that have had their names redacted. 

Of course Patel the bootlicker would order this. Trump is ass guilty as they come and has alot to hide. He was a sex freak and would have very likely been unable to say no to a gorgeous 16 year old. 

 

 

33 minutes ago, mogandave said:

liar. Trump is not a convicted sex offender.

The animal should be in jail for 20 years and thats just for his haircut.

40 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Guilt by association. This is the same for both Clinton and Trump and quite possibly all the others that have had their names redacted. 

That’s remove the redactions and release the files.

 

Let all those named account for their actions.

 

Failure to do so is protecting pedophiles, a new article of faith for Trump supporters, both foreign and domestic.

57 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Most all of them from Biden’s DOJ.

Biden doesn't have a DOJ. He isn't president. Duh.

1,000 FBI agents, working on 100,000 pages of documents. That is, by any measure, a massive undertaking, a huge cover up. It took place on "Trumps watch" (time in office, not the ones he is selling - have any of those materialised yet by the way?). Trumps name, and others were removed " because at the time they were private citizens!" Give me strength, couldn't even the clown car collection of buffoons who are running this <deleted>show come up with a better cover story than this?

 

Such cover ups on such a scale,  inevitably fail; this one will. And when it does it will absolutely rock the very foundations of the political system in the USA, and likely other countries. The amount of effort going into it, and the scale of the undertaking, together with the massive fortune which Epstein built, seemingly out of nowhere, suggests compellingly that many of the powerful and wealthy, private citizens or not, were involved. We know Trump was involved, we know Prince Andrew was involved, there are strong suggestions that Bill Clinton was involved (although his high political profile at the time, and his concomitant Secret Service cover may make that less likely - I would bet he wished he was, right up his street!) It is very likely, almost certain, others with money, influence and power were involved, and politics, business and money are so intertwined now in the US that the ramifications will be far reaching. Maybe it will break the hold of the oligarchy? Who knows.

 

 

The cover up will fail, the truth will leak out, and when it does it will be quick and dramatic. I doubt that Trump will stand trial, he is too old, the evidence will be too redacted and otherwise too interfered with to be relied on in court, and certainly the current Department of Justice would never act. Even a future Democrat led administration, unless it is extremely radical, would I suspect not have the stomach for it, perhaps the Latina hottie from the Bronx would act, but it is probable that the house of cards would have collapsed before she will be in a position to do anything - more is the pity! The shame it would bring upon the Office of President is simply unimaginable. So Trump will escape, and his fellow players in the "filthy game" will slink off into the shadows.

 

If there were to be a trial, or a massive public investigation, perhaps that new gilded ballroom that they are planning to build onto the White House would be just the venue?

2 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

No one hates 47 more than I.

 

Having said that, as @EVENKEEL pointed out in a previous similar thread, there have been no girls/women involved in this Epstein saga coming forth to claim they were assaulted by 47. Dontcha think they would have done so by now?

Umm... This is from 2016.

 

 

5 hours ago, bannork said:

The FBI removed President Donald Trump’s name, along with those of other high-profile figures, from Jeffrey Epstein-related documents earlier in 2025, claims a Bloomberg report citing three people familiar with the matter.

 

Lol, this is standard FBI practice when they release files. Check any non-Epstein related FBI files, that's exactly what you'll see, names redacted all over the place.

2 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:

Time for some purple highlights and throw some sandwiches at the National Guard or Border Patrol.

 

If the dems want any chance, ever. Come up with solutions and plans. Don't just keep complaining and name calling.

You should have listened closer there were many fine solutions ideas and bipartisan legislation……now instead of being a champion of democracy and innovation we are dismantling our democracy piece by piece and aligning ourselves with the worst of the worst.