Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
39 minutes ago, Kaoboi Bebobp said:

 

 

Alas, the writing is on the wall. 

 

 

Not being sarcastic????

The medical Insurance for O-A  visa.s etc  has been on the wall .since the police order was introduced and to take effect  1/11/2019

very simple

Posted
14 minutes ago, MeePeeMai said:

Hopefully the Non-O (based on over 50 / retirement) will not be next on the list for mandatory Thai insurance (or be scrapped all together).

IMO they are next on the list - as soon as they figure out how to peel out the 50+ Expats who are on Non-O Visasa and Extensions.  But they could also just apply it to all ages of Non-O 12 month period Visas and Extensions.  Who knows for sure.  And that is the issue right there.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Kaoboi Bebobp said:

Or maybe the simplest explanation: I can imagine, without straining myself too much, that there's "something in it" for Thai immigration off the top of the insurance industry's income stream. 

And I can imagine, without straining myself too much, that there's "something in it" for Thai immigration off the bottom of the agent industry's income stream as well. 

There's only one winner out of this!

TIT

  • Like 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, DrJack54 said:

Can you direct me to one rejection for extension. It's been almost a month.

I do hope you have an O/A visa so you can have a first hand experience.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, MeePeeMai said:

There never will be a "rejection" because you are never allowed to get to the point where you are under consideration (by way of submitting your paperwork without an insurance policy). 

 

As soon as you walk in and take a number (for an O-A extension) you are immediately asked if you have a Thai insurance policy (before they even look at your paperwork).  If you reply in the negative then you will be informed that you need to have an approved Thai policy in order to "apply" for your extension at which point you will leave and decide what to do next.  You are not rejected, you are simply informed of their new policy at that time.

 

This is not a "rejection", this is simply being informed that in order for you to apply for an extension for a Non O-A you must have the required insurance.  9 times out of 10 retirees (like myself) will simply visit their local office (prior to applying) to ask for a list of the latest requirements.  This has already been reported by numerous retirees on an O-A entry.

 

 

Exactly! And after the applicant is informed, he/she decides what to do, go buy insurance (job done, no need to bleat about anything), switch to an O visa (get busy doing it) or, go home (busy packing). Note, at no point in any of the options is there a step entitled, "post experience on TVF".

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, MeePeeMai said:

There never will be a "rejection" because you are never allowed to get to the point where you are under consideration (by way of submitting your paperwork without an insurance policy). 

 

As soon as you walk in and take a number (for an O-A extension) you are immediately asked if you have a Thai insurance policy (before they even look at your paperwork).  If you reply in the negative then you will be informed that you need to have an approved Thai policy in order to "apply" for your extension at which point you will leave and decide what to do next.  You are not rejected, you are simply informed of their new policy at that time.

 

This is not a "rejection", this is simply being informed that in order for you to apply for an extension for a Non O-A you must have the required insurance.  9 times out of 10 retirees (like myself) will simply visit their local office (prior to applying) to ask for a list of the latest requirements.  This has already been reported by numerous retirees on an O-A entry.

 

 

So what your saying is that people have attended imm for their extension and told nick off you don't have insurance, as distinct from people inquiring what will happen when they next apply for extension.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mango Bob said:

I do hope you have an O/A visa so you can have a first hand experience.

I've been here 7 yrs and even if I had entered on an O-A visa it would have expired many years ago.

As for your nasty inference to me having had an O-A sadly for you I do not. Obtained non o from Vientiane many years back. In actual fact my posts have been in an effort to assist folk who did enter on an O-A. Factual reports would give them heads up to consider perhaps starting afresh with a non O.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, DrJack54 said:

So what your saying is that people have attended imm for their extension and told nick off you don't have insurance, as distinct from people inquiring what will happen when they next apply for extension.

I don't really understand your question but I am saying that whether you walk in to apply for your extension (paperwork in hand), or simply walk in asking for the list of items needed to apply for an extension you will be informed at that time of the new requirement (an approved Thai insurance policy).

 

It really makes no difference whether you have the paperwork in your hand or are simply asking for a list of items needed for your next extension, the outcome is the same.  No Thai health insurance = no extension for a Non O-A.

Posted (edited)

It would be nice to hear from someone first-hand who went for their extension in Nov 2019 who previously came in on an O-A and was told that they could not renew without insurance. It is an inconvenience, but it is not the end of the world to have to leave Thailand and get a new Non-O from an outside consulate, or a Tourist visa from an outside consulate or just come back in visa exempt and then apply for a 90-day Non-O in-country to start over. I would like to see some reports from people who were turned away and actually did one of the things I mentioned to get a Non-O.

Edited by BertM
  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, MeePeeMai said:

Switching to a Non-O seems like the best option for those that already have good health insurance, are self insured or do not wish to buy a Thai policy but I am worried that this will turn out to be a temporary solution or loophole (which might soon be addressed or closed).

You may be right in the end. Let's hope not for everyone's sake...

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BertM said:

It would be nice to hear from someone first-hand who went for their extension in Nov 2019 who previously came in on an O-A and was told that they could not renew without insurance.

 

Does this help?

 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Maestro said:

 

Does this help?

 

Yes. That's close enough. He went in Nov to ask if he would need insurance for his extension in Dec. Looks like everyone with a past O-A should plan to buy insurance or plan to get a Non-O.

And for those who don't follow TVF, they will be in for quite a surprise when they go in to get their extension and are told the bad news.

Edited by BertM
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, deej said:

Not being sarcastic????

The medical Insurance for O-A  visa.s etc  has been on the wall .since the police order was introduced and to take effect  1/11/2019

very simple

 

That's all very well, but think of all the "crackdowns" announced 197 days a year. Until it happens, I don't believe it. The reports have been coming in only in the last few hours to confirm the police order on health insurance is indeed being enforced. That's what many people have been waiting for, which is the proof. 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
8 hours ago, DrJack54 said:

I've been here 7 yrs and even if I had entered on an O-A visa it would have expired many years ago.

As for your nasty inference to me having had an O-A sadly for you I do not. Obtained non o from Vientiane many years back. In actual fact my posts have been in an effort to assist folk who did enter on an O-A. Factual reports would give them heads up to consider perhaps starting afresh with a non O.

Not assisting much ignoring what's happening.

 

What would be interesting is if anyone on an OA is using the agent method for extensions, I'm pretty sure they will be able to ignore the insurance requirements, it's just whether they want to

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

Not assisting much ignoring what's happening.

 

What would be interesting is if anyone on an OA is using the agent method for extensions, I'm pretty sure they will be able to ignore the insurance requirements, it's just whether they want to

Assist Thai Visa is probably the largest visa agent in Chiang Mai and they are instructing all their customers that health insurance is required for an O-A extension, in fact, they were confirming the need for the insurance weeks ago.

Posted
3 minutes ago, saengd said:

Assist Thai Visa is probably the largest visa agent in Chiang Mai and they are instructing all their customers that health insurance is required for an O-A extension, in fact, they were confirming the need for the insurance weeks ago.

yeah i know and so do most others now unless in denial. There seems to be two main agent jobs, one hold your hand to compile all the correct docs and two they provide the bank letter \ financial proof, that's the one I'm talking about.

 

Is financial proof on OA extensions the same as O?

Posted
11 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

yeah i know and so do most others now unless in denial. There seems to be two main agent jobs, one hold your hand to compile all the correct docs and two they provide the bank letter \ financial proof, that's the one I'm talking about.

 

Is financial proof on OA extensions the same as O?

Yes, I'm on an O-A extension and moving shortly to an O, they both require 800k for money in the bank, 400k for marriage.

 

BTW there's a third agent role, for me at least....they cut down the amount of time I need to spend extending my visa, it's 5 minutes in Immi. every year to get my photo taken and that's it. There's no more making additional copies of things, going home to get additional paperwork, no more wrong form used, do it again, no more trying to help IO's reconcile the bank letter to the bank book, no more sitting on benches waiting, and so on and so on.

Posted
42 minutes ago, saengd said:

Assist Thai Visa is probably the largest visa agent in Chiang Mai and they are instructing all their customers that health insurance is required for an O-A extension, in fact, they were confirming the need for the insurance weeks ago.

Is the agent saying insurance is required "if you dont use their services" , If they are offering a way around the insurance and 800k etc, then its in there best interest to say that.

  • Like 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Peterw42 said:

Is the agent saying insurance is required "if you dont use their services" , If they are offering a way around the insurance and 800k etc, then its in there best interest to say that.

No, the agent is saying the insurance is required however you go about extending the visa.

Posted
14 hours ago, Thaidream said:

Thailand needs to take notice and I hope the US Embassy reminds the Thai officials that applying policy changes ro rhose who entered a country under a different set of rules is not only wrong, unfair and illegal but smacks of discrimination.

You have yet to notice that this does not worry Thai government or it's people?

Anyhow, ANY rules relating to immigration are by default going to be discriminatory.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
15 hours ago, saengd said:

The previous poster wants to know why your friend wasn't on here posting what happened to him straight away, can you explain why?

Perhaps he doesn't belong to this forum eh.....Duuuh...????

 

I was contacted on FB.....????

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...