Jump to content

UK had 'one or two' Brexit teething issues on fishing, minister says


Recommended Posts

Posted

Can someone explain why we suddenly need all this infrastructure? It says to check imported goods....presumably we have always imported goods...is the amount we import from the rest of the world really so paltry.....and we still get the vast majority of our imported goods from the EU......won't goods  all be coming from the Pacific Rim in the future?

 

If this is to check goods from the EU why do we need it?......We never checked anything previously.....do we think the EU is suddenly going to dump inferior goods and infected animals on the UK?

 

Is the EU having to build similar infrastructure just for goods they will continue to import from the UK?.....If so, is it all built and in place......why are we so behind in having these structures in place if we knew we needed them since 2016?

Screen Shot 2564-03-08 at 03.08.59.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
On 3/4/2021 at 10:45 PM, david555 said:

(Seems things are getting hot tempered .....????)  on Italy's request...

 

 

https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1405595/Italy-vaccine-news-Australia-Oxford-AstraZeneca-shipment-blocked-EU-latest-Covid

 


EU blocks shipment of 250,000 Oxford vaccines to Australia after Italy makes plea
ITALY has activated the European Union's vaccine export ban to block a shipment of life-saving jabs being sent to Australia.


By JOE BARNES, BRUSSELS CORRESPONDENT
PUBLISHED: 14:56, Thu, Mar 4, 2021 | UPDATED: 15:34, Thu, Mar 4, 2021

 

Rome triggered the mechanism to stop 250,000 doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine from being sent outside the bloc. It notified the European Commission who signed off on blockade as part of its vaccine export transparency scheme. Brussels is currently engaged in a furious battle with the Anglo-Swedish firm after it delayed a shipment of doses to EU member states.


Under the scheme, EU-based vaccine makers must secure approval from national health authorities before shipping their jabs abroad.

 

At a virtual summit of the bloc’s leaders, Italian prime minister Mario Draghi last week questioned why the bloc had not deployed its draconian powers.

 

more...

 

I wonder how long it will take before the EU accept their shame and admit their failings, instead of disrupting supplies to countries that have legitimate orders - disgusting.

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, Tofer said:

 

I wonder how long it will take before the EU accept their shame and admit their failings, instead of disrupting supplies to countries that have legitimate orders - disgusting.

Oh you sure was good at it making special line in your contract with AZ....that is why E.U. go act as bailif for goods paid but not delivered at them ....????

  • Like 2
Posted
On 3/5/2021 at 12:27 AM, candide said:

That was expected.

 

That was disgusting, and indefensible.

 

The EU's contractual legal battle with AZ is not a valid reason to prevent the export to countries who are ahead in the queue for delivery.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Tofer said:

 

That was disgusting, and indefensible.

 

The EU's contractual legal battle with AZ is not a valid reason to prevent the export to countries who are ahead in the queue for delivery.

Classify it under "taking control of our borders or what's produced under contract on it ".....

must sound familliar to brexiteers i presume ????

  • Like 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, david555 said:

Oh you sure was good at it making special line in your contract with AZ....that is why E.U. go act as bailif for goods paid but not delivered at them ....????

 

The UK input their investment in the vaccine development, before they were even approved for use. The EU have, presumably paid for their order, which doesn't entitle them to queue jump.

Posted
21 minutes ago, david555 said:

Classify it under "taking control of our borders or what's produced under contract on it ".....

must sound familliar to brexiteers i presume ????

What it means is that countries should now restrict medicine originating from outside their borders to ensure for national securities sake that there is a local pharma industry to rely on.   So in the future all EU/UK medicines that are in competition to medicines in the importing company  should be banned.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Tofer said:

 

The UK input their investment in the vaccine development, before they were even approved for use. The EU have, presumably paid for their order, which doesn't entitle them to queue jump.

They paid mony up front  for the devellopment of the vaccin ....

But that is unconviniant i guess to you as a reply to get what was in the contract ????

 

  • Like 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, david555 said:

They paid mony up front  for the devellopment of the vaccin ....

But that is unconviniant i guess to you as a reply to get what was in the contract ????

 

Disgraceful behaviour by the EU. 

 

At least Germany is standing up for what is right. The EU is really showing it's true colours yet again. Thank god we're out.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/05/australia-requests-review-italy-block-astrazeneca-vaccine-export

 

image.png.daff0148f007d063545eccd6c215c386.png

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
On 3/4/2021 at 6:27 PM, candide said:

That was expected. The EU made a prepayment of 336 million euro in August 2020, which has been invested by AZ in its production facilities, just to be told the order could not be delivered.

 

2 hours ago, Tofer said:

 

That was disgusting, and indefensible.

 

The EU's contractual legal battle with AZ is not a valid reason to prevent the export to countries who are ahead in the queue for delivery.

The answer was in the post you truncated.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

Disgraceful behaviour by the EU. 

 

At least Germany is standing up for what is right. The EU is really showing it's true colours yet again. Thank god we're out.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/05/australia-requests-review-italy-block-astrazeneca-vaccine-export

 

image.png.daff0148f007d063545eccd6c215c386.png

 

 

Spahn's comment is quite relevant. However, it would be quite negligent to not implement EU based strategic supply chains for drugs and vaccines in the medium term.

Edited by candide
  • Like 2
Posted

A post containing non standard correct font has been removed.

 

If you are going to "copy n paste" you need to format the post correctly or it will be removed.

Posted
1 hour ago, candide said:

Spahn's comment is quite relevant. However, it would be quite negligent to not implement EU based strategic supply chains for drugs and vaccines in the medium term.

 

Fortunately Brexit Britain has stepped in and agreed to help our Australian friends and partners with the vaccine. Showing the way again.

 

https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6237682836001

 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Don't worry. Brexit Britain has stepped up to the plate to help our Australian friends and partners.

 

 

https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6237682836001

 

image.png.aa04955297a89338f97a95ad2b182f12.png

So that's a good solution ????, generous from Boris to help them out .....,you could  call it a " reorganization of distribution" ,   repairing the AZ  shortcoming on their E.U. contract ????

  • Like 2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...