Jump to content

Trump under investigation for potential violations of Espionage Act


Scott

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ThailandRyan said:

Your view is one of skepticism.  Fingerprints on documents may say otherwise and as they follow up on more leads more people may fall under the view of investigators, I have only seen that not occur only once in my career, and that was when they only wanted the top person prosecuted and the others left to being bagged on other charges.

They certainly won't be fingerprints of FBI agents. Whatever you may think of them, the chances that FBI agents handled those documents with bare hands is nil. So that leaves the secretary, Kilimnick, Trump himself, any of his family, the secret service stationed at his house, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

I'm fine with criticizing authority, honestly. But not at the defense of the obvious perpetrator and without a shred if evidence. That's just deflecting and muck raking.

Wait, that's not what you said.  Which was that anyone who questions the honesty of an FBI Director has lost credibility for the shear act of questioning.  So now you say you're fine with questioning an FBI Director . . . honestly, in fact.

So which is it?  Okay?  Not okay?  Depends on which way the wind blows?  Better, depends on how it suits my political viewpoints.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

It is a pattern of growing list of people Trump hired who eventually soured on him. Barr who called him crazy for his assertion that the election was fraud and was called “he sucked” by Trump (classy). Pence who disobey him was almost hang, Bolton, Mattis, Kelly and many many more. You don’t think that the problem is Trump?

Lol

 

Remember.........

 

His Game show/Reality show "The Apprentice" was based entirely  on "hiring" a bunch of "wrong" people.......... then he "You're Fired!" them one by one, until there was one "right" person left. Lol

 

Before he was elected and shortly thereafter, people kept saying he was going to be able to get great people. I responded, "Look at The Apprentice. He usually chooses veryn very poorly, not great people!"

 

His rapid revolving-door administration proved me right. In, out. In, out.

 

Indeed, in the last two years, he basically stopped giving people the job! They were all  "temps" or "acting" So and So's! Hahahaha 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tippaporn said:

Wait, that's not what you said.  Which was that anyone who questions the honesty of an FBI Director has lost credibility for the shear act of questioning.  So now you say you're fine with questioning an FBI Director . . . honestly, in fact.

So which is it?  Okay?  Not okay?  Depends on which way the wind blows?  Better, depends on how it suits my political viewpoints.

Stop trying to put words in my mouth. Quote me or shut up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

They certainly won't be fingerprints of FBI agents. Whatever you may think of them, the chances that FBI agents handled those documents with bare hands is nil. So that leaves the secretary, Kilimnick, Trump himself, any of his family, the secret service stationed at his house, etc.

Did I say they would be FBI prints?  All search warrants are generally served and those looking for items wear gloves.  The prints I am saying they will check for would be others associated with The Donald, maybe his lawyer, his son etc..... There is no way to know where those documents may have traveled to with the Donald, who he could have shown them to, others, ie....why a potential espionage case is being investigated.  All prints will be checked with exemplars on file and known folks whose classification status would have allowed them to touch the documents will be removed as potential suspects.  Had it happen many times. 

Edited by ThailandRyan
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:
27 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

"OK, lets assume you are correct, how is any past conviction for corruption by the FBI relevant?

I am correct.  If the FBI has proved to have been corrupt in the past (it has) it doesn't say much for it going forward and its involvement with this case, does it?   

 

"The mere fact that questions have been asked exonerated Trump?"

Exonerated from what?  He hasn't been charged with anything to be exonerated from!

 

"You're just scratching around to find any reason to excuse Trump or cast doubt on his accusers".

Not at all.  I'm commenting on what some ill-informed posters are saying here.

 

"Unless you can keep the discussion limited to this incident and the documents then you are off topic and deflecting".

All my comments are related to this thread so your assertion that they are "off-topic and deflecting" [sic] is wrong.   Since when have you been authorised to tell other members how to post?  

 

The DoJ is an organization, it is not an individual.

I'm well aware of that.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:
3 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

I'm well aware of that.   

Please do not cut my statements and respond out of context.

Quoting parts of comments is permitted as long as the snipping does not alter  context.  I did not alter the context of that part of your comment.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

  

1 hour ago, ThailandRyan said:

For your edification having just the papers in his possession is only part of a case for espionage or treason?  There are other factors one must have to put the entire case together.  Do you think that I can obtain a breath test on the spot for driving while drunk and being involved in an accident and arrest and prosecute you the next day?  If you do then you have no idea of what your talking about.  Cases take time, sometimes years to build and then prosecute.  

You would be behind bars though.

I just stumbled upon your simple, succinct, yet deadly accurate reply.  :biggrin:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The DoJ is an organization, it is not an individual.

 

Individuals may or may not be capable of correcting their behavior, tge ability to correct the behavior of organizations is a demonstrable fact:

 

Fire and replace the management.

Restructure the organization.

Re-write procedures and practices.

Subject the organization to oversight.

 

The list goes on.

 

Your assertion that because the FBI abused its power in the past is somehow evidence of abuse now is patent nonsense.

 

 

 

 

In particular after the IG audit which found some flaws in the process (but also found out that, apart from one sub-case, the Russia investigation had been properly predicated). It compelled the FBI to re-assess and change their procedures.

Edited by candide
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ozimoron said:
13 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:
20 minutes ago, ozimoron said:
25 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

  

57 minutes ago, ozimoron said:
1 hour ago, Bkk Brian said:

Well you can look at the evidence they've gathered and wait for the outcome or speculate on the honesty of the FBI director?

Speculating on the honesty of an FBI director is a habit of Trump's. That alone undermines his credibility.

You're an Aussie.  So you can be forgiven for not knowing FBI history.  J. Edgar Hoover was as honest a FBI Director as they come.  Thanks for the injection of some much needed humour in this thread.

Back to being serious.  You suggest that questioning authority undermines one's credibility.  In actuality the reverse is true.  Those who slavishly follow authoritarians have lost all credibility.  And credibility may be the least of the noble virtues one contemptuously kicks to the gutter.

I'm fine with criticizing authority, honestly. But not at the defense of the obvious perpetrator and without a shred if evidence. That's just deflecting and muck raking.

Wait, that's not what you said.  Which was that anyone who questions the honesty of an FBI Director has lost credibility for the shear act of questioning.  So now you say you're fine with questioning an FBI Director . . . honestly, in fact.

So which is it?  Okay?  Not okay?  Depends on which way the wind blows?  Better, depends on how it suits my political viewpoints.

Stop trying to put words in my mouth. Quote me or shut up.

Gladly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

If Trump makes it to be president again, Goddess forbid, he can't be prosecuted during that time. 

Possibly this was why Trump was trying to "play out the clock" by refusing access to the NARA documents, as is his usual MO.
 

Constitutional issues about separation of powers conflict with the fact that "no-one is above the law". Trump already has been deemed not above the law by SCOTUS in two cases when he was sitting president. His lawyer in impeachment, Ken Starr, also the prosecutor for Bill Clinton's case, also deems "no-one is above the law" even a sitting POTUS.
 

Edited by LosLobo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tanlic said:

As a Brit on the outside looking in I find it amazing how low the standars of education are in the USA and how easily led their people are. 

Joe Biden sits in a bunker eating ice cream and wins their elction beating a President who has done more good in 4 years than any other in history.

 

Trump did get silly saying the elction was rigged which it was but not in the way he was sying it happened. The left's constant barage of lies, hoaxes by the media and fake impeachments convinced the dumbest of the dumb Trump was some kind of monster.

 

The power of the left came to the fore and  the dumbest ice cream eating clown emerged from his bunker to become POTUS. His forst task was to reverse evey bit of good Trump had done and to hell with the consequences. The result the worst economy in history, first American soldiers in 4 years are killed. Putin says Yipee and invades the Ukraine and Rocket man starts playing with his toys again. The ordinary man on the street can hardly pay his bills or fill his car with fuel and Biden's leadership has hit everone in the pocket from Kansas to katchanaburi.

 

SureTrump tells lies like all politicians to try nad sustain support but he's not a crook like Biden or that criminal son of his. Like Hillary and the deletion of 36,000 emails that had been subpoenaed they are untouchable. Trump on the other hand they can't allow him tobecome President again so they come up with yet another witch hunt. Never mind the fact he had the poer to declassify every piece of paper he had the right to remove from the whitehouse. They are looking for affect in the most underhanded move againt an ex President in history.

 

Guess what American Hard Lefties? Their banana republic behaviour is not going to work this time. Apart from Trump being hit by a bolt of ligtning the Trump De Santis avalanche is heading your way at a million miles per hour.

How did you get inside my head to write that?  Bravo, mate!  :jap:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tippaporn said:

I know of no driver who has failed to pass a sobriety test not being arrested on the spot, especially after an accident.  Courts are booked with current cases and so your appearance goes to the end of the line.  But you will be busted on the spot.  In your given scenario your suggestion that the arrest and prosecution happens after a case is first built gives me little confidence that you understand the process well enough to provide edification to anyone.

Aside from that comment you miss my point.  Which is that to say that the prevailing consensus amongst leftists here is that the law regarding possession of classified documents is unambiguous and therefore Trump has been caught dead to rights, is guilty, and should immediately advance to Leavenworth.  What case needs to be built?  So if the left's consensus is so deadly accurate then why hasn't Trump been arrested?  The question is actually rhetorical from our perspective.

Now I and others are saying "not so fast."  There's much here that needs to be processed . . . properly.  But no, no, no.  The leftists here refuse to entertain any ideas of mitigating circumstances on this cut and dried case that would rain on their victory lap parade.  Even in your postings you seem to have concluded the case is done and dusted.   It just needs to be built up further.  That's all.

After six years of trying to get Trump on anything and everything, even a jaywalking charge, it's all been a miserable failure.  But this one I believe will backfire spectacularly.  They went too far this time.  I could be wrong but we'll wait and see.

 

It doesn't matter how strong the evidence is. The Attorney General, especially this one, is going to dot the i's and cross the t's. All of them. Good lawyers are careful. Not impulsive. Come to think of it, that goes for good Presidents, too.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Tanlic said:

As a Brit on the outside looking in I find it amazing how low the standars of education are in the USA and how easily led their people are. 

Joe Biden sits in a bunker eating ice cream and wins their elction beating a President who has done more good in 4 years than any other in history.

 

Trump did get silly saying the elction was rigged which it was but not in the way he was sying it happened. The left's constant barage of lies, hoaxes by the media and fake impeachments convinced the dumbest of the dumb Trump was some kind of monster.

 

The power of the left came to the fore and  the dumbest ice cream eating clown emerged from his bunker to become POTUS. His forst task was to reverse evey bit of good Trump had done and to hell with the consequences. The result the worst economy in history, first American soldiers in 4 years are killed. Putin says Yipee and invades the Ukraine and Rocket man starts playing with his toys again. The ordinary man on the street can hardly pay his bills or fill his car with fuel and Biden's leadership has hit everone in the pocket from Kansas to katchanaburi.

 

SureTrump tells lies like all politicians to try nad sustain support but he's not a crook like Biden or that criminal son of his. Like Hillary and the deletion of 36,000 emails that had been subpoenaed they are untouchable. Trump on the other hand they can't allow him tobecome President again so they come up with yet another witch hunt. Never mind the fact he had the poer to declassify every piece of paper he had the right to remove from the whitehouse. They are looking for affect in the most underhanded move againt an ex President in history.

 

Guess what American Hard Lefties? Their banana republic behaviour is not going to work this time. Apart from Trump being hit by a bolt of ligtning the Trump De Santis avalanche is heading your way at a million miles per hour.

Let me guess - you're Margaret Thatcher's grandchild? Please spellcheck your posts, she would be embarrassed. Forget grammar, it's a lost cause.

In the next couple of months, I am predicting Trump's so-called avalanche will melt like an ice-cream cone in the Sahara. Take care not to get in the way of the truck that's about to hit him.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, candide said:

It's been reported by plenty of media.

Here's another one!

https://www.businessinsider.com/jared-kushner-private-equity-firm-funding-from-saudi-arabia-report-2022-4

 

There is an obvious conflict of interest.

 

P.S. Before you start with but, but, Hunter. Hunter was not holding an important position at the WH.

There's an interesting fact jared does not know. Whether this is relevant or not I will not say.

 

jared communicates with MbS via WhatsApp. jared is seemingly unaware that NSA/CIA/FBI can all break WhatsApp's encryption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...