1 hour ago, proton said:

No it's promote, they will be adding a P soon to LGBTQIA+ for pedophiles, already called minor attracted people, it's sick and degenerate.

 

57 minutes ago, proton said:

Woke is feelings over facts

Nonsensical overly emotional hyperbolic rubbish, and ticks the irony box to boot.

4 hours ago, georgegeorgia said:

anti LGBTQ signs and anti trans signs

trans involves surgery and altering the human body.

 

not a black or white simple issue.

 

 

26 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Yes, those are books that are not allowed in a school library , a school library didn't allow those books because they were considered to be pornographic .  

Do you have a source for this claim? It is my understanding that the books are either under review or "banned" for what is assumed to be a violation of Florida's "Don't Say Gay" law, which is what I assume you mean when you say pornographic. I haven't read the 4 books I listed earlier, though I am curious as to what parts of those books were at least initially interpreted as being gay or pornographic.

 

26 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Really need to use a full sentence here "Banning books (from a school library) , rather than just say :Banning books"

 

I don't need any such "full sentence" as my reply was not only in response to, but also included, the following quote

 

Quote

what books have they banned, apart from LGBT propaganda in kiddies libraries?

 

4 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

trans involves surgery and altering the human body.

I don't believe that's correct.

2 minutes ago, spongeworthy said:

Do you have a source for this claim? It is my understanding that the books are either under review or "banned" for what is assumed to be a violation of Florida's "Don't Say Gay" law, which is what I assume you mean when you say pornographic. I haven't read the 4 books I listed earlier, though I am curious as to what parts of those books were at least initially interpreted as being gay or pornographic.

 

 

I don't need any such "full sentence" as my reply was not only in response to, but included the following quote

 

 

Better to take it to a thread about that topic , otherwise it will all get deleted 

5 hours ago, scubascuba3 said:

But whose god is the real, one and only god?

 

There are hundreds of gods dating back thousands of years, and many are still worshipped nowadays, so what gives the Christians, (in this case) the right to say that?

4 hours ago, scubascuba3 said:

But whose god is the real, one and only god?

 

There are hundreds of gods dating back thousands of years, and many are still worshipped nowadays, so what gives the Christians, (in this case) to say that?

4 hours ago, georgegeorgia said:

GOP?

MAGA?

If you don't know what they mean, simply highlight the term and search the internet.

3 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Better to take it to a thread about that topic , otherwise it will all get deleted 

All I asked for was even a single link.

 

Why even bring it up if you're not prepared to back it up? Seems to be a trend in this thread. ????

9 minutes ago, spongeworthy said:

I don't believe that's correct.

do you have a link from a reputable source to back up that claim?

 

7 minutes ago, billd766 said:

But whose god is the real, one and only god?

God Almighty is the main god.

God Short-pants is his underling.

 

3 hours ago, Moonlover said:

That certainly wouldn't work in our village. Every time someone dies a collection is made, small but sufficient to ensure that the deceased receives  their funeral rites. No one misses out on their final journey to the cremation oven. And eventually I expect to be making the same journey.

It is the same in our small village in rural Kamphaeng Phet. Even I as a farang am covered though it costs an extra 100 thb a time for me.

4 minutes ago, spongeworthy said:

All I asked for was even a single link.

 

Why even bring it up if you're not prepared to back it up? Seems to be a trend in this thread. ????

Somebody else bought it up and I replied to that and then you replied to me and if you read the thread title , banning books in the USA isn't the thread topic .

   There  is a thread about banning school books from USA schools already running, take it there where it will be on topic

5 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

do you have a link from a reputable source to back up that claim?

 

https://www.cdc.gov/lgbthealth/transgender.htm

 

https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/adult-health/in-depth/transgender-facts/art-20266812

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender

 

 

2 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Somebody else bought it up and I replied to that and then you replied to me

That somebody was me, you replied to me, and I replied to you.

The thread quickly turned Political !  Protest pics ,Trans , alphabet people ,religion ,political parties .

Oh my 

 

4 minutes ago, billd766 said:

It is the same in our small village in rural Kamphaeng Phet. Even I as a farang am covered though it costs an extra 100 thb a time for me.

I told my wife to stick me in the freezer so she can collect my UK pension. ????????

Just now, riclag said:

The thread quickly turned Political !  Protest pics Trans , alphabet people ,religion ,political parties .

Oh my 

 

The thread is about intolerance in Thailand and apparently Cambodia, by foreigners, of certain groups of locals which the natives appear to be tolerant of. That is the discussion. The fact that many of the intolerant people have shown up in this thread is only fitting. ????

3 minutes ago, spongeworthy said:

That somebody was me, you replied to me, and I replied to you.

It was Premiumlane who bought the off topic subject up 

Many people who are labelled as "anti-trans" are simply saying don't trans under 18s and no penises in women's bathrooms or changing rooms.  Both seem perfectly sensible and are for the protection of women and children.

4 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

It was Premiumlane who bought the off topic subject up 

How is it off topic? It's the same people who want to ban books for being "gay" or "pornographic" (with racism being the obvious true motive in some cases) who are the very same intolerant people this thread is about.

1 minute ago, spongeworthy said:

How is it off topic? It's the same people who want to ban books for being "gay" or "pornographic" (with racism being the obvious true motive in some cases) who are the very same intolerant people this thread is about.

This thread is about go gooders who come to Thailand and this thread isn't about banning books from USA school libraries 

3 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

Many people who are labelled as "anti-trans" are simply saying don't trans under 18s and no penises in women's bathrooms or changing rooms.  Both seem perfectly sensible and are for the protection of women and children.

That is an interesting subject.

 

If somebody is pre-op (still has a penis) perhaps it is appropriate to use the "Men's Room" (Male's Room?).

 

If somebody is post-op, what is the fear? That a rapist or pedophile had their penis surgically removed in order to gain access to female restrooms with the intention of committing sexual assaults?

 

I guess the same questions are applicable for the women-to-male side of the equation.

2 hours ago, 2baht said:

And how many do gooders do you think it will take to over run 68 million Thai's??? ????

2700 years at the present rate of 25,000 a year 

6 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

This thread is about go gooders who come to Thailand and this thread isn't about banning books from USA school libraries 

And as I said, those do gooders are the ones who want books banned. It's completely natural to come up in such a discussion. Do you not think it possible that part of their do-gooding could eventually lead to the threat of banning books here? That's optimistic.

30 minutes ago, spongeworthy said:

All I asked for was even a single link.

 

Why even bring it up if you're not prepared to back it up? Seems to be a trend in this thread. ????

Trolling- makes a claim and when asked to back it up says it would be off topic.  A student of right wing trolling methods can find a fertile playing field (55) in several characters on AN.

25 minutes ago, spongeworthy said:

https://www.cdc.gov/lgbthealth/transgender.htm

 

https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/adult-health/in-depth/transgender-facts/art-20266812

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender

The Mayo Clinic.

Yes, of course.

The doctors performing these surgical procedures are making a fortune.

So, it's very gracious of them to write a neat little blog with all the sub-categories neatly defined.

 

2 minutes ago, Slip said:

Trolling- makes a claim and when asked to back it up says it would be off topic.  A student of right wing trolling methods can find a fertile playing field (55) in several characters on AN.

I have asked him to take it to an on topic thread (of which there is a thread running ) , that way it wont be deleted for being off topic .

  Staying on topic really isn't "trolling" 

1 minute ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

I have asked him to take it to an on topic thread (of which there is a thread running ) , that way it wont be deleted for being off topic .

  Staying on topic really isn't "trolling" 

Then you should not have made the claim.  This is also off topic so please don't feel a need to reply.

Just now, Mac Mickmanus said:

I have asked him to take it to an on topic thread (of which there is a thread running ) , that way it wont be deleted for being off topic .

  Staying on topic really isn't "trolling" 

Yes, multiple pages deep already and posting 1 link would be off topic, but discussing why you won't provide said link ad nauseam is apparently on topic.

 

I hope you do understand that nobody is buying this, though the mental gymnastics you're going through are proving to be quite entertaining.