Jump to content

Court rules Move Forward attempted to topple constitutional monarchy


Recommended Posts

Posted

Screenshot-2024-01-31-152009.png

 

The Constitutional Court today unanimously ruled that the  Move Forward Party and its former leader Pita Limjaroenrat have attempted to overthrow the constitutional monarchy by campaigning to amend the lese majeste law or Article 112 and ordered them to cease all activities related to it.

 

While the court did not decide whether the reformist party should be disbanded, the ruling is likely to pave the way for subsequent legal efforts to have the party dissolved.

 

The case stemmed from a petition by lawyer Theerayut Suwankesorn in July last year, accusing the party and its then-leader Pita of seeking to overthrow Thailand’s constitutional monarchy.

 

Full story: Thai PBS 2024-01-31

 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

 

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

 

Join us now!

  • Sad 22
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

That's the way it is. That's the way it'll stay. Forever. MFP did not have the talent maneuver politically. They put themselves in a trap. Election Commission will follow up and ban the party and Pita. 

  • Sad 5
  • Love It 1
Posted

Very sad day for Thailand, and their so called democracy... Laws should have the possibility to be amended.. Updates are needed to keep on in recent times.. Law for death penalty is also out of date and new laws as samesex marriage are being brought in... I am sure Thailand will pay a price for this verdict No TAT can prevent that 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Another dad day for Thailand.  They just trickle out the bad things in small bites like a python in its final act. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

The "permanently offended " community  seem to have taken a  dislike to some valid words in the english language.   Note how they typically  issue instructions  as to what words they personally  think should be used.   The use of a word like "disgusting" is nothing more than a predictable tactic  to  take the moral high ground,and indulge in a bit of virtue signalling,  Whilst at the same time vilifying another poster for making a perfectly appropriate comment.  A relatively  new division  of the  grammar police  

 

I think there's an age aspect to that too: People under about 50 or maybe 60 and not much education use the word 'peasant' as a term of abuse ...

  • Confused 3
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...