Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We are buying a house on Koh Samui in a new development that is about half complete. The house and land are one price, 2.8m. My girlfriend wants to make sure that I have some legal rights with respect to everything. What can or do I need to do? I've seen a bit about usufruct and superficies, but really have no idea what they are all about. Sorry for the ignorance. And this is NOT a topic about trust between me and my girlfriend, I'm looking for technical information about ownership options, especially in light of the latest crackdown on dummy companies to hide ownership. Thanks.

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, ezzra said:

Word to the wise, unless you have formed a company that own the house where's your name appear as a major share holder you stand a chance to claim part ownership on the house when things will turn sour, ( like they do most of the times) otherwise, once the house is on the wife/GF name this is it, you have no rights what so ever...

This is the kind of information I'm looking for. I had thought of this, but was looking for some confirmation, maybe some details about how the process works. Thanks.

Posted
27 minutes ago, GalaxyMan said:

This is the kind of information I'm looking for. I had thought of this, but was looking for some confirmation, maybe some details about how the process works. Thanks.

Do as many foreigners are doing when it comes to buying a house/land, set up a company where by you have equal shares and said company owns the property, you'll a lawyer to help you with all the formalities, if you're in Pattaya i can recommend you such person...

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, ezzra said:

Do as many foreigners are doing when it comes to buying a house/land, set up a company where by you have equal shares and said company owns the property, you'll a lawyer to help you with all the formalities, if you're in Pattaya i can recommend you such person...

I was under the impression that there needs to be a Thai partner who has to have a majority of the shares; more than 50%, in other words.

  • Like 2
Posted

Used to be dead easy with the lawyer cobbling together a 'company' of disparate Thai people who would make up the Thai-held majority 51% while the largest single dilution would be the law-bending, loop-hole enlarging, farang 49%er. More recently, these sort of proxy foreign land ownerships have come under increasing scrutiny. I also hear that the Thai diluters also need to have evidence of paying their taxes which rules out the usual maid, lawyer's gardner and favorite noodle seller's brother-in-law being the shareholders.

 

IMHO, the usufruct is the much more acceptable way to go (for now). Since the OP isn't married, he can do this with his girlfriend as I understand one cannot set up a legal usufruct with your spouse.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, GalaxyMan said:

This is the kind of information I'm looking for. I had thought of this, but was looking for some confirmation, maybe some details about how the process works. Thanks.

you have to be company's share holder, appears you are foreigner, no more than 49% ownership in your name the rest belongs to Thai person but there are options.... should seek legal counsel and they should be able to explain all details to you, some time ago here in the forum there was mention of government hunting down such practices

Posted
1 hour ago, Langsuan Man said:

Your impression is wrong.  It is called diluting shares so you insure that NO ONE PERSON has 50%.  The normal dilution would be four shareholders with 3 having 17% and you having 49%, thus insuring that you have a majority of voting shares and are made Chairman 

 

  

what about if the 3 @ 17% are friends/colleagues/relatives/neighbors and so forth.... they still have 51% majority, it happen not long ago to one of my acquaintances....tuff luck hein???

Posted
6 minutes ago, Sheryl said:

Usufruct will ensure your access to and use of it and protect against sale to others

Can you explain what a usufruct is in a little more detail please?

Posted
2 hours ago, Langsuan Man said:

Your impression is wrong.  It is called diluting shares so you insure that NO ONE PERSON has 50%.  The normal dilution would be four shareholders with 3 having 17% and you having 49%, thus insuring that you have a majority of voting shares and are made Chairman 

 

  

Would you buy a used car under such a provision?

 

Being appointed the chairman of your own jalopy would be such fun...

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, baansgr said:

The true honest answer is as a Foreigner you have no rights to any property other than a freehold Condo in Foreign  quota. ...

Absolutely 100% correct.

 

5 minutes ago, baansgr said:

Any exotic, weird or unusual way to try and own property will involve Thais that have the upper hand always.

Usufructs do have an exotic-sounding name but properly set up, they are robust, legal protections that do not give the Thai partner 'the upper hand' in any way at all. The old-school way of forming a company isn't exotic weird or unusual considering this is Thailand but their robustness under legal scrutiny is very questionable.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Langsuan Man said:

Your impression is wrong.  It is called diluting shares so you insure that NO ONE PERSON has 50%.  The normal dilution would be four shareholders with 3 having 17% and you having 49%, thus insuring that you have a majority of voting shares and are made Chairman 

 

  

 

I don't see your post saying those three individual  shareholders must be Thai.

 

I wonder how successful the average falang is at having three Thai's as unquestingly loyal business partners?     Would in-laws show loyalty to the falang or the falang's partner?  Their  niece, daughter or ?

Posted

There are some nice condos on Samui why not consider one of them and have it in your own name. Replay is one of them by Fisherman’s village . Just a thought

  • Like 1
Posted

Find your perfect place to lease/rent, with a contract duration and clauses that suits your needs.  You will never actually own it in Thailand anyways.  Move or abandon if neccessary...  Do the baht vs ego math...

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, GalaxyMan said:

I was under the impression that there needs to be a Thai partner who has to have a majority of the shares; more than 50%, in other words.

usufruct for life or 30 years is best but probably they dont do it in samui at least on phangan they dont. i have 5 usufructs in chiang mai no problem. in phangan i did it with 2 companies each company owns 50% of the other, since a LTD is seen as person and i own 49 % of each company and a thai owns 1% of each so nobody can screw you over and its legal but expensive.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, mariohh1 said:

usufruct for life or 30 years is best but probably they dont do it in samui at least on phangan they dont. i have 5 usufructs in chiang mai no problem.

I bought a house in Pattaya a few months ago. Had to complete in a real hurry. The previous owner had a 30 year usufruct but my lawyer (tosser) told me that they had ceased the practice 12 months earlier. I suspect that he said this to push me down the company route but I refused. Wondering if I can backfit the usufruct?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Spidey said:

I bought a house in Pattaya a few months ago. Had to complete in a real hurry. The previous owner had a 30 year usufruct but my lawyer (tosser) told me that they had ceased the practice 12 months earlier. I suspect that he said this to push me down the company route but I refused. Wondering if I can backfit the usufruct?

yes you can do the usufruct after if the thai agrees

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, mariohh1 said:

yes you can do the usufruct after if the thai agrees

 

 

or a normal 30 year lease its safe as well but with usufruct you can do for life thats why i like it better and i sold houses with it easy too. i do sell and own for 10 years without being married or having a thai GF.

Posted
6 hours ago, GalaxyMan said:

I'm looking for technical information about ownership options, especially in light of the latest crackdown on dummy companies to hide ownership.

Well you have been given some good advice apart from the chicanery around company shareholdings, but this is Thai law, "forming a company whose sole purpose is to own property/land is illegal" no matter how you try to work around it.

 

A good point was made inasmuch as your Thai partner can buy/own the land whilst you can own the house, but the funds to buy that land should come from her.

 

I am not au fait with usufructs/superficies etc and folks on here who have knowledge and experience with these may be able to help, but not sure how many Thai lawyers will have the requisite knowledge either, so hunt around and please don't be pushed into the "company route" esp if the "company" has no other purpose than property/land ownership..........losing everything or the potential to do so is not a burden to be carried lightly.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, GalaxyMan said:

This is the kind of information I'm looking for. I had thought of this, but was looking for some confirmation, maybe some details about how the process works. Thanks.

 

You get a lawyer or an accountant to prepare some basic easy documents and take them to the Thai companies office (can actually be done on line) to register a Thai company.

 

NOTE: Some Thai and foreign lawyers will try to tell you it's required by Thai law to have a lawyer set it up. That's totally not true. Also lawyers will try to charge totally outrageous beyond belief fees for what's quite easy to do and doesn't need all that much time.

 

Many accountants and other business agencies do this set up, they are well capable and mostly at reasonable fees.

 

The basic scenario is:

 

- A group of Thai nationals (about 4 or 5 but that can change a bit) are recorded as together owning 51% or more of the shares in the company.

- The foreigner or a group of foreigners are recorded as owning 49% of the shares (the foreigner(s) cannot own more than 49 % of the shares).

 

Upon registration it is recorded in the company official records (this is called the articles of association of the company) that:

 

- The company only has one director

- The director is the only person who can sign any document / transact any business whatever for the company.

- It's also recorded at the same time that

- You are appointed as the director, or

- In some cases that's not possible at registration but it can be changed to you 1 year later or similar.

 

All of the above means that you don't have a controlling ownership picture but you do have control of the company finances, activities etc.

 

There are also requirements about capital at the start of the business, other TV members are more up to date on this point.

 

Once the above is all set up the land and house, or land only or house only can be recorded at the lands title office as being owned by the company.

 

The company must submit an annual company report to the Thai companies office and must also submit audited accounting records annually.

 

And yes several times in the last 10 years there has been mention of the government cracking down on these 'shell' companies, having then disbanded, stopping their initial set up etc., but it's a very floppy picture. 

 

  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...