Trump's Authoritarian Revolution -- Be Ready, It's Coming Soon

[dinsdale]

Just now, Jingthing said:

What are you talking about?!? I've already conceded the house the maga.

DUH! 

Boy you do have some problems with comprehension. The house is still in balance. It's not gone either way as of yet. It's on a knives edge. DUH!

[Hawaiian]

2 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Boy you do have some problems with comprehension. The house is still in balance. It's not gone either way as of yet. It's on a knives edge. DUH!

The more you point out the inaccuracies in his posts, the deeper the hole he digs.

[Tony M]

Its about time this thread was locked. It serves no useful purpose.  The OP does nothing more than we have seen in the US election hate postings (by both sides).  Lock the post, and ban the author. He is, currently, a dreadful troll..

[James105]

29 minutes ago, phetphet said:

Has there always been this much animosity in American politics when there was a change in Presidents?

 

We are living in a social media age.  Bit of a game changer in political discourse really when you can have an argument with someone you have never met, never will meet and who cannot punch you in the nose no matter how vitriolic and disgusting your opinions are, and it can be done anonymously.  So people are emboldened.  

[dinsdale]

10 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

We are living in a social media age.  Bit of a game changer in political discourse really when you can have an argument with someone you have never met, never will meet and who cannot punch you in the nose no matter how vitriolic and disgusting your opinions are, and it can be done anonymously.  So people are emboldened.  

I would willingly discus my position with anyone in person.

[theshu25]

3 hours ago, dinsdale said:

 

The 1st woman Chief of Staff appointed by that "misogynist" Trump.

Looks a lovely bloke.

[Hawaiian]

7 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

We are living in a social media age.  Bit of a game changer in political discourse really when you can have an argument with someone you have never met, never will meet and who cannot punch you in the nose no matter how vitriolic and disgusting your opinions are, and it can be done anonymously.  So people are emboldened.  

This is why social media is a double-edged sword.  While it can make for pleasant social contact it can also be used for by bad players with nefarious motives.  This forum is a perfect example, except that moderators try to keep things from going too far.

[seajae]

This just shows how far dems will go to push their BS especially when things do not go their way, out comes the scare campaign because they cannot accept they lost, truly pathetic but typical of dem supporters

[LosLobo]

22 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Confucius say;

 

“Man who prefer chicos instead of chicas look  very stupid when he call other man misogynist “

 

I think Confucius wise man.

 

Do you think Confucius wise man?

Confucius also said, 'The superior man is modest in his speech but exceeds in his actions.' Seems like you missed both lessons—using slurs to dodge the topic and thinking clichés count as wisdom.

[G_Money]

5 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Confucius also said, 'The superior man is modest in his speech but exceeds in his actions.' Seems like you missed both lessons—using slurs to dodge the topic and thinking clichés count as wisdom.

Confucius only states facts.  Slurs not in vocabulary of Confucius.

[LosLobo]

5 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Confucius only states facts.  Slurs not in vocabulary of Confucius.

Confucius may have stated facts, but he also taught the value of wisdom, integrity, and restraint—values that seem to be missing when you rely on slurs to avoid meaningful discussion. His teachings emphasized respect for others, not resorting to dismissive jabs to deflect from an argument.

[dinsdale]

Trump will bring an end to the Ukraine/Russia war. Crimea is gone and as it is Russia is gaining more and more territory. It's a war of attrition and the drip feeding of weapons by the Biden admin and NATO isn't working and Ukraine simply doesn't have the population of fighting age people to replace losses. Zelenskyy is going to have to concede ground lost.

[BangkokReady]

1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

Give it time, they will eventually get it.

 

You're like Del Boy in Only Fools and Horses...

 

"This time next year Rodney... we'll be living in a fascist dictatorship!"

 

Then you'll say the same thing next year, and the next, and the next.

 

I wonder what your plan is for when Trump peacefully leaves office?  Presumably you'll say something like "We scared him off by constantly saying he would do it!".

 

1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

Nine days before Election Day, Donald Trump delivered his closing argument at a Madison Square Garden rally that drew comparisons to a 1939 pro-Nazi rally in the same arena and characterized by similar anti-democratic themes: demonization of immigrants and political enemies, invocation of strongman leadership, threats of violent retribution, denunciations of the press.

 

You keep quoting opinions like they were facts.  This does not help your credibility.

 

Trying to say it was like a Nazi rally was stupid, and you sound stupid repeating it.

 

The problem you have is that you're either so hopped up on lies, or you think so little of people, that you expect other people to believe the nonsense you are spouting.

 

People aren't as stupid as you think.

Edited November 10 by BangkokReady

[sqwakvfr]

Youtube vidoes.  Can be true or can be false. It depends on the viewer.  

[Hawaiian]

6 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

You're like Del Boy in Only Fools and Horses...

 

"This time next Rodney... we'll be living in a fascist dictatorship!"

 

Then you'll say the same thing next year, and the next, and the next.

 

I wonder what your plan is for when Trump peacefully leaves office?  Presumably you'll say something like "We scared him off by constantly saying he would do it!".

 

 

You keep quoting opinions like they were facts.  This does not help your credibility.

 

Trying to say it was like a Nazi rally was stupid, and you sound stupid repeating it.

 

The problem you have is that you're either so hopped up on lies, or you think so little of people, that you expect other people to believe the nonsense you are spouting.

 

People aren't as stupid as you think.

Intelligent people respect the opinions of others even if they disagree with them.  The OP seems to lack this characteristic.  Repeating some something over and over does not make it true.

Edited November 10 by Hawaiian

[Hawaiian]

3 minutes ago, sqwakvfr said:

Youtube vidoes.  Can be true or can be false. It depends on the viewer.  

Don't think so.  Believing what you want to believe does not make it true.

[G_Money]

14 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Confucius may have stated facts, but he also taught the value of wisdom, integrity, and restraint—values that seem to be missing when you rely on slurs to avoid meaningful discussion. His teachings emphasized respect for others, not resorting to dismissive jabs to deflect from an argument.

 

“wisdom, integrity, and restraint”

Confucius say;

 

”You must have serious chat with Op.  He worst violator of Confucius values”

 

[frank83628]

6 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Being passive and waiting is exactly what the maga authoritarian revolutionaries want you to do.

As in the Vexler video there are structures for hope 

But as this video indicates now that he is in power early resistance is vital.

Yes the midterms may still be ok real elections but I wouldn't bet on 28.

Trump isn't in power to help the people. 

 

 

 

 

Time is of the essense.

 

6 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Something is very fishy Indeed with the Trump Putin relationship now adding Musk.

 

 

hahahahahaha, RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA, more hysterical screechy paranoia, you have been well n truly programmed. 

[LosLobo]

27 minutes ago, G_Money said:

“wisdom, integrity, and restraint”

Confucius say;

”You must have serious chat with Op.  He worst violator of Confucius values”

Instead of hiding behind rhetoric, why not address the OP's points with facts? Personal values don’t win arguments—evidence does.

[Yagoda]

2 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Projection. With maga cruelty is the point.

Cruelty? Cruelty is chopping up a fully formed baby in the womb. Look, heres my abortion, holding up a little arm.

 

Cruelty is mastectomies on 14 year olds.

 

Cruelty is hypersexualized so called Drag Queens shaking their fake tiddies in the faces of 5 year olds while singing pronoun songs.

[BangkokReady]

1 minute ago, LosLobo said:

Instead of hiding behind rhetoric, why not address the OP's points with facts? Personal values don’t win arguments—evidence does.

 

Do you really have to address opinions with facts?  That seems like an unfair expectation.

[G_Money]

10 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Instead of hiding behind rhetoric, why not address the OP's points with facts? Personal values don’t win arguments—evidence does.

 Confucius say: “ Read Confucius last post again”

[dinsdale]

1 minute ago, LosLobo said:

Instead of hiding behind rhetoric, why not address the OP's points with facts? Personal values don’t win arguments—evidence does.

Hiding behind rhetoric is exactly what JT does and not just any old rhetoric but the rhetoric you'll find on the View and in the legacy media. You want facts here's some. Trump is President elect. Trump won the popular vote. Republican's control the Senate and possibly the House. The blue wall is now red. Whites, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Arabs, Muslims, women, middle class and the working class voted Trump in. These are not opinions or "personal values." These are now historical fact.

[sqwakvfr]

55 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

Don't think so.  Believing what you want to believe does not make it true.

Tell that to the many who actually get news from YT videos.  How many YT vidoes said "this will be  a tight race and we won't know the results for days".  

[chercheur888]

What did Donald J. confirm before being elected?

This will be the LAST election! Welcome to the Republic of Gilead.

Following is a list of his confirmed successors, starting with Jr. up to Kai:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/09/donald-trump-family-barron-ivanka-kai-melania

 

 

[Gottfrid]

15 hours ago, Jingthing said:

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him THINK.

Did you just post that a horse can´t think? That just cements the fact you are only posting garbage. Waiting for the next doom and gloom thread from you. I don´t get people like you. If a vote goes against you, then you will try for weeks or months to tell everyone it will all break down as you didn´t get it like you want it.

It´s not a question about if the country or the world will break down just because of the election went wrong way. Yes, I am also of that opinion. However, we must accept the result, if it´s a fair result without manipulation and disappearance of votes. Everything is going to survive. The voters that won, would have said the same if they lost.

Just take it as it is. There will come a new election, and them people will show if they voted right or wrong this time.

[dinsdale]

24 minutes ago, chercheur888 said:

What did Donald J. confirm before being elected?

This will be the LAST election! Welcome to the Republic of Gilead.

Following is a list of his confirmed successors, starting with Jr. up to Kai:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/09/donald-trump-family-barron-ivanka-kai-melania

 

 

It has to be HIS last election. Only 2 terms allowed.

[proton]

31 minutes ago, chercheur888 said:

What did Donald J. confirm before being elected?

This will be the LAST election! Welcome to the Republic of Gilead.

Following is a list of his confirmed successors, starting with Jr. up to Kai:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/09/donald-trump-family-barron-ivanka-kai-melania

 

 

 

Another lie, it was said by JD Vance it would be that last real election if the Democrats won

Edited November 10 by proton

[sqwakvfr]

Well I guess by 2027 when the Dems are back in control of Congress then Impeachment 3.0 or 4.0 can happen.  Also, what the heck invoke the 25th Ammendment.  But then many on the left don't want a President Vance as well. So what do do unitl 2028?  

[proton]

1 minute ago, sqwakvfr said:

Well I guess by 2027 when the Dems are back in control of Congress then Impeachment 3.0 or 4.0 can happen.  Also, what the heck invoke the 25th Ammendment.  But then many on the left don't want a President Vance as well. So what do do unitl 2028?  

 

Keep crying?